She has cash! This is all deflection.It’s still there, funnily enough their last grid post was back in November (they still posting in their stories, so it’s active) and guess what, it’s wanky
View attachment 1082145
Skanky is obviously in need of cash, let the fighting commence.
Welcome back Cloud Chaser. You’ve been missedBut Katie who signed Harvey up with him? A quick Google reveals James Austin is NOT someone you’d want representing a vulnerable adult. Didn’t you yourself post that you had nothing to do with him, yet you still ALLOWED him to act on behave of Harvey. Disgusting!
Who in their right mind would stock that horse s#*tNow she’s on the beg for shops to stock her equestrian range
Hidden cash, that is hopefully now no longer hidden and going to where it should be!She has cash! This is all deflection.
Considering their audience are mainly women who are outraged at other women devaluing domestic violence experiences, they’d be crazy to keep the interview in.For anyone else who wants to write to ITV Lorraine I thought I add this screenshot again in case anyone wanted to include it as proof of what KP said about the bruise being makeup belittling DV.
Do you have the ones from Crawl saying it was all for money please, save me going back over old threads, many thanksFor anyone else who wants to write to ITV Lorraine I thought I add this screenshot again in case anyone wanted to include it as proof of what KP said about the bruise being makeup belittling DV.
I don't know why that LK is still on our tvs, she's had her day in the 80s.. sure she's gobbling someone behind the scenes to keep her 1hr slot a day lol, she's boring afLorraine Kelly is a huge supporter of the McCann’s, says it all!
Do you have the ones from Crawl saying it was all for money please, save me going back over old threads, many thanks
She's just pissed she hasn't got it to spend on holiday, face-lifts, beauty treatments etc.. she doesn't give it all to Harvey, guaranteedWhat a joke what about the 2 million she owes creditors
Doesn’t like when she’s on the receiving end
It's called kharma...Klattie you dopey bitch.....using Harvey again....so she can rip the accounts off....how dare anyone else do it to her.What a joke what about the 2 million she owes creditors
Doesn’t like when she’s on the receiving end
I have these three Carly wrote.Do you have the ones from Crawl saying it was all for money please, save me going back over old threads, many thanks
Dunno if any of these are Tattlers, but Lorraine is aiready getting the criticism, and DV is being highlighted.Considering their audience are mainly women who are outraged at other women devaluing domestic violence experiences, they’d be crazy to keep the interview in.
I wouldn't hold out on any thing sensible coming from them he's based in bedworth the nxt town over from me and they call it BeduffHas anyone contacted Cole's management to gain their views on the allegations and his charge?
But she's made a fortune exploiting Harvey, every way she possibly can. Ironic she owes 3.7 million in creditor debts, yet rants about this. Also a thought. As well as messaging ITV/Lorraine Kelly, copy in the DV charities she represents. They won't be happy.But Katie who signed Harvey up with him? A quick Google reveals James Austin is NOT someone you’d want representing a vulnerable adult. Didn’t you yourself post that you had nothing to do with him, yet you still ALLOWED him to act on behave of Harvey. Disgusting!
Yes, Kp will not be able to talk about things “ because of reasons”, but by golly she will promote the Harvey documentary,the mental elf programme and I bet she touts for further interviews.MM will be talked about, and everything given a positive spin.She will be on a charm offensive,Something didn't sit right with me about that yesterday (no offence to the poster who told us what Kirstie had said btw)
I just can't see ITV telling her where to go when she's got a programme to plug on bbc. Not until everything comes out officially - yes they should do their research about what was said over the weekend, but she's probably been booked for ages and they may need a legal reason to cancel.
She does give them ratings unfortunately
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?