I do think it's very poor form for the photographer to show her child's face. Unless of course she actively wanted them too.The photographer would have been there looking for anyone vaguely famous and they would have sold it.
I do think it's very poor form for the photographer to show her child's face. Unless of course she actively wanted them too.The photographer would have been there looking for anyone vaguely famous and they would have sold it.
there’s nothing gender non conforming about declaring that one’s personality traits are incompatible with one’s sex. It’s an act of reinforcement of gendered norms to assert that rejecting them might mean your personality isn’t aligned with your sexed body. It’d be gender non-conforming if Jack simply rejected norms of femininity without the implication that in doing so she isn’t a woman.Amen. She's a bad shithouse who's made gender non conforming folk look like cranks. That's not arthritis, it's bad knees from relentless bandwagon jumping. She's an abhorrent, self interested coke fiend.
Imagine going to an act of public mourning dressed as the third member of Wham with your kid in tow? She does my bleeping head in. Truly.
His followers are quite obsessive too.....just enjoying my morning coffee whilst flicking through the Bible and was instantly reminded just how I'm very much like Jesus.
He knew how to knock up a decent meal with scant ingredients, was relentlessly persecuted, and they literally wanted him to stop breathing for it too.
Makes you think.
the photo I posted was from her public facebook page. She’s only started giving him privacy now he’s in secondary. Before that she didn’t give a titI do think it's very poor form for the photographer to show her child's face. Unless of course she actively wanted them too.
It wasn't Sharon Osbourne was it? She has form for sending poo in the post.When I worked at a Gay club back in the 80's we had human tit sent to us. It was a bit of a shock the first time, but the real thing for me was the fact that someone had taken the time to...
tit somewhere they could pick it up
Pick it up and put into an envelope
Find out our addresses
Pay for the stationary and postage stamps
Walk to a postbox
Be so full of hatred they spent their time doing this
On topic, Jack is still a...
head.
Shame it’s only wrongs she has.She does nothing for trans rights, or woman's rights, or LGBT+ rights. The only rights she’s interested in are her own.
What do we think she was trying to cover up with this? The anniversary of the thread that led to the VBI? If so, it's worked - no-one's asked her about it at all today.It's worked for her so many times before. Carry on waffling about some tit or other, get loads of engagement and bury whatever nonsense went before. She's contradicted herself so much at this point everything she tweets has several different angled viewpoints of why she should shut the f up
For someone who moans about others taking up space, she sure does occupy a lot of poverty space.No one cares about her one man band of struggles from ten years ago. Like she keeps saying times have changed as do people shes not poor now so stop pretending you are.
Plus, this also sounds really goodWas just looking to see who stocks Grifty Kitchen and found this. Even the name of the book isn’t original!
Edit: added a spoiler as the screenshot makes for a long post.
I believe there is some level of choice there. I don’t know how it works because I’m not famous but even a lay person can notice that in the tabloids, some celebs kids faces are always blurred when captured at events while others are always visible so presumably there is a way to say “please don’t publish my child’s face” that they respect.I do think it's very poor form for the photographer to show her child's face. Unless of course she actively wanted them too.
The ‘nature of her work’? She hardly works down the pit does she?And Shrunken Head Jack’s flowery boilersuits
View attachment 1894262
And Jack’s denim boilersuits (just like Beloved Slumlord Grandad’s who is DEAD)
View attachment 1894272
And Jack’s well…everything really. IT’S THE NATURE OF HER WORK TO NEED A ~SPARE~ OKAAAAY? Do you want her to STOP BREATHING?
View attachment 1894275(thanks to @Veronicaaa @Marmalade Atkins and @Silver Linings for the screenies)
Yeah, that's what I find odd about these pics - if she "fiercely guarded" his privacy, she'd ask for them to be removed or blurred. She isn't hugely famous, and he certainly isn't, so generally agencies respect parental wishes to keep their children out of pics. The fact that she slapped his face everywhere, like that photo shoot in Leggy's kitchen where her child's face is hidden and his is shown, shows that she just doesn't give a tit about his privacy and he's just an accessoryI believe there is some level of choice there. I don’t know how it works because I’m not famous but even a lay person can notice that in the tabloids, some celebs kids faces are always blurred when captured at events while others are always visible so presumably there is a way to say “please don’t publish my child’s face” that they respect.