Part Time Working Mummy #8

[Pursey007]

She’s breached some kind of consent thing there surely. If you’re asleep you cannot consent to having videos of yourself put online, more so if you’re inebriated.

If that is this evening then yes it's not ok to do that. Doesn't look like consent took place there if it is real time I would probably drink and fall asleep if I was maried to her knee deep in life used to be hilarious. I just felt guinely awkward at her McDonald's and csr key post. The look in her eyes and the stuttering was strange and not normal. The nurse mum post tonight was heart breaking

 

[Bingewatcher92]

Hi everyone! New thread good vibes!



I don't think she's as bright as you are giving her credit for.

She may be good with the emotive speeches. She's also good with her tech. She's sharing apparent messages from a random teacher to make her feel like Parent of the Year, and mentions from a charity she's gifted some free stuff to.

She's not good at responding to her donators. Every single message and profile she has...that will be available to authorities.

I do believe those court papers randomly sent were indeed sent by her and to a genuine random too. The cover letter/explanation was not written by her. Perhaps she was drunk/emotional/not thinking straight. Who knows?

Does anyone have the screen shots on here?

 

[Skyeball]

It’s the same for the job role I do. I have to look for and block any ‘clients’ even though my FB is set to private. I also have to remove any posts that could be interpreted as offensive. Some of my friends post jokes etc that come up on my newsfeed and I go sick if they’re abit iffy and quickly delete. It’s all about being professional not only at work but in your private life too.
Edited to clarify ‘iffy’ and ‘offensive’ .. I mean jokes that are abit cheeky or political musings and opinions. Nothing horrible!!

Same here. No mention of the service i work for, Block people I have authority over, No drunk pics or references to drugs, political opinions or personal problems. Locked down profile or not.
I've had a member of my staff disciplined for being tagged in a racist meme so it is taken seriously.
The SM policy makes me want to delete the whole thing to eliminate the vulnerability, but my uni and college mates are all over the world, it's a nice way to keep in touch..so it's locked down pics of me, hubs, kids and pets, occasionally and nothing else!

 

[Pursey007]

Same here. No mention of the service i work for, Block people I have authority over, No drunk pics or references to drugs, political opinions or personal problems. Locked down profile or not.
I've had a member of my staff disciplined for being tagged in a racist meme so it is taken seriously.
The SM policy makes me want to delete the whole thing to eliminate the vulnerability, but my uni and college mates are all over the world, it's a nice way to keep in touch..so it's locked down pics of me, hubs, kids and pets, occasionally and nothing else!

Mr partner and I are law and health care. Governed by registered bodies for 39 years between us to the currebt day. What she is doing is not good. I do feel she is destroying her family so they have no option but to come back to her and rely on her. I am coming off this page as I feel this is becoming dangerous, almost like she is lighting the match throwing it and letting the fire burn while watching best thing we can do is, let her light her match make the fire and no one watch, then she needs to deal with the fall out x also one of her supporters the nurse mum is in dire straits this evening. She has not said one word about that!! I don't have a special needs child but that girl is struggling!

 

[Empen]

So I question something and this is the sort of response I get...remind you of someone?

Frankly you are being argumentative.
So many people have explained every scenario to you in many ways.
I’m stumped.

 

[Skyeball]

Mr partner and I are law and health care. Governed by registered bodies for 39 years between us to the currebt day. What she is doing is not good. I do feel she is destroying her family so they have no option but to come back to her and rely on her. I am coming off this page as I feel this is becoming dangerous, almost like she is lighting the match throwing it and letting the fire burn while watching best thing we can do is, let her light her match make the fire and no one watch, then she needs to deal with the fall out x also one of her supporters the nurse mum is in dire straits this evening. She has not said one word about that!! I don't have a special needs child but that girl is struggling!

I respect that decision and I can understand it, thank you to both you and your partner for your years of service to the public x

 

[Starshining]

No they investigate everything. If you think of it like a company and you’re not happy with the service, you submit a complaint to their complaints team. PSD, professional standards is the police equivalent. Sorta like the real life version of AC-12. With less serious bent cops. And they hang you out to dry if you’ve done something wrong

And no-one the surname starting with a “H”
(sorry!)

 

[fireflies]

Sorry if daft questions but wondered about. josh.
Was a patrol policeman in regular force initially or detective?
I like watching crime drama but many are American.
I know from some real life ones can't remember name that they can check computer for names address car registration/insurance and see if criminal record ect.
However i assume tracking down IP address (this lie that influencers spread explained here) is more specialist and he woukd require someone else on the force to help him or a specific department.
Whats do we think josh has possibly done to abuse his powers?
It does seem odd given his job role is ever changing and revealing social media profile even if he had left the force
Just curious what we suspect hes down how hes allegedly helped his wife and her crew.

