The arrogance!
Jack Monroe #304 Very middle class
- Start date
-
- Tags
- Jack Monroe Threads Wiki
- Status
New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
Pete Wharmby? He sucks up to Jack quite a lot.
This squig does appear to be right, doesn't it?
Attachments
He was sacked from his firm for sending abusive tweets, then went before the Solicitors’ Disciplinary Tribunal where he narrowly avoided being struck off.
I looked this up a while back - hope the link works:
That DIVA article was just Jack cosplaying again. As a sober thoughtful University student. Studying for her nutrition degree. She was lying. She is a compulsive liar. This has been documented here over and over again. Lying on the scale she does is actually pitiful and sad, but dragging vulnerable people in to fund her deception is so very wrong.
You’re so right JB. At the time I think a few of us got sucked into the lie, especially because she made a few references that were clearly aimed at us and this site.
I‘ll admit I fell for it at the time, but looking back, and considering what you say, of course it was just more lies.
Hers’s the post with the full article screenshotted by lovel @EddieBeds in case anyone’s not seen it -
Jack Monroe #216 What a life. What a strange, glorious, unimaginable life.
Ah right thanks orphyb- how does one see the mag article? Download the readly app and do a free 2 month trial
tattle.life
Edited to add, I’m sure there was a post here which broke down man inconsistencies from that article.
Last edited:
And where did that money go? And she rattled on more than one occasion for that
Whilst I agree that it is a bit of a stretch to claim that someone saying you are rich damages your reputation for being poor: rather like the leper, in Life of Brian, complaining that Brian curing his leprosy has damaged his ability to beg.
Her whole claim is of doubtful merit, not least because her reputation is in large part built on fighting the 'white wingers'... something this case clearly does (and it might well be argued she provoked (to boost her reputation) with her "white, privileged, male" comments). Being offended by the offending comments from the offending parties also bolsters, rather than, diminishes her reputation (it's not hard to find people praising and defending her for her valiant works of selfless devotion - see Christopher Hitchen's documentary on Mother Theresa) (And, she's neither the first of the only person to make recipes for budget food, and none of them received the kind of adulation she does).
The problem is that the second test is damage to financial and/or commercial arrangements.
And it might be the case that she has some sort of financial or commercial arrangement with the food banks distributing her recipes (and indeed those not distributing her recipes), or for promoting their services, or for boosting their public profile, etc, (chuggers don't work for free) and these comments may make those organisations less likely to renew that arrangement - at which point she does have a claim for damages.
And this case gets interesting, especially in light of Mr Anderson's full comment, "I'm giving my time & my money to help the people in Ashfield. She's taking money off some of the most vulnerable in society"
Also the bit she doesn't understand is in the Katie Hopkins trial, she was the unknown underdog, and that by the time of that trial a lot of people were sick of Katie Hopkins, and her schtick. And in this case she is in the position of Katie Hopkins.
Last edited:
Why did she tweet her solicitor to help. Especially public thats so weird and the sub is so public. Eesh love.
What I want to know is where's judge Rinder? He's sort in it in a minute.
Last edited:
LORKS! What a night! I saw there was a tit ton of pages and was very glad I decided to read them all instead of whizzing past to catch up. What an absolute whopper she is, hopefully this will be the grifting idiot’s downfall now. She deserves everything that’s coming to her, the cocky twit thinks she’s infallible (
) and she ain’t. Feel massively unclean at being on the ‘side’ of Fox et al but needs must on this occasion, we’ve all put too much time and effort into her to worry about that now.
) and she ain’t. Feel massively unclean at being on the ‘side’ of Fox et al but needs must on this occasion, we’ve all put too much time and effort into her to worry about that now.
Oh my god
But would the outcome have been different if Katie turned up in court?
Shall we have a sweepstake on what time Jack will regain consciousness and begin her deleting spree today?
It’s very lucky for Mr F that I was awake nice and early to catch up on everything.
She's normally up about 11.30/12 ish.
Bloody hell though, all the deletions in the world aren't going to make this one go away quietly. She's really messed with the wrong people here.
Surely this has to be the chaos that finally gets the attention of Private Eye? And then if she tries to take them on for libel...HerSlop vs Hislop could be the trial of the century!
Going with the theme of foods beginning with P she would have to call it Pumble
She needs a fire hose
Wow. Busy day yesterday so missed the absolute chaos that was her starting legal proceedings against probably some of the least on the internet.
However, before I go back and
/
on all your posts, two things.
1. How happy must Louisa be right now?
2. Jack was definitely on some kind of (probably narc) high last night and will wake up with that sinking “what the F have I done” regret. I don’t wish that on anyone (whether it comes from crippling anxiety, substances or another reason because it feels awful and you just want to curl into a ball and make the world disappear). However, Jack brought this all on herself and she needs to face up to the consequences of her actions.
However, before I go back and
/ on all your posts, two things.1. How happy must Louisa be right now?
2. Jack was definitely on some kind of (probably narc) high last night and will wake up with that sinking “what the F have I done” regret. I don’t wish that on anyone (whether it comes from crippling anxiety, substances or another reason because it feels awful and you just want to curl into a ball and make the world disappear). However, Jack brought this all on herself and she needs to face up to the consequences of her actions.
- Status