Katie Price #348 hairy back and sweaty arse crack now bailiffs entering her shitty shack

Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
Yes she certainly does! And has been liking his recent posts again
Well if she goes back there she should insist he has a full medical as God knows what he could have caught off her, though I doubt he has been near the rancid one much recently.
Would also be an idea to push him through a disinfectant sheep dip too 🤔😁
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Reactions: 37
That F4J post is also on Facebook. I agree with whoever said it'll be gone within the next few hours.
 
  • Like
  • Sad
Reactions: 10
I don't know, only other explanation is F4j have gone absolutely nuts. I would imagine it's not just Matt OC making all the decisions? The posting then retracting yesterday seems calculated.....running it past legal? Waiting for other stories to be set up?
Surely their own lawyers would not allow this to go out unless they were certain of the legal footing? Are they not supposed to have specialist legal eagles on their Team? I cannot see that they'd be stupid enough to put this out again unless they were on a sure footing
 
  • Like
Reactions: 37
Is it just me thinking that Carl could be dripping bits of info to F4J/KH?
 
  • Like
  • Haha
  • Heart
Reactions: 48
Surely their own lawyers would not allow this to go out unless they were certain of the legal footing? Are they not supposed to have specialist legal eagles on their Team? I cannot see that they'd be stupid enough to put this out again unless they were on a sure footing
I agree Rita, I think something is imminent, someone's going to be investigated, it's just too serious.
If she or someone else got arrested then they have more of a leg to stand on.
 
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 27
Surely their own lawyers would not allow this to go out unless they were certain of the legal footing? Are they not supposed to have specialist legal eagles on their Team? I cannot see that they'd be stupid enough to put this out again unless they were on a sure footing
I can't work it out as if it's true, then it's a criminal offence to name alleged victims of SA. But if its false then its defamation and they can be sued. Surely legally they are on thin ice in both instances and I just can't see their legal team allowing this to go out? Unless they hope that it will be seen by loads of people prior to a potential delete again and just using it to stir things up.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 28
So kids have been at rosie since Wednesday why?
Do you think SS have put them with her while an investigation is ongoing?
 
  • Like
  • Wow
Reactions: 32
I can't work it out as if it's true, then it's a criminal offence to name alleged victims of SA. But if its false then its defamation and they can be sued. Surely legally they are on thin ice in both instances and I just can't see their legal team allowing this to go out? Unless they hope that it will be seen by loads of people prior to a potential delete again and just using it to stir things up.
I think they're trying to force attention on it to get an arrest. (If SS reported something and police have taken no action) If she's arrested for something truly shocking I doubt there will be much more focus on what they said in the tweet.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 29
Someone on twitter has said they believe it's about Harvey. No idea if that's true but Harvey was in that flat when Carl allegedly punched a door and the flat was wrecked. Then he's off.....
Not that I’m on board with the whole thing they have said children of Katie Price they haven’t actually named j and b not that that makes the situation any better though, I’m actually beyond words now 😔
 
  • Like
  • Sad
Reactions: 32
I can't work it out as if it's true, then it's a criminal offence to name alleged victims of SA. But if its false then its defamation and they can be sued. Surely legally they are on thin ice in both instances and I just can't see their legal team allowing this to go out? Unless they hope that it will be seen by loads of people prior to a potential delete again and just using it to stir things up.
Maybe after reporting her for slander after she accused them of killing Blade and her drug use and now this they are trying to force them to act swiftly. Not that I agree with them doing it this way but if they are so concerned about the children's immediate safety maybe that's why?
 
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 30
It is truly dark and sickening, but what those poor children may have seen or been exposed to because of her total failure of being a mother I dread to think. Poor Keiran too, he must be frantic with worry. Surely this has got to be the end of her custody of them? Maybe that why she's hiding with RB.
Wonder if the papers will report this and hope that Guardian so called reporter is hanging their head in shame at that puff piece they did
Yes well-done on the Grauniad and their excellent timing of this shite "interview". Bet they're wishing they'd binned it immediately now :)
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: 39
As a survivor of childhood sexual abuse, I’m horrified that they’ve tweeted this. Victims are entitled to anonymity unless they themselves choose to waive. Whether it’s true or not, and irrespective of who the alleged victim is/are, this shouldn’t be tweeted. God, I’d be absolutely mortified if it was plastered all over social media about me, even just speculation. F4J do not have the best interests of any of those kids at heart. Ugh. Taking a step back from this thread. It’s gotten even darker than I thought possible. I just hope the kids are returned to their dad soon.
 
  • Heart
  • Like
  • Sad
Reactions: 53
I can't work it out as if it's true, then it's a criminal offence to name alleged victims of SA. But if its false then its defamation and they can be sued. Surely legally they are on thin ice in both instances and I just can't see their legal team allowing this to go out? Unless they hope that it will be seen by loads of people prior to a potential delete again and just using it to stir things up.
Just shows how fucked up this is if they're willing to risk it either way. I know f4j have their own bigger agenda, but it does feel like they're trying to get a reaction from authorities to get those kids removed ASAP.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 35
So kids have been at rosie since Wednesday why?
Do you think SS have put them with her while an investigation is ongoing?
No idea - KFP is going off to panto today isn't she? So someone has to be looking after them as she did say that she would not be taking them. No indication of Jett being there though.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 14
Just a bit of levity from my browsing and musing. Regarding her love for love island, no pun intended, She often comes out and says she fancies one or more of the men. These are usually in their 20,s who go on their to find love with similar aged attractive women. How can she put herself in that bracket and realistically would they like to go out with someone as old as their mum? I know you do get the sad sack like this week who says they fancy her, but I,m sure that is the glamour model,of the past they are fantasising. Even to raise your profile in my opinion these days there is little kudos for them.
 
  • Like
  • Sick
Reactions: 24
They must be sure though surely they wouldn’t post for the hell of it, and while it does not name the kids involved and it’s not clear if the allegation was made by skank or towards skank the only person. They have made clear it’s not is KH, it is also leaving others open for speculation.equally if there was a chance it was true by them posting then the accused will claim unfair trial ie trial by media.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 22
Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.