Starting up now on to baby H a premature baby girl
- Status
New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
We are on to child H now, apparently her care wasn't good enough from the moment she was born to the point it complicates the case... come on...
yes I would really like to know what the hospital did if they thought the baby responded very unusually to treatment. Failings at the hopsital may mean it wasn’t investigated properly or at all but it doesn’t mean she, or someone else, didn’t do it. what it might mean is that some of the later deaths/attempts could have been prevented if the hospital had done their job properly.
I wonder if the cases where the baby survived were just ignored because they survived.
They do. 100% and I swear on my childrens lives the NHS is not what it seems. I’ve posted earlier I spent 2 weeks on a convid ward last year with bleeping anemia
. My own fault, I made a crappy comment about Midazolam so off to the ward I went 
. What I witnessed has left me with ptsd. The flashbacks, the nightmares…. So either way would this case would not shock meRemember if the prosecution are doing their job correctly we should all be considering a guilty verdict, then her defense should bring us all back to middle ground. Make us critically think and ponder the actual evidence. Its ok to jump from one to another that's allowed and I think that's good as we are using our brains!
God poor baby H had a horrible start to life even before anything LL is alleged to have done
Always one, don't worry. I mentioned a 'cult' yesterday...need I say more
My little boy has CP and his paeditricion flat out refused to show me his MRI, even questioned why I would want to see it. Took me 4 months to get a general summary of the results. No images, no actual report. Had to go private for one as I cant trust them with it now.They do. 100% and I swear on my childrens lives the NHS is not what it seems. I’ve posted earlier I spent 2 weeks on a convid ward last year with bleeping anemia
I’m guessing here and using examples because I don’t know the exact numbers so this is just my thought process, but say if they can prove the baby had synthetic insulin, and can prove there are only 3 ways to administer synthetic insulin. But two of those ways can be ruled out because of X reason. That can leave only one way the insulin was administered (via a bag). So even if they don’t have the actual bag, which I don’t think they do, there can be another way to prove it by ruling out other methods.
I know this is a bit of a given and been said so many times but HOW ON EARTH did so many babies die and suffer before it got suspicious?!?? I mentioned I worked on a geriatric ward for a while and even when somebody who was really old and ill died, the death was still reviewed to make sure all correct procedures were followed and there was no suspicion. The families were often really strict making reports to the cqc and wanting these deaths properly investigated, and I’m talking deaths of patients who were sometimes like 100 years old, had heart failure, had had strokes, struggled to swallow etc… my point is, I can only imagine how distraught new parents would be in this situation and how much they’d want to know exactly why their child died… I just don’t understand how it all went on for so long
The hospitals failings do absolutely nothing to persuade me of her innocence. What I have experience of is that ABSOLUTELY somebody wanting to cause harm to others will seek out those most vulnerable. The fact the trust, hospital and unit were chaotic or badly organised and the fact there probably is no other victim more vulnerable than premature already sick babies left alone would completely appeal to somebody that had desires to harm. People like that will centre themselves somewhere they can operate more easily. That to me is much less outlandish than it being a huge conspiracy or cover up because absolutely nobody is coming out of this looking better.
Can you post a summary please I can never find the online reports
From the inspection report I read, I’m sure it said that not all deaths were reported the correct way so they didn’t get flagged. I think because of the vulnerability of the babies some of the deaths were kind of expected, which again impacted the reporting.
ETA screenshot of reporting
Attachments
Last edited:
If you use www.leaderlive.co.uk they have the updates every few mins
Attachments
Talking of “conspiracy’s”……
thewizardofozandtheolympics.blogspot.com
Beyond the Veil
The Trial of Lucy Letby “THE POISONER” Remember this….a courtroom is a Masonic temple, a trial is a ceremony where the sacrificial victim/...
thewizardofozandtheolympics.blogspot.com
I think it’s good if the prosecution make clear hospital failings too, even if there is a chance it weakens some of the evidence. It shows that the coverup/scapegoat theory is less likely. If they try and paint the hospital as doing nothing wrong and pin it all on Lucy then that would just raise more suspicion and make their evidence less credible.
Jesus Christ some people have too much time on their handsTalking of “conspiracy’s”……
Beyond the Veil
The Trial of Lucy Letby “THE POISONER” Remember this….a courtroom is a Masonic temple, a trial is a ceremony where the sacrificial victim/...
That’s the whole point.. Babies only died when she was on shift. If you look at their previous number of deaths some years there was only 1.
- Status