We’re getting close to the one year anniversary of the unnamed officer misconduct hearing. Could it be possible that the privacy clause could be reviewed after 12 months? I may be totally spitballing here but perhaps holding Wilby back for a year and Joyce therefore needing to be home plays into the mental health picture ?
![Direct hit :dart: 🎯](https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/gh/joypixels/emoji-assets@5.0/png/64/1f3af.png)
20th May. Forever laughing at the wise old journo who cunningly included the Chair of the Panel - Derek Marshall
![Grinning face with sweat :sweat_smile: 😅](https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/gh/joypixels/emoji-assets@5.0/png/64/1f605.png)
![Grinning face with sweat :sweat_smile: 😅](https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/gh/joypixels/emoji-assets@5.0/png/64/1f605.png)
![Grinning face with sweat :sweat_smile: 😅](https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/gh/joypixels/emoji-assets@5.0/png/64/1f605.png)
Newspapers often leave little clues in headlines or in the article itself when injunctions have been served on media reporting.
Attachments
-
81.6 KB