Not his ex is it she has lots of tattoosComplete with tattoos
It could be but it mentions a certain word. Even if they were in a house where it happened they're playing a strange game with the wording!Havent there been pictures in the past of her in bed with Harvey where she has looked like she had no top on? Perhaps it is referring to that and it's just saying that she isn't safe and therefore return her kids to KH? Doesn't necessarily mean the allegatations are about the 2 youngest.
That would explain the delete thenTwo different journalists (one for The Times & The Guardian)’s replies to F4J’s tweet.
This latest version is still up.That would explain the delete then
Also due to the replies on that tweet it might be a good idea to edit the actual tweet out and just leave the repliesTwo different journalists (one for The Times & The Guardian)’s replies to F4J’s tweet.
Oh they posted again? Out of the loop sorry been up poniesThis latest version is still up.
Maybe they think police and SS have cocked up so badly they can't make it worse?I'll be amazed if the post lasts more than an hour again today. If there is a police investigation going on then this could surely undermine it? I can't believe they've put it up again
Yes she certainly does! And has been liking his recent posts againNot his ex is it she has lots of tattoos
No further allegations and there hopefully won’t be.If it was more false allegations about KH, then maybe the whole idea is to report it first rather than her doing it, that way she doesn't control his life for another 4 months and utterly destroy him. I doubt KH wants any of this though.
So it must be about her thenNo further allegations and there hopefully won’t be.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?