not that it massively bothers me, but there is a difference between clothing that is sold in plus-sizes, and actual inclusively-sized clothes - in that inclusive sizing is clothing that fits any body of any size. it may be more of a minority, but there are people who are larger than a size 24 and smaller than a size 8 - and the majority of "inclusive sized" clothing brands sell clothes up to a size 36 or 40 etc. generally not an issue, because i doubt people are desperately disappointed that they can't buy. such hideous dresses, it just seems pretty shady to actively be advertising your brand as an inclusive sized brand, when that simply isn't the case. the brand sells clothes in plus sizes. big deal. it may have dresses in sizes larger than stocked by the average high street store, but the definition of "inclusive sizing" doesn't apply, and it irritates me when brands latch onto terms which don't apply to them and use dishonestly them as a marketing tactic and as hashtags to gain attention.