If you live in a grammar school area and DON'T get your child some extra tuition help then you're really hamstringing them, because every other child is getting help. Both our DCs had some 11+ tutoring. Even though they were both on the 'top table' at their primary and both ended up getting Level 6s in their Year 6 SATs. So according to Mumsnet they should have just merrily skipped into the 11+ exam, without a clue what verbal and non-verbal reasoning even meant, and simply breezed the test.
Yeah, just no.
The 11+ papers are like nothing they will have ever seen before. The questions are phrased weirdly. They use and require a vocabulary that is far beyond that of most 10 year olds. The maths content won't have even been covered in school yet. And to top it all off, your child has only 15 SECONDS to complete each questions. So yes, damn right I got our DCs some 11+ tuition because whilst I knew they were both clever, I also knew they weren't going to be the cleverest kids sitting the exam. And, there was every chance that even the cleverest kids were getting tuition help too. An average child who has had extensive 11+ tutoring is always going to outperform a clever child who has never seen an 11+ paper before.
The arrant shite peddled on Mumsnet about 'Oh if they're clever they just don't need tutoring' [tinkly laugh] is fucking dangerous. A lot of parents who are unfamiliar with the 11+ often buy into this bullshit, and their children miss out on grammar school places as a result. Whereas, Mrs Tinkly Laugh has been quietly tutoring little Hugo since Year 4.
Sorry, rant over. Just something I feel very strongly about.