I’m going to ask wanker squig to subscribe to my patreon where I shall be doing good things goodly . As he believes that people who say they are doing going things should be trusted , I shall expect him to trust me implicitly and not expect any of the promised content until I’m readyCan’t be arsed to squiggle but one response to someone talking about TT/how much patreon money she receives is -
“WTF do you think you’re entitled to anything?
Let Jack do what she does brilliantly and you wait until she’s ready. Trust her implicitly.
As an anonymous account I’m sure you think you’re doing good work. The reality is you’re just a pain in the arse.”
What the actual duck. Why would you trust someone you don’t know implicitly