 

[Baxfraie]

What is the 'Isabelle' reference about in Issac's report?

It’s all to do with a system that they have at the school, stuff to do with independence, resilience, kindness etc

 

[Plasticeyes]

Just caught up on this new thread.

Is it just me overthinking or has all the new information brought a very dark worrying element to PTWM life.

Predatory is what I am getting from this information.
Inviting a unknown female to her family home, 400 miles away from the womans hometown/family/friends?

If it was a man offering up his address and mobile and inviting a stranger to stay with him and his kids, everyone would be up in arms...

Think about it.

Safeguarding is a massive, MASSIVE issue here.

 

[Tiling4]

...apart from the friend that got married recently, all her friends seem to be the waifs and strays that she’s taken in over the years. I remember watching her arrive home from her own wedding in GG (on Facebook) and someone turned up (with her daughter) from Australia on the doorstep...another one she’d rescued from a few years back. She has a twisted/toxic hold on all of them for sure so thank goodness that the poor lady who posted earlier that declined RH’s offer to go and stay had a very lucky escape. I’d rather have no friends at all than be friends with her.

 

[Lulabella-Mozzarella]

What is the 'Isabelle' reference about in Issac's report?

I think it’s like ‘Isabelle independence’, ‘Roger respect’, ‘Charlie confidence’ - just a way teachers give things name so the kids remember them - probs just what that school uses.

 

[Tiling4]

would anyone be able to give advice on the safe guarding that she does wrong with her children? Sorry if I sound thick it’s just sometimes it’s mentioned and I don’t get what she’s done wrong.
Ie boys black eye mainly?

I wouldn’t worry, knowing very well how the school system works, EVERY member of staff is vigilant with families like this. NOTHING goes unnoticed, every concern is logged believe me.

 

[HavinAPop]

Although it’s concerning , inviting people into your home and giving your address out over the internet etc won’t be classed as a safeguarding issue. Nor would sleeping in the summer house .

The concerns have to reach a thresh hold of risk with SS and when you think about it there are many times that people invite people into their homes without knowing the person ( friends they have just met, one night stands , a new partner etc ) of course it’s basic safety and should be done with caution - but it’s not illegal , or classed as a safeguarding issue because if it was , the SS would be inundated with referrals.

I agree it’s extremely concerning but it simply won’t be classed as a Issue that reaches a level that requires intervention. If anything were right happen following this , and SS became involved it would be look at then sadly

 

[Anne28]

Could we comment on here to spread the word?

 

[Empen]

Could we comment on here to spread the word?

This morning and her seem to have some pact at the moment.
And anything that comes off here and in to many places about her is classed as trolling.

 

[Andsoitbegins]

Sadly the threshold for child protection is unlikely to be met here.

Although it’s concerning , inviting people into your home and giving your address out over the internet etc won’t be classed as a safeguarding issue. Nor would sleeping in the summer house .

The concerns have to reach a thresh hold of risk with SS and when you think about it there are many times that people invite people into their homes without knowing the person ( friends they have just met, one night stands , a new partner etc ) of course it’s basic safety and should be done with caution - but it’s not illegal , or classed as a safeguarding issue because if it was , the SS would be inundated with referrals.

I agree it’s extremely concerning but it simply won’t be classed as a Issue that reaches a level that requires intervention. If anything were right happen following this , and SS became involved it would be look at then sadly

Exactly if she invited someone to stay and then it turned out to be a perpetrator of DV for example that would be terrible. She is clearly putting her family at risk by the over sharing etc but not to meet at risk thresholds at the moment.

 

[Plasticeyes]

I agree with @Empen I would give thismorning a miss.

 

[Elgato]

Every time I come back to this thread the whole situation gets that little bit darker and intense.

Whilst I agree inviting random people into your home is not responsible it’s not a safeguarding issue as such but bearing in mind the news story concerning the paedophile lodger who murdered a 13 year old girl you absolutely have to be on your guard these days.

I was absolutely heartbroken to read the pp about being pressured into reporting something and being threatened with the loss of custody of their child by Rachel that made me gasp out loud. Then to be dropped like a hot potato when they did. This is why Rachel needs to be stopped she’s wrecking people’s lives in the pursuit of glory. Why didn’t she signpost? It just beggars belief it really does.

The PayPal stuff seems small fry (I know it’s not) compared to all this very dark stuff that’s been revealed. I wish she was bloody ashamed of herself but she doesn’t care who’s life she wrecks in the pursuit of being insta famous.

I don’t take much notice of this morning it’s all fluff.

 

[Whatwillbewillbe]

What is the 'Isabelle' reference about in Issac's report?

It’s the school ‘heros’ Isabelle independence, Toby teamwork, crystal creativity and there’s another one I can’t remember