I actually believe her story about Huxley’s behaviour; if you look on adoption forums, such behaviour is not uncommon in adoptees, including for pre-school aged children. These toddlers are capable of terrorising and controlling adults. The behaviour is caused by extreme psychological trauma in infancy, and is difficult to treat. They have just compounded it by causing the very same trauma (severing the bond of a primary career) that caused his initial trauma in the first place.
However that doesn’t justify anything, especially since they were deliberately seeking out a disabled child for clout. Her posts enquiring about disabilities that are perceived as bad, but aren’t actually that bad, says it all.
Also, her first priority in her public statement is to apologise for all the outrage and heartache she has caused her precious followers, rather than her traumatised adopted son who they’ve just re-traumatised. No, Myka, they are heartbroken for Huxley. Apologise entirely to him.
They should never have adopted him in the first place, that was their biggest mistake and the cause of this latest trauma. Huxley is probably better off without them, and without other tiny children with competing needs.
I do believe she had a childlike and shallow desire to “help” and thought that adopting would be easy. She has obviously seen parents and carers describing special needs children as beautiful, unique, etc, and taken these words at face value, without understanding the depth and truth of their experiences.