I love how they have 6 kids but still manage to lounge around in bed half naked together in the afternoon... I cant even go to the bathroom for 6 seconds in peace
I love how they have 6 kids but still manage to lounge around in bed half naked together in the afternoon... I cant even go to the bathroom for 6 seconds in peace
[/QUOTE
And she didn’t get out of bed till after 9 when Wibble was brought into her. Joyce not at work again?
I thought that and if I did get a break from my kids for any reason it would be filled with catching up on my job, house work or making food, not laying there like a pair of loved up teenagers with no responsibility!I love how they have 6 kids but still manage to lounge around in bed half naked together in the afternoon... I cant even go to the bathroom for 6 seconds in peace
Hang on a minute, let’s be sensible here. This is two individual people that became a couple and custody cases with three separate other parents. Those three parents are completely unrelated and ex partners of these two. The common denominator on all three custody cases are Rach and Josh.We don't even know for sure what happened with E's dad. We know he didn't see her for a while but nobody knows the full story, just like we don't know the full story with any of the kids really. The only thing that is known is that a court awarded J full care of his boys. Everything else is speculation.
Let’s look at the evidence here E has gone to where the parental boundaries are. S is with his mates. I is MIA(left to his own devices somewhere) T Is able to look after herself whilst knowing full well what they’re up To B is illegally working. Which Leaves Wibble who is having a kip. Mystery solved!I love how they have 6 kids but still manage to lounge around in bed half naked together in the afternoon... I cant even go to the bathroom for 6 seconds in peace
you don’t have to sterilise breast pump or bottles if you are breastfeedingDuh! Which is kind of a given. (mattress and veggie bake comes to mind again)
She did advertised a breast pump which requires sterilising and bottles washing up however. On that note she was probably fuming not being gifted an Elvie Pump like many other insta-mums.
I’d agree except Josh’s case sounds far more complex and if what’s been said here today is true and he potentially had no idea where his sons were at one point, court was the only option. There’s also previously been reference to social services being involved with the case, again with court being the only option.Hang on a minute, let’s be sensible here. This is two individual people that became a couple and custody cases with three separate other parents. Those three parents are completely unrelated and ex partners of these two. The common denominator on all three custody cases are Rach and Josh.
Now I’ve managed to get through life raising my kids who have different Dads and stepmothers without bothering any court anywhere. Contact, shared care the whole lot. There’s an antagonist at the heart of this family somewhere otherwise the courts wouldn’t have been needed on three separate cases
that’s absolutely embarrassing! how can she not see that she’s setting her kids up for bullying and pisstaking in later life??This is the post I was talking about.
Me too! She’s lovely.I know the person who sends her those sweets
Thats the thing no one is stating R is an angel and as you say there is all this evidence against her and still the boys remain in J’s care. That alone says there’s a lot more to this and very good reasons he was awarded residency.Let's not forget that R herself has had social services involved 3 times.. one being before she was insta famous (so cant be blamed on "trolls") she was a recreational drug user, has potentially accused people of sex without consent/ has someone who is a convicted drug mule around her children/ has allegedly stabbed her ex partner (was written on an early insta post on her grid) shes not exactly an angel..I know everyone has a past but shes hasnt left hers in the past...she has made her life available for everyone to bring it all up.
Their whole life is one big can of worms that never should have been publically opened and that's all on her!
Three separate cases? As far as I'm aware there were two - E and the boys. Who's the third?Hang on a minute, let’s be sensible here. This is two individual people that became a couple and custody cases with three separate other parents. Those three parents are completely unrelated and ex partners of these two. The common denominator on all three custody cases are Rach and Josh.
Now I’ve managed to get through life raising my kids who have different Dads and stepmothers without bothering any court anywhere. Contact, shared care the whole lot. There’s an antagonist at the heart of this family somewhere otherwise the courts wouldn’t have been needed on three separate cases
Especially when anyone who arrives saying they know ‘facts’ and they show R&J in a poor light are instantly believed yet if someone sticks up for them or corrects wrong assumptions they face demands to disclose their identity or are dismissed as being Rach or one of her followers. Massive double standards which lose credibility and detract from the actual issues which can be proven.Three separate cases? As far as I'm aware there were two - E and the boys. Who's the third?
All I'm saying is that there is so much we don't know, and accusing R or J of parental alienation based purely on social media posts or contributions here from people who heard one side of a story through the local rumour mill is, in my opinion, absurd and defamatory.
I haven't got my facts from the local rumour mill. The facts I have re Josh and his Mum's behaviour are true. But that is all I know, nothing else.Three separate cases? As far as I'm aware there were two - E and the boys. Who's the third?
All I'm saying is that there is so much we don't know, and accusing R or J of parental alienation based purely on social media posts or contributions here from people who heard one side of a story through the local rumour mill is, in my opinion, absurd and defamatory.