Jack Monroe #66 A potato is a potato

Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
Please can someone point me to the unruly labia, not literally? Searches bring up labia everywhere
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Reactions: 21

Look at the difference in pixellation between the two eyes. Specifically on the lash line of the black eye. There has absolutely been some editing going on. In addition to what I expect is make up, squinting and natural eye bags. Man she is absolutely wrong in the head. She may well have some slight natural bruising but its been edited to look worse.

Have to hand it to her though. She is a relentless source of discussion for this thread. Her imagination knows no ends.

ETA: sorry for giant pics, have put behind spoiler!
I think she has used sparkly highlighter and eye shadow because people often call a black eye a shiner. And she has taken it literally.
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Reactions: 25
@Fruitjack some time ago Jack was reminiscing about having to wear 3 pairs of under crackers due to her unruly labia. We didn't make it up!
 
  • Like
  • Haha
  • Sick
Reactions: 25
I hope the hosptial gives her a right bollocking for arsing about.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 7
Christ, I've just had a look on Twitter and some of the comments under that photo are baffling. Why do people think they're somehow scoring Mad Lefty Points by ragging on children and their appearance?

I actually think they look really sweet. They'd have been battered at my rough state primary school, like, but they seem perfectly nice kids. It's exactly the same impulse that led Jackie to say such a vile thing about Cameron's poor son, nothing meaningful to add to the discourse so just be an incurable shithead about someone who isn't really relevant to the argument.

And this, my friends, is why Jack's poverty porn tome will be an abject failure: not only does she have no original primary data (well, none that's been ethics checked...), she doesn't have any theoretical framework for her ranting and thus she's reduced to cheap metaphor and sweeping generalisation. Push your publication date back and read some Bentham, witch.
 
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 39
A very serious discussion ... during which she was replying to tweets.

For the love of God stop mining your own child for content.

And stop exaggerating everything. A conversation about sandwiches with a 10/11 year old takes 2 minutes. Tops. Unless he has a actually left the room while she muses on to herself.
Conversations about the latest computer game, book, or film with my 10 year old could last hours - and still do (now he’s in his 30s). Sandwich shapes - are you kidding me?
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Reactions: 10
Conversations about the latest computer game, book, or film with my 10 year old could last hours - and still do (now he’s in his 30s). Sandwich shapes - are you kidding me?
haha totally! If I want my 10 year old to talk to me I just ask her about Disney conspiracy theory videos She’s watched on YouTube
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Reactions: 15
That's not her sandwich, it is far to tasty
That's not her ham sandwich, it isn't flappy and unruly.


This is her sandwich, with cheap wet ham and greengage slop.

I promise to stop now.
 
  • Haha
  • Like
  • Sick
Reactions: 21
Thinking back to my horrible ex-friend and some of JM's behaviour is so similar it's making me shudder. There would be sweeping statements on SM about food and drink, claims of being a teetotal vegan when the very next day she would be munching a pork pie and telling how pissed on vodka she had been. Shaved head featured and she would binge on ridiculous food like dry readybrek. I always felt a bit sorry for her as she also had a really nice life didn't need to work and pretty much did whatever she wanted to do.
 
  • Like
  • Wow
  • Sad
Reactions: 14
Christ, I've just had a look on Twitter and some of the comments under that photo are baffling. Why do people think they're somehow scoring Mad Lefty Points by ragging on children and their appearance?

I actually think they look really sweet. They'd have been battered at my rough state primary school, like, but they seem perfectly nice kids. It's exactly the same impulse that led Jackie to say such a vile thing about Cameron's poor son, nothing meaningful to add to the discourse so just be an incurable shithead about someone who isn't really relevant to the argument.
100% agree with this. When you see vicious comments like that it tells you more about the person making them than the object of their vitriol. Nobody is "evil". There is no much nastiness around.
 
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 11
Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.