Jo opened up her life on a very public platform, she should expect people to have opinions. She has quite a significant following on tiktok and her reach is wide enough that word has obviously got back to her exes family that she had been speaking about them online. Why should they not want to get their version heard? Their story will be bias in their favour, just as Jo's is biased in her favour. Maybe her ex is a
tit dad, we didnt need to know that, but she CHOSE to tell us that, so now we know what her opinion is, we can form our own. Birch chose to tell us he's not a
tit dad, so we can form our own opinions on that too.
We know she reads here, she did a video the other week and I actually commented at the time that I liked the fact she had a sense of humour about someone emptying her wishlist
However, Jo also chose to reveal this lady's name to her followers, a lady who anonymously (as far as her real name was concerned) posted on an Internet forum and now said woman is getting hate from strangers who don't have a clue who she is or what she is like. Sure, Jo gets hate (I've yet to see a creator on tiktok that doesn't get some kind of hate) but, again, she chose to live her life in public, to show her face, to tell tiktok her name and personal life. Birch didn't. I didnt watch all the live, I don't know her name but if I did I sure as
tit wouldn't be searching Facebook to find her so I could tell her what I thought of her cos she told a different version of a story some
bleep from tiktok told me
But Jo knew that's exactly what her followers would do, she will have seen it enough times before with other creators setting their followers on people who don't agree with them.
Oops, sorry, that was a bit of an essay....