MmmB777
VIP Member
Ahahahah you bunch of sad little baby murderer defending pricks. Fucking weirdos.They’ve got spies![]()
![]()
![]()
Us tattle eejits better watch what we say![]()
Ahahahah you bunch of sad little baby murderer defending pricks. Fucking weirdos.They’ve got spies![]()
![]()
![]()
Us tattle eejits better watch what we say![]()
Hahahahah shit I forgot, she actually mentioned the tattle wiki on the call!Are they going to review all the evidence and look for holes? As they won't have access to actual evidence, what are they going to do google or come here for Tofino's wiki. Or are they hoping if they get enough supporters the court will bend to the public's will. Unfortunately for Letby this maybe her only hope of freedom, not that there's much hope.
Oh yes definitely.hahahaha this is kind of what I was expecting.
They were meant to have the ‘evidence’ a few months ago that Ben Myers didn’t want anything to do with which made him a bad barrister and this case the biggest miscarriage of justice in entire British history. What happened to that? If they have the evidence to exonerate her then no social media campaign and ‘getting the message out there’ is bloody needed.
They are nothing more than just a sick bunch of Lucy fans.
Even the most organised serial killers become chaotic when they are under pressure. Letby would have known that many of the doctors suspected her. Killing was a stress relief for her. It always is for serial killers. They talk about the tension between murders building to a crescendo and killing is the only release they can find. The trophies are kept to be pored over between thrills, to get a feeling of that power back. To recall the victim and their suffering. I don't think she wanted to get caught at all. I think her psyche was crumbling and she became reckless. She couldn't bear to let those trophies go. Especially not once she'd been delegated to an office job because she had no prospect of being able to kill again any time soon. So her trophies were all she had to get that feeling again.I think when she knew they were on to her, she wanted to get caught. It might explain why she left so many incriminating notes and didn't destroy the paperwork she had kept as trophies in her home.
oh this is very good. particularly like the tattle name checkI've been following this guy's youtube (journalist?) for a while now. He attended the full trial so has a very solid first hand experience of the case, plus has done a lot of research. His latest video breaks down what the green note actually says and condemns the sleuths for misinterpreting it.
But the most interesting thing he says is that these notes, and in particular, the green note, were of very little importance to the case. Maybe 5mins in total of questioning out of 50 hours, so the prosecution case was not remotely based on the notes. Also, the green note in particular was barely mentioned in court. The yellow(?) note, where LL writes as if the triplets are all dead, although one is alive, was a more crucial part of the enquiry.
He also praised Tattlers and the wikiSo HI THERE - I'm a fan of your videos!
Here is the link for anyone that wants to watch it.
I recommend all of his other videos too for a fully unbiased view of the case from beginning to end.
Flamin eck! It's Ernie and Bert!She’s a one hundred percent deluded simpleton clearly but as they say for every pan there is a lid.
Wow. I don’t even know what to say! I can’t understand this mindset at all, that there may be a killer but it’s not Lucy??
Yes it’s contempt of court. She shouldn’t have been feeding that back to people. There was an embargo, o‘Lee and noseymoo couldn’t talk to us during the deliberations/once partial verdicts had been heard.Found the original chat here. The original poster Refraction deleted the post, but it's quoted. Shame it wasn't a screenshot, and checking the FB groups it seems Jammy is a dirty deleter. But Janet was clearly feeding him info she shouldn't have been running her mouth about. Is that contempt of court?
View attachment 2409610View attachment 2409612View attachment 2409613
some are but I also think most are wonderful. I have had 99 percent positive experiences and only encountered that one negative one, so I wouldn’t want tar them on with the same brush. For example, I had a particularly long and traumatic labour, I went through 9 midwife’s during my first labour (yes it was that long), my last ones had so much empathy that they were crying with me at the end, I’m talking full on sobs like it was them going through my labour. I’ll remember them foreverSome nurses are complete
bitches calling them angels is a joke.
Good point.I’ve finished the latest podcasts with the parents. Something I picked up on and had not considered before, and I’m not sure if we know the answer, is those two sets of parents were not familiar with NICU. The family on the most recent one said it was when they saw their second child in the neonatal unit that they realised much of what they saw with the first child wasn’t normal. I know some of the parents on the indictment had older children but I wonder if Lucy knew whether the parents were first timers to NICU.
As the old adage goes, you can’t polish a turd. Like others have said, I think BM did the best he could with what he had - I am happy her defence cost so much tbh, shows she had a fair a trial as she could have with the best possible representation, another up yours for the conspiracy theorists who said it was sub-par.I can't read the link but I assume that was paid by the government since everyone has the right to be defended.
Frankly I would ask for my tax money back that went into her defence. A blind snail would have done a better job frankly. I am all for her being guilty but I believe her case could've been defended a little better.