Edited because I started to talk about my menopause *wineHas anyone cleverer than moi done a sex swap pic thing of him and Jack?
I recall an interview with him discussing a drug den that he robbed.
Trsut me, Jack was never a sex worker. The shitting dog would have been eaten alive on her first shift. It's just more pov wank fantasy for the neckbeard mention men.Jack is secretly a tory, Jack claims she hates torys yet dated alagra mcevedy when she was going through her lesbian phase. Jack also worked as a sex worker, not paying taxes and claiming benefits for being a single mum (despite jonnys dad having shared custody) she must be fiddling tax because how does one woman afford to rent such a nice bungalow in one of the nicest areas in the UK, she only wears designer brands, has a designer dog, £150 a month ritalin prescription, lip fillers, the list goes on. Jack will say its libel though cause anything that rings true that doesn't fit her narrative is libel.
Imagine buying designer clothes but using shampoo to wash clothes and boiled soap for shower gel, definitely doesn't have her priorities straight.
I've been back at work this week, in a poorly paid job, JACK, try it! I have to say that Jenny numbers not only shares my real life name (shortened formEdited because I started to talk about my menopause *wine
Not quite sure what I’ve done here, I seem to have spoilered half the post and not the other. I’m not sure how to fix it. Is there a friendly moderate in the house?So by 23.07 Jack had deleted the tweet asking for donations to her PayPal accountOur intrepid heroine seems to have returned around 9.45. She immediately took aim at Martin Daubney.
View attachment 1569604
She then discovered Lawrence Fox, cad that he is, had donated £5 to her appeal. She immediately donated his fiver to the Trussel Fund. Given that, it is perhaps not unreasonable to assume that is where all the unneeded donations went. They are a worthy cause close to Jacks heart ( see Tee Mill).
View attachment 1569607
Fearing Daubney was unaware of who he was up against, Jack sensibly decided to enlighten him. Alas, Mr Daubney seemed unimpressed.
View attachment 1569612
You’re wondering about Pat aren’t you? Wonder no longer…
View attachment 1569653
Anything seemed possible on that exciting night
View attachment 1569672
But there was a certain unhappiness brewing. Questions were beginning to be asked….
View attachment 1569673
.. and not all of them from Lozza.
View attachment 1569674
View attachment 1569680
By 1.12 pm Saturday 14th May, Jack was able to share with us that she had instructed her lawyer. Is poor Pat in included under “and co”? Surely not!
View attachment 1569693
After this stern announcement, little was shared about the upcoming case until May 20, when Jack confirmed that lawyers letters had been fired off and public apologies demanded. The interesting bit is at around 11.02 although it’s all good. Jack tells Us all about her 120 hour week. It’s very moving.
Fortunately, given that I can find no apologies from any of the gentlemen named by Jack, by May 28th she had a crack team of paralegals on the case
View attachment 1569714
So is there an ongoing lawsuit or have matters been quietly settled out of court?
Happily, from our point of view none of that matters, because as recently as August 26th, Jack tweeted this…
View attachment 1569726
I can hardly contain my excitement to find out exactly how much money was donated to Jacks PayPal account that night. The Trussell fund must surely have received more than Lozzas fiver. Or perhaps the money went to some other, equally worthy, cause?
Just tell us Jack, you know you’re dying too and after all transparency isn’t just for tories,
It’s not perfect but pretty much everything that matters is there I think. Some kind mod will hopefully fix the mess i made of the second part.Great work @GrannyOgg! I'm currently making a black pudding and blue cheese pie with your name on it to thank you for everything you do.
(But seriously, great work!)
I think this was a good step, whoever took it. If she claimed to be collecting the money for charity *or indeed* if she misrepresented her financial circumstances to trick people to send money then that is fraud.It looks like Molly herself contacted Action Fraud under the advice of the fundraising regulator.View attachment 1569647View attachment 1569648
Edit: apologies, for minor chaos, looks like it was indeed a third party who filed the report
View attachment 1569649
I think you need to squiggle the @names in the repliesQuoting myself like a ninny this is part one, I thinks there’s just too much to put in one post. I’m having difficulty forcing myself to leave stuff out.
This is my latest favourite Jenny numbers post, I think about it every time I brush my teeth. “Just a blob of Colgate”I've been back at work this week, in a poorly paid job, JACK, try it! I have to say that Jenny numbers not only shares my real life name (shortened form) but is the Frau who regularly makes me
Also isn't James Dyson a Tory Brexit loving arsehole who cut jobs and or wages? I could be confusing him with someone else though. But if not then Jack is endorsing a fellow crony.See squigs, your money is going on over-hyped & expensive Dysons. My Miele is much better (& a LOT cheaper) than my old Dyson and I gather that many other brands are also better than those made by that hypocritical suction-botherer.
Here’s part one so they are fairly close togetherLet us defer to the Observer for a brief explanation of how Jack versus Lee Anderson, Martin Daubney, Laurence Fox and a bloke called Pat
…The row began after deputy leader of the Reclaim Party, Martin Daubney, posted a clip of an interview he had conducted with Anderson.
At the start of the clip, Daubney refers to Monroe as the “self-appointed representative of the impoverished”, adding she has “sold loads of books. Done quite well out of it. No doubt, probably earns more than the prime minister”. Anderson responds by stating: “She’s taking money off some of the most vulnerable people in society and making an absolute fortune on [sic] the back of people.”…
( Observer 15 May 2022)
Jack immediately leapt into action. At 5.25 on the 13th May she retweeted the offending video, tagging the lawyer who represented her when she successfully sued Katie Hopkins.
View attachment 1569434
Interestingly, as I write this, the vile video with its career wrecking accusations is still on our heroines timeline, softly, gently ticking up views. All part of her cunning legal strategy I am sure.
At 18.02 Jack tweeted this. It was obvious she meant business.
View attachment 1569488
Jack continued to tag her lawyer throughout the evening of the 13th, keeping him up to date with the fast moving situation
View attachment 1569419
Not perhaps quite as often as she counted the number of views of the video
View attachment 1569438
And she did make time to let us know this interesting fact
View attachment 1569447
At 7.31 however our heroine seemed to become unsure whether her lawyer had the capacity to accommodate her and, possibly sensitive to the accusations laid against her, she added an important rider to her tweet. She would donate the cash if it wasn’t needed and anyone who couldn’t afford it was to donate. A huge relief to me in particular, mid month is always a difficult time.
View attachment 1569462Unfortunately, no doubt caught up in heat of the moment and keen to help the peoples poverty Princess, not everyone listened
View attachment 1569490
We will take up the story later that night when Jack returned to our screens.
My toxic trait is that I actually like this, although I wish there was less soilThere's always this which could also be your inspiration dear heart...
View attachment 1569659
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?