Seeing that her brow line has always been low, bit like that geezer from Cheers
Has the surgeon now just transplanted a face onto a head? The hairline doesn’t make sense. It looks like a rushed autopsy stitch up.
This made me laugh out loud, classic hahaha.
What a vile piece of work she is why would anyone want to stay with her whats in it for then any media is not worth it, beggers believe just bugger off why would any want to stay?!!I believe that he threatened her and was verbally abusive, and that this was witnessed and possibly recorded by someone else, which is why he's been charged. It was then cooked up by Katie and perhaps Kirsty when they realised that it'd be in the papers to imply that he'd punched her, to not only get revenge on him (we've seen how spiteful and vengeful she can be to her previous partners) and of course, for Katie's main motivation in life; money. Everything that followed, eg. Kieran being called to pick up the kids etc, was all part of the lie.
I had never considered it until tonight, perhaps as I am too naive to believe that even she could stoop low enough to make a false claim of domestic violence, but it's all clicking into place for me now. Like others have said, it didn't look like a fresh bruise and coincidentally tied in to her recently having surgery, which could have caused the bruising. At the time I thought it was strange that she went to the papers the next day; from my experience as a social worker and of experiencing domestic violence myself, victims of domestic violence go through a range of emotions including denial, fear, and shame - many find it difficult to enough to show their injuries to their families and the police, let alone the national newspapers straight after for the whole country to see. If it was a bullshit story to make money from the papers then it would explain her reasons for this. The fact that the police escorted Katie & Carl a week or two later to the Mucky Mansion while they were both in HIS car also seemed strange.. the only reason I can think of is that by this point they'd reunited and spun the police the story that it was all down to Kirstie, and were expecting to see her at MM? Or they convinced police that Kirstie had done sort of damage to the house or something of that nature.
Either way, if it is indeed a lie, Carl is such a numpty for putting up with it and staying with her. He says nobody can control Katie.. if that's the case and he can't control or coerce her, then neither could Kirsty. Even if it was Kirstie's brainwave to begin with, it was Katie who executed it. This might be the lowest thing she's ever done.
Any hint as to who they are accusing ? I’m lost. LolI am interested as to why they can’t name who we know they are accusing of all this
Supposedly Kirsty, mankys former managerAny hint as to who they are accusing ? I’m lost. Lol
Don't forget about how she damaged her feet again too!Guys I’m so confused!! He has rambled on his story about his innocence and telling the truth but we are non the wiser as to what did happen?! They are saying nothing happened now, so what was Katie saying she got punched for and had to run for her life and was cut and bruised the next day and her family fetching her belongings I’m so confused
Bingo card ready lolNot that I ever want Cole to stop ranting.But is it such a good idea ( legally speaking ) to do so on insta before his court case.?But at least now we know the truth...his truth..a truth...a version of the truth etc etc.According to him she’s a liar.I don’t care what mind games they play in their toxic playground,but lying about Domestic abuse is as low as you can go.As he said, no one can control Katie Price ,so ultimately she is responsible for the implications of that Sun interview.I don’t excuse Mr Angry either, he is not some innocent wee lamb led to the slaughter.
So, get your Pricey bingo cards really for her excuses.
Vile trolls made me do it.
Evil ex management hypnotised me.
Was abducted by by aliens wot interfered wiv my mind and confused me......don’t believe me?.....they even gave me a new face.
Emily is a werewolf.
I have an evil twin.
The media make up things when you agree to an exclusive for money.
I have very few scruples.
Just a thought.He was very emphatic about having proof in black and white( loved the crayon idea), I wonder if he has cctv footage?
Admittedly, I can’t figure out how cctv could exonerate him.
Those eyes too! ScaryThe attack took place in the early hours of the 23rd August. She did the interview for the Sun on the 24th. The neighbours all heard the shouting and screaming and gave witness statements. He has admitted they had a barney in the street. Why on earth would anyone else be implicated in this? As Cole says ' It's black and white'. I'm glad the police have pursued the matter. Who knows what goes on behind closed doors? They have no-one else to blame but themselves. They both looked off their heads in the afternoon when they posted this pic...
View attachment 1070365
That explains her bizarre new faceIts all blew up in her face big time!
Welcome Carly B.Hello! Long time lurker on here. You have all kept me entertained for months and I’m now totally hooked!
After watching his video rants I got the impression that he’s not disputing that he argued and swore at Katie in the street but he definitely sees this as a different ‘incident’ to the assault/theft/coercive behaviour ‘incident’ He’s cross that the two are being confused and that people still think he punched her. Could his proof be that the Police have recently written to him and told him that he is no longer being investigated for the assault and coercive charge? That would be his black and white proof that the punch etc was nothing to do with him?
He admits to the arguing and swearing in the street but because he thinks such behaviour is no big deal he’s cross that the Police have pinned this charge on him. What’s unclear is when this slanging match happened? Outside Harvey’s house and witnessed by the carer on the night? Or just an argument at a later date? The latest Police statement says the man they arrested following the incident on the 23rd has been charged (factually correct) perhaps they deliberately omitted to say for a totally separate incident and that’s got him really wound up!
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?