I don't think this at all. Greedy is cryptic when it suits her, but I took it as H giving her the injection. Probably a fertility injection ready for the turkey basting.
We had to fight this rule when we had fertility investigations and then needed treatment, thankfully we didn't get to IVF. They had it recorded that an ex-girlfriend of my husband had a pregnancy that had resulted in a live birth, she'd had a termination! It was very stressful!
Best selling author rememberI’ve never seen the word “because” used so many times in one paragraph before.
also that poor baby forced to lie near her 1 week old leaking postpartum vag
That's awful. What an odd rule - just makes no sense. So you could marry someone in your late 20s who had a lot of partners in the past, perhaps got someone pregnant accidentally who decided to keep the kid, either of you have no contact with said kid and potentially that kid doesn't even know who their father is and you're then not entitled to IVF? That's absolutely mad.
SameUsed to love bathing mine in front of the fire in the lounge when they were newborns, didn’t have central heating so it was the warmest place to do it. Happy times
You’d have to be on a birth certificate or know about the biological child I’d assume. Anyone who has walked away from their own child (regardless of a one night stand/failed relationship etc) shouldn’t get IVF to have another if they’re already an absent parent, it’s really a shame they’re ‘allowed’ to pro create again in the first place. If they’re in a child’s life however then I think that’s a really harsh rule
I suppose I'm thinking of situations like my cousin, he had a brief relationship with someone about 17 years ago and then about two months after they split because he wasn't happy/she was a bit psycho and controlled a lot of what he did, she called him and told him she was pregnant. He wanted to be fully involved in the relationship with his child but she wouldn't let him until the child was 6 or so (for no reason from what I've heard other than she liked the control aspect of it - but admittedly that is only coming from family so two sides to every story). Since the child became a teen they wanted him to be more involved and now they see each other a few times a month. There's a lot of gray in between loving family and estranged.
It’s the excessive saliva for me, slurping away - knocks me sick
Naked again in the latest FB post
Convinced she's read something about skin to skin (why they're constantly naked) but I would be a bit worried about doing that as babies can suffocate really easily in slings if you're not on the ball and risk of over heating her (I have used slings, still using one now, always super nervous when they're small).
I'd definitely say that her older son has autism, hinch definitely isn't autistic she's just jumped on that because of her son. My 11 old is autistic and i seen some of the traits in ronnie my son has/had when he was alot younger like ronnie.
I think she’s definitely reading here and doing it on purpose! Making her baby freezing by trying to prove a point, selfish!
