Is she suggesting that having tattoos is a requirement for being trans/non-binary?!She had some of them pre-Poverty:
View attachment 1639065
(Don't zoom in on the fingernails. It's not worth it.)
Is she suggesting that having tattoos is a requirement for being trans/non-binary?!She had some of them pre-Poverty:
View attachment 1639065
(Don't zoom in on the fingernails. It's not worth it.)
Thought the same. The photo is not as flattering as she thinks it is.The pic she posted of SB on a rug in 'too small trousers', etc... looking absolutely normal for a kid at that age shows a rug. On a decent wooden floor. Carpets are hardly compulsory!
Damn that's terrible posture.
Incorrect. She changed her name just as she resigned from the fire service - ie pre-Poverty.Back when she was originally in "poverty as she describes it" she was still Melissa. Jack came when she realised she could make money from people. And did.
2 boilersuits don't forget....She must surely bore herself by now. It must be irritating not to be able to freely enjoy the things you’ve earned. I splurged on a pair of boots this week (payday, Klarna and the fact they will change my life for the better in every way and go with EVERYTHING even my safety pin jumper dresses.)
I don’t need to hide them so my enemies don’t see them or pretend I found them/was given them/bought in a Cats Protection shop for 76p. I can just wear them and explain nothing to anyone. That’s a simple thing but I don’t think Jack knows how that feels. All her purchases come with a backstory, a deep and meaningful reason for owning it and it’s all a lie. She can’t just say ‘I bought it because I wanted it and earned the money for it.’
She tries to justify things like a frivolous floral boiler suit purchases while telling journalists and followers that she doesn’t have lightbulbs. It must be exhausting and I just can’t imagine it’s worth it. With a decentish job and a credit card/enough credit to pay in 3 she could own all that stuff anyway. The grift is pointless.![]()
She did claim benefits, but wanted to do her crafting and claim tax credits rather than making her claim much simpler by claiming income support and not working at all ( at that time there was no requirement to work due to the age of her son.) This was all played out on an old Facebook account that was deleted once she became known, as what was on there didn't tally with what she had told the media. I used to read all the comments on that Facebook account from people imploring her to make her life simple, but she refused. She seemed to just enjoy the attention, going over the same ground over and over. No receipts due to the deletion of the account many moons ago.I remember reading on here that Jack had refused to claim benefits back in the poverty because “mummy works”. But when I search for anything to do with benefits I can only find the usual crap. Anyone have receipts? I think it was her old Facebook posts where she said she didn’t claim.
LFC doesn't know she's born, does she?Oh, PS she quit an actual job to do that stuff too, despite lots of people expressing reservations about this being a wise course of action.
Yeah, yet again she sounds like she’s in the direst of circumstances and abject poverty here, right?![]()
Self Employed Single Mummy: Week Three
So, I’m officially in Week Three of self-employed single mummy status. Week three? Where has that time gone? Well so far it’s gone on two exhausting but successful preview days at the Work Of Art G...web.archive.org
Oh and this is nothing to do with her crafting, but is yet another very interesting post- for many reasons…
ETA yet more evidence she’s always been a shameless self publicist. This is her highlighting a letter ‘someone’ wrote that was published in the newspaper she worked at. An early![]()
Poppyright.
One thing I've noticed this year, is a distinct lack of red paper poppies pinned to the lapels of the general public. I'm sitting in a coffee shop at the moment, with a quick head count of 27 other...web.archive.org
![]()
View attachment 1638269
It has the distinct whiff of Mark ‘Reputation Management’ Lewis about it if you ask me.Going back to the Faux Laura Kuenssberg on Twitter, is anyone still looking at the replies for the suing Lee Anderson guff? Because, dear Canal, with the exception of about two posts, the rest are overwhelmingly positive. Lots asking how they can donateShe’s the best of us
and all the other boohockey we’ve come to know and hate. Has Jack gone around Twitter with a damn Men in Black mind wiping pen or what? It’s really sickening.
Of course the real question is why has it been posted in the first place? Jack kicked that off in May (was it then, I can’t remember) and then it was confirmed that she’d done tit about it and had pocketed the loot that had already been sent. Are people that dense (rhetorical) that they don’t realise it’s old news and nothing has come of it or, and this seems the most obvious, Jack is somehow changing the narrative and trying to lure more people into her failing grift.
