Mad thing is it looks like a tit motivational photoshop from MySpace circa 2002Without the rice paper dog, this just looks a bit crap.
Add in the dog and it goes to a whole different level of batshit.
Mad thing is it looks like a tit motivational photoshop from MySpace circa 2002Without the rice paper dog, this just looks a bit crap.
Add in the dog and it goes to a whole different level of batshit.
They have posted recently apologising and saying they have an obsessive personality.I do feel like the FD person posting multiple times on the post was excessive and intended to get the reaction it did. Hey bear, here's my stick, poke, poke, poke.
She's just too easy to bait, you'd think she'd learn. Just delete, block and maybe say "doggo does look a bit scruffy but booked in with a pro next week! (My poor wallet send cash)"
It's just like the potatoes, she's got one tool in her box - escalate!
Also if SS do get involved, they can actually be a good useful resource. Their aim is always where possible to keep families together, for as long as it is in the best interests of the child. Despite popular opinion they're not there to make people feel or snatch children away.Agree.
Also if you take Jack at face value then since SB was born she has done sex work, been an alcoholic, passed out so many times he's used to it, "lived rough", lived in a house share with 5 adults, expressed suicidal wishes (plus implied attempts), shared her own experience of CSA and how her stalker still lives very close to her, used food banks regularly, lived without a fridge, lightbulbs or hot water...
None of those make her a bad mum, but I would hope that social services are aware of her as all of those things present an increased risk to SBs welfare.
In fact, it's probably her middle class privilege that means they're not *more* involved. (Assuming any of it is true...)
Nice looking roasties crispy and cooked
I also think your mum having a tattoo on her hand that says ‘Find what you love and let it kill you‘ would be really frightening for a childAgree.
Also if you take Jack at face value then since SB was born she has done sex work, been an alcoholic, passed out so many times he's used to it, "lived rough", lived in a house share with 5 adults, expressed suicidal wishes (plus implied attempts), shared her own experience of CSA and how her stalker still lives very close to her, used food banks regularly, lived without a fridge, lightbulbs or hot water...
None of those make her a bad mum, but I would hope that social services are aware of her as all of those things present an increased risk to SBs welfare.
In fact, it's probably her middle class privilege that means they're not *more* involved. (Assuming any of it is true...)
Yeah, if she was actually applying she would at least be getting interviews for pretty much every social media role.Weirdly (haha, joking) we have not heard a peep about what happened to those hundereds of job applications that she sent out during HH2
Nah she just means when we all say “should we report this to action fraud”I've never had a invite to the convening of the canal/coven where we plan a coordinated and sustained attack by repeatedly reporting her to multiple agencies . She's full of tit. I work in social housing for a large local authority. I work with the agencies she's mentioned, even the RSPCA. Multiple agency working rarely happens until there's a major crisis trigger. It's just not happening, Jack . In any case, according to her, Celeb Squad is monitoring and protecting 24/7 behind the scenes so she should be fine.
Exactly. I've posted about my sister in law's issues so I won't go into detail. But once SS and other agencies got involved and she was willing to have support (she'd very much hit rock bottom), her life and her children's lives completely changed for the better. No one 'took the children away'. We did family foster while she got individual help, always with the goal that this gave her time to sort herself out, sort a lovely new and safe family home in a different part of the UK. Almost 2 decades later they are all still very much together and always have been.Also if SS do get involved, they can actually be a good useful resource. Their aim is always where possible to keep families together, for as long as it is in the best interests of the child. Despite popular opinion they're not there to make people feel or snatch children away.
grief thief, poverty tourist, faux minority, counterfeit victim and pile-on instigator.I was thinking about Jacks grenfell post, then about the dead dog breakfast bowl (amongst other things), and I was getting really bleeping annoyed and angry with her about how she uses other peoples trauma for her own benefit. Grrrr, and then I thought, I know what she is, she’s a bleeping grief thief.
She might not be neglecting the dog (although that's a matter that's up for discussion), but she sure as hell neglected dash, and that's before we talk about the guinea pigs she killed.Demanding an apology now cause ya know butter fingers
This actually makes it (unbelievably) even more disturbing isn't it. Like it wasn't just for attention, it was a payback and more hurt via hurting the kitten?She also got a deformed kitten after Louisa left and called it Sophie, neglected it and it died.
bleeping hell. Jack causes hurt wherever she goes doesn't she? When she posted that stupid IT'S PLAITS NOT BRAIDS thirst shot on Instagram that descended into mayhem with posters being utterly vile to a woman of colour.The groomer has caved and apologised/ tried to justify her actions. I’m feeling a slight waft of Monroe in these posts. You don’t think.. it was JM all along? After all the inception of the FD acc was after Content post? Did she create her own chaos to liven a snowy night in Southend?
Makes you think
I agree with that, it's a way of preventing criticism whilst also underhand criticising the person it is being directed at. Often corresponds with people weaponising Caroline Flack's death.completely agree. The “Be Kind” stuff is to me, a form of toxicity. I do illustrations, and so many of the places on social media where I get work are plagued with people who use app filters on photosm or who do a 2 minute form of smudging on digital photos to make them look like paintings, or just flat out trace photos, and then vastly undercut the prices of artists who put skill and time into their work. They get called out, but there are so many enablers who see any form of accountability as “unkindness” and who think that anything that’s offered up as “creativity” is (another annoying word) “valid”
That person has shown more self-reflection in that single post than Jack has done in 10 years.The groomer has caved and apologised/ tried to justify her actions. I’m feeling a slight waft of Monroe in these posts. You don’t think.. it was JM all along? After all the inception of the FD acc was after Content post? Did she create her own chaos to liven a snowy night in Southend?
Makes you think
I really feel sorry for the squig now. And being called right wing is the trademark of the FM. Hope Content gets to the groomers at some point, poor pup.The groomer has caved and apologised/ tried to justify her actions. I’m feeling a slight waft of Monroe in these posts. You don’t think.. it was JM all along? After all the inception of the FD acc was after Content post? Did she create her own chaos to liven a snowy night in Southend?
Makes you think