I wonder if behind the scenes, Jack Montoe or a FM has let this dog groomer person know they've identified her and her workplace/business, and there's likely yo be consequences.....
I wonder if behind the scenes, Jack Montoe or a FM has let this dog groomer person know they've identified her and her workplace/business, and there's likely yo be consequences.....The groomer has caved and apologised/ tried to justify her actions. I’m feeling a slight waft of Monroe in these posts. You don’t think.. it was JM all along? After all the inception of the FD acc was after Content post? Did she create her own chaos to liven a snowy night in Southend?
Makes you think
yes but has also significantly helped Jack to reframe her situation coveneniently. I could see this a mile off, which is why it was bizarre to see these threads getting on board the“dog not sufficiently groomed” chaos when it was always going to work in Jack’s favourThat person has shown more self-reflection in that single post than Jack has done in 10 years.
I wouldn't put it past Monroe's FMs to try and discredit squig groomer's business online. Maybe they already have.I really feel sorry for the squig now. And being called right wing is the trademark of the FM. Hope Content gets to the groomers at some point, poor pup.
The FMs are beyond thick. It's a long standing embarrassment that Jack has been embraced by any part of the left. She advocates thrift and austerity with her hideous recipes and any time she tries to comment on a bigger issue makes an utter clown of herself because she's a lazy barely educated thicko. If I was conspiracy minded I'd say she and her FMs were some sort of Tory plants. Lets face it, they give them such easy pickings, all they need to do is attract their attention then stand back and say "look, it's the tolerant left" and they've made their point.I really feel sorry for the squig now. And being called right wing is the trademark of the FM. Hope Content gets to the groomers at some point, poor pup.
Controversial opinion.This actually makes it (unbelievably) even more disturbing isn't it. Like it wasn't just for attention, it was a payback and more hurt via hurting the kitten?
Maybe I am just too far gone into seeing things but....
I put it entirely down to selfishness and narcissism. She put what she wanted ahead of what the kitten needed.Controversial opinion.
I honestly don't think Jack deliberately caused suffering to the kitten, she just was too involved in her own narrative to see. And Vix a plus pass for Kitty was a truly vile enabler
I think she's decided she's Jack Monroe bestest to the animals EVURRR and therefore just by being in her presence they have the best life. She has absolutely no way of hearing criticism or advice so stubbornly won't learn or listen and thinks whatever she's doing is best for them because after all she's saintly Jack. Having pets fits her image. Them dying doesn't so she just scrubs that out of the story mostly. With the kitten she could frame it as giving tragic lil one the bestest love and care possible for her short life because after all she carried her in a sling and whatever.Controversial opinion.
I honestly don't think Jack deliberately caused suffering to the kitten, she just was too involved in her own narrative to see. And Vix a plus pass for Kitty was a truly vile enabler
If you watch that disgusting monetised video (which I do not recommend) she was quite obviously using the kitten for clout. The outcome she was after was treatment from Supervet, the kitten saved and everyone blowing smoke and cashos up Jack's arse for not listening to those evil vets who told her to get kitty put down. Unsurprisingly, the vets were right and we know that sad story ended.I put it entirely down to selfishness and narcissism. She put what she wanted ahead of what the kitten needed.
There probably weren't any that matched her colour scheme.She does know that you can actually buy books written by experts that detail how you can appropiately care for your breed of dog? They are realatively inexpensive and suitable for all ages. My mum bought me one when i got my first dog at the age of ten, to show me the repsobilities i would have.
That behavior is somewhat akin to what medieval kings did with their enemies. They would *grisly spoiler* decapitate their enemies and display their heads on spears or spikes around the castle or a town centre as a warning to anyone thinking of attempting the same. Jack is using retribution and the fear of it to control her narrative.I think she does it as a warning to other people not to criticise her, as well.
It took me almost 30 years to recognise and break free from mine. When you live with one, they essentially indoctrinate you and it's harder to recognise if it started when you the victim were a child. It becomes your normal until you discover otherwise.Absolutely. I feel like such an idiot for taking so long to spot it.
Good luck trying to find who they are? I Googled "dog groomers Thorpe Bay" and found it immediately“Liars and abusers” for *checks notes* questioning whether the dog has recently been groomed
Edit - that’s the person Jack tagged to provoke a pile on
My kind of chocolate balance tooJust found this 2019 vintage and sending it right off to the VBI! Such useful data entry points - paste £1.50 (I think it was miso) and frozen veg 99p
View attachment 1619808
Boris was the same. Oh look at the buffoon with his poorly buttoned shirt.There is an author who writes about Trump's dodgy dealing who explains his ways sort of like this as well. He's happy for people to focus on idiotic things (like when he tweeted a nonsensical word) to keep the attention away from the structural criminal set ups he is involved with. Focus on Monroes dumb things (however entertaining for us) detracts from the big issues around lack of accountability (lack of accountability that actual charities would be taken over the coals for).
Not saying we shouldn't mention the idiotic here though! That's what Tattle is for and why I also like it here too (not sure who made the 'feed me' picture of the godawful kitchen rug this week but it had me). In a way it's a shame Content's matted hair has taken away fromt he teeth in that picture. What the fuck is up with that facetune????
To be fair if she googled it would lead her right here where her username has been mentioned a few times...it does read like they might have read the criticism hereI wonder if behind the scenes, Jack Montoe or a FM has let this dog groomer person know they've identified her and her workplace/business, and there's likely yo be consequences.....
For a moment I thought you were talking about the grotesque video of her moaning and eyefucking the camera while the kitten nuzzled her naked chest but then remembered there were multiple videos involving the poor thing.If you watch that disgusting monetised video (which I do not recommend) she was quite obviously using the kitten for clout. The outcome she was after was treatment from Supervet, the kitten saved and everyone blowing smoke and cashos up Jack's arse for not listening to those evil vets who told her to get kitty put down. Unsurprisingly, the vets were right and we know that sad story ended.
I think there are accounts that come to TL threads and used what they read here to troll JM, that account was an example. There’s genuine concern and then there’s throwing flares all over the comments. If they wanted a reaction out of JM they succeeded.To be honest, if I posted a comment on someone's Insta and a random brand new account appeared to shout at me about their dog's fur being matted, I'd probably be just as unimpressed as Jack's fans are.
This is just a weird concern troll account. Most of their comments weren't even directed at Jack, they were responding to her followers.
Vastly different from when Jack sics the hounds on a real account for something innucuous.
And me !BIB: Say what?? Can you explain that bit for me please? Thanks
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?