duct tape and prayers, not Cotwolds then
Facts are for Tories. Evidence is anti-poor. Jack is right about everything, it's the ONS that are wrong.
Yeah, everyone knows they could just take the more expensive stuff and swap it in the value packaging.She's trying to backpedal and talk about more people forced to buy non value because she claims it'll be out of stock due to increased demands. I'm going to assume she knows nothing about supermarket supply chains.
View attachment 1305064
Supermarket suPply chains you say? If only we had a hero who understands these…..excuse me while I go and check a certain MR Dresserman’s twitter, I’ll report back if he has entered the convoShe's trying to backpedal and talk about more people forced to buy non value because she claims it'll be out of stock due to increased demands. I'm going to assume she knows nothing about supermarket supply chains.
View attachment 1305064
This is so unfair on the other members as well. One of the reasons AA/NA meetings are held at inconspicuous places like churches or colleges is so that it's not obvious what sort of group people are attending if they're seen there by a neighbour. Making the time and place of your meetings identifiable to half a million strangers is disrespectful to everyone else there, and potentially dangerous because anyone in that group could be at risk from a stalker or abusive ex who now knows where to find them. Once again Jack gives absolutely no shits about anyone but herself.It would be really bleeping easy for someone to figure out where and when Jack's AA meetings are. For someone who allegedly had a stalker she sure gives out a lot of information about her whereabouts.
Yes of course parliament would have been oblivious to this fact until you mentioned it, you egotistical fool.
The £20 shop, work harder and save £30k and now this. Shes a Tory’s wet dreamFor a lot of people this is going to be all the ‘proof’ they need that poorer people aren’t struggling more than anyone else.
What a headline!!
“So you’re across all this. Can you give us some examples of the effect?”That interview is a disgrace. Why are the BBC allowing her to repeat such bullshit. And how does it sit for impartiality for her to say ASDA were good but sainsbury’s were belligerent.
also big sniff at 11.07 I see you Jack.
Not Del Monte prunes??
The cheek to repeat information that has been in the headlines for months as if it's new information is really somethingYes of course parliament would have been oblivious to this fact until you mentioned it, you egotistical fool.