Katie Price #271 Tits n lips is all that can be seen coz now shes just an old has been
- Start date
-
- Tags
- Katie Price Threads Wiki
- Status
New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
Still begging for work.. you're done, Kipper. Nobody should want to work with you ever again.
I think it’s gone from mirror,I didn’t see anything.
Notice how the heavy duty scaffolding aka bra is inches wider than her ribcagecan you get anymore photoshopped and filtered to fuckery and back.. you know you are a bloated old toad now Kipper, every single pic has to be industrially filtered to death so you appear sexy, with a womanly figure. #pastit #nolongerhasit #deludedbitch #animalabuser #neglectfulwitch #no1conartist
View attachment 2130801
Blimey that filter has carved a right old tonnage off the thing
---
hahahaha! NO! duck off you animal (and child) abusing hole!
And how fast would she turn her cell into a squalid crap hole!
Still on the Mirror ...
www.mirror.co.uk
Katie Price reported to RSPCA as 'dogs walk in excrement beside filthy cages'
An insider has claimed that toilet roll can be seen 'strewn across a hard wooden floor' which they claimed is full of 'excrement and grime' at Katie Price's Mucky Mansion
Come on you red tops- we are all eagerly waiting Part 2! Dish the dirt pls!
She’s obviously pissed off whoever runs her page. They’ve probably not been paid.
Information from the CPS. Crown Prosecution Service.
Offences Involving Domestic and Captive Animals
13 July 2018|Legal Guidance
Section 9-Welfare
Under Section 9 of the Act, those responsible for animals have a duty to ensure their welfare. A person commits an offence under Section 9 if he does not take reasonable steps to meet the needs of an animal, which include:
To prove an offence under Section 9, the CPS or RSPCA has to prove therefore:
Section 4-Unnecessary Suffering
To prove an offence under Section 4, the CPS, RSPCA or any person bringing a private prosecution, has to prove:
Offences Involving Domestic and Captive Animals
13 July 2018|Legal Guidance
Section 9-Welfare
Under Section 9 of the Act, those responsible for animals have a duty to ensure their welfare. A person commits an offence under Section 9 if he does not take reasonable steps to meet the needs of an animal, which include:
- A suitable environment
- A suitable diet
- To be able to exhibit normal behavioural patterns
- To be housed with, or apart from, other animals
- To be protected from pain, suffering, injury or disease
To prove an offence under Section 9, the CPS or RSPCA has to prove therefore:
- That the appellant has a responsibility for the animal under Section 3 of the Act;
- The steps that would have been taken by a reasonably competent and humane person in all the circumstances to meet that animal's needs to the extent required by good practice; and
Section 4-Unnecessary Suffering
To prove an offence under Section 4, the CPS, RSPCA or any person bringing a private prosecution, has to prove:
- The animals in question are protected animals under s.2 of the Act;
- The particular appellant's act or failure to act caused the animal to suffer unnecessarily;
- The particular appellant either knew or ought to have known that his or her act or failure to act would cause that suffering or be likely to do so; and
- That the suffering was unnecessary (R. (on the application of Gray) v Aylesbury Crown Court [2013] EWHC 500).
I was reading these particular comments this morning - thank you for taking screenshots and posting, Jaynie. I'm hoping there's a few grains of truth too. Whoever it is commenting, the bit's between the teeth now. These were posted a few minutes ago.Here you go being reasonable again Crowreasonableness is not allowed in respect of KH
Okay, so I grabbed a couple of screenshots from the Mirror’s comments section as they said quite a few interesting things. Apparently they used to be a Tattler and Krustie but are now banned along with FoxTotty. However their comments are very interesting and hopefully aren’t bullshit. I honestly don’t know if they have inside info, as earlier yesterday they were annoyed about how the Skank is getting away with, so … I’m taking it with a grain of salt unless any of our trusted insider Krusties can vouch for any of it, but it is still very, very interesting nonetheless.
Last edited:
drums fingers on desk
Ooooo.... I like being a Krustfluff.... I think the mods should design a hat for us and put it on our Avatars...Any news on Part 2? Wonder what that’s aboutany ideas Krustfluffs?
Look at his face. He takes no nonsense.View attachment 2130855 My 13 year old pain in the arse but well loved kitty
I am going to risk going out, going to get some funny looks when I stand at the check out with 15 B&Q buckets
He is gorgeous rlilly.View attachment 2130855 My 13 year old pain in the arse but well loved kitty
My darling I lost last Oct is my avatar,darling Dave.
Actually she's a she but my fault for not saying
The grammar, spelling and overall tone is pretty distinctive.
I'd be more interested if it was something completely new, rather than mostly from here, but maybe that's just me. Hard to please
She's become a pantomime villain with the looks of a pantomime dame. But it's still publicity, bad obviously but that won't bother her. Being completely ignored would really hurt.
I'd be more interested if it was something completely new, rather than mostly from here, but maybe that's just me. Hard to please
She's become a pantomime villain with the looks of a pantomime dame. But it's still publicity, bad obviously but that won't bother her. Being completely ignored would really hurt.
Give the MM producers a tiny bit of credit. They did actually show a short clip of the dogs out in the hall which was covered in turds and wee....
- Status