honestly cba with this chat anymore. Please stop trying to not understand it. It’s basic sampling. I work in finance and we sample a lot - there’s so many methods because of issues with what she did. A giveaway needs to allow those who enter to have an equal chance of winning. That’s like doing a lottery for number 1-50 then saying, actually we will only call out numbers 5-30 because I cba to do the hard work of running something properly.What was illegal about it? Perhaps she could’ve selected the winner in a different way but even to be on the 20 person shortlist you still had to have your name entered. It’s not like she shortlisted 20 randomers, they all came from those who entered.
I also think to suggest they shouldve gone through all 2 million entrants individually is not realistic.
It’s wrong. There’s no argument.