Soz for the long rambly post, it’s like there’s some imaginary word count I’m trying to reach.
Ah, fair enough. I just thought it would be an easy way to resolve this particular situation, but not if you're not in contact any more and it risks causing you problems.Not withoutmyself unfortunately.
Please note 'taps screen'She was claiming benefits while running the craft business, per the Sunday People:
View attachment 1639015
Yeah, not being funny but all the pics I've seen of her from the years of The Pov, her flat looks really nice. Like that pic right there in your post. Dry, nice furniture, modern.View attachment 1638997
“No carpets for TWO YEARS” = “the place I lived had laminate floors”. Also I know pics can deceive, but those pics of her home from the Guardian, Mirror and other pieces from 2012 and 2013 do not look like a place that’s damp or mouldy or anything else. Further, NO journalist at the time in any article from any publication, many of whom visited her at her home, makes mention of the damp or mould, which they surely would have? Yet she’s constantly milking that to this day.
View attachment 1639001
i chopped off their faces as wanted to show the floor but not SB and didn’t like/want to ‘squiggle out’ all over his face.
Christ on a BIKE she does THREE HOURS job trial and she thinks she's Ada ColemanNot sure why in May 2012 she needed to sign up to get a degree (or two) when as we all know, in March 2012 she already had one. This one in March must have been in something other than “Social Policy and Criminology alongside a BA(Hons) in PPE”, I suppose.
View attachment 1639193
Also, if she’s signed up to do “a degree” in Social Policy and Crim, what does the dozy dipshit think it is, other than a Bachelor’s degree like a “BA(Hons)” I see she’s always been terrific at researching her stories before posting her shite.
MonthlyPlease note 'taps screen'
£20 toiletries
£40 food
Her tattoos are just so, so bad. That first cover up was shocking, and then having to go for the super thick black second cover up to hide it allI tried working out a timeline of tattoos while I was scrolling through her insta. But obviously it doesn't go back to the pov era.
The photo posted by colouredlines is, according to Jack, from 2011.
By November 2013 at the latest the skull tattoo has been covered (badly) with the floral piece. Looks like some other stuff has been added on as well?
View attachment 1639264
She posted a picture of this one in September 2012, it's unclear when she got it.
View attachment 1639282
Two stills also from Dec 2013
View attachment 1639267
View attachment 1639269
When I say that the flower cover-up was bad, I mean it was dire.
View attachment 1639287
View attachment 1639304
Not sure how many she started with but by June 2015 she's up to 28 tatts.
View attachment 1639293
She went "on tour" to the USA in August/September 2015 and got this monstrosity. I'd ask her to cover it in professional contexts too.
View attachment 1639303
View attachment 1639294
View attachment 1639295
By April 2016 the skull/rose is covered up again and we are somehow at 40-odd tattoos!
View attachment 1639309
This utter nonsense was made permanent in late 2016.
View attachment 1639313
And then in 2017 she's broke and begging for money again. Makes you think.
I wonder where this poor woman is now, and if she's still a fan.
View attachment 1639316
So bleeping professional, Jack
View attachment 1639318
And last but not least
View attachment 1639319
Jack and potatoes is never not going to bring a smile to my face.
OhLFC doesn't know she's born, does she?
Lie upon lie upon lie. The deception goes so deep. So many different personas, different stories to different publications. Wonder if there’s some Action Fraud detective trying to piece it altogether.Not sure why in May 2012 she needed to sign up to get a degree (or two) when as we all know, in March 2012 she already had one. This one in March must have been in something other than “Social Policy and Criminology alongside a BA(Hons) in PPE”, I suppose.
View attachment 1639193
Also, if she’s signed up to do “a degree” in Social Policy and Crim, what does the dozy dipshit think it is, other than a Bachelor’s degree like a “BA(Hons)” I see she’s always been terrific at researching her stories before posting her shite.
They’re bad for sure, but for me the absolute worst is the edgelord “find what you love and let it kill you” one. I’d like to ask her exactly what it means, because I sure as hell don’t know (I know it’s a quote) although I suspect her reply would be something condescending like if you have to ask you’ll never understand.Her tattoos are just so, so bad. That first cover up was shocking, and then having to go for the super thick black second cover up to hide it allThey're not unique either, I'd say I was fairly unusual nowadays in not having any tbh.