Oh my god the make up! I’m sorry if that will cause any offence but all I can think of is Amber Heard and donating vs pledging etc etc
1 or 5. Maybe a slight possibility of 2, using bad mentals as an excuse for the inconsistencies.She's being so much quieter than usual isn't she ninnies. Like Bobby Fischer, considering her next move.
It's actually not that obvious what her next move should be. If I were her, I'd see several options, but they all have drawbacks:
1. Try to style it out and come back after 24 hours with the usual weak banter about favourite Oreo flavours / easter egg brands, generally act as if nothing's happened. Drawback: people will keep asking questions and making criticisms, and it will look bad to let them go unanswered.
2. Address Molly in more detail, explaining why their thread was 'false' and 'abusive'. Drawback: really hard to refute your own words, or to claim that everything's been faked. She could argue that the Twitter screenies have been faked (athough quite hard to claim this about tweets which many others will recall seeing), harder to do with an archived WaPo article or a podcast made by someone else.
3. Announce her retirement fromgriftingcampaigning. Drawback is that this may come with refund demands from Patreon supporters. Can she afford to do this given that the Patreon money has likely all been spent over years of impulsive spending decisions?
4. DFE and go dark. Drawback is that Jack is physically unable tolielive without Twitter attention and seems not to have IRL friends.
5. Do a chaos or have a Jaccident. But people are increasingly wise to this deflection activity.
She's actually not in an easy position. If she'd been called out four or five years ago, she'd have had more options, but her behaviour has just continued becoming ever more outlandish and rapacious, the lies have got stupider, and she has backed herself further and further into a corner.
I hate the phrase 'you have no one to blame but yourself' as it's so often used to shame people who are victims of bad circs and vulnerability. But in jack's case, I can't really think of a phrase that is more apt.
SHE LEFT in May 2020, just how long is this infernal fixed contract supposed to be!
I think those are two separate threadsMixed bag of mithering in this thread.
View attachment 1466116
This takes me back to parallel universe Jack, who was savvy enough to see the amazing opportunity she'd been handed and is a low key but competent budget cook/campaigner. Not a millionaire but making a nice living. Instead we got griftesaurus. I think more than anything it's the total waste that infuriates me. I think she'll just end up grifting from a smaller and smaller group of squigs until it all grinds to a halt.She's being so much quieter than usual isn't she ninnies. Like Bobby Fischer, considering her next move.
It's actually not that obvious what her next move should be. If I were her, I'd see several options, but they all have drawbacks:
1. Try to style it out and come back after 24 hours with the usual weak banter about favourite Oreo flavours / easter egg brands, generally act as if nothing's happened. Drawback: people will keep asking questions and making criticisms, and it will look bad to let them go unanswered.
2. Address Molly in more detail, explaining why their thread was 'false' and 'abusive'. Drawback: really hard to refute your own words, or to claim that everything's been faked. She could argue that the Twitter screenies have been faked (athough quite hard to claim this about tweets which many others will recall seeing), harder to do with an archived WaPo article or a podcast made by someone else.
3. Announce her retirement fromgriftingcampaigning. Drawback is that this may come with refund demands from Patreon supporters. Can she afford to do this given that the Patreon money has likely all been spent over years of impulsive spending decisions?
4. DFE and go dark. Drawback is that Jack is physically unable tolielive without Twitter attention and seems not to have IRL friends.
5. Do a chaos or have a Jaccident. But people are increasingly wise to this deflection activity.
She's actually not in an easy position. If she'd been called out four or five years ago, she'd have had more options, but her behaviour has just continued becoming ever more outlandish and rapacious, the lies have got stupider, and she has backed herself further and further into a corner.
I hate the phrase 'you have no one to blame but yourself' as it's so often used to shame people who are victims of bad circs and vulnerability. But in jack's case, I can't really think of a phrase that is more apt.
ICONIC!Who'd have thought that The Big Reveal turned out not to be Jack's begging blog, but Molly's thread using Jack's own words. Ironic.
Well that explains no listing for Daz or soap on her itemised expenditure then....A search for "rent" on her Twitter is enlightening. For any new fraus - this is why we don't believe anything she says even though she claims that it is impossible for her to lie because autism.
View attachment 1466013View attachment 1466015View attachment 1466016View attachment 1466017
Hopefully someone from GMTV, The Guardian and any brands foolish enough to be thinking about using Jack will have seen the recent chaos and have second thoughtsThis takes me back to parallel universe Jack, who was savvy enough to see the amazing opportunity she'd been handed and is a low key but competent budget cook/campaigner. Not a millionaire but making a nice living. Instead we got griftesaurus. I think more than anything it's the total waste that infuriates me. I think she'll just end up grifting from a smaller and smaller group of squigs until it all grinds to a halt.
Yes, or copy and paste the text of the post.Are we able to screenshot from MN?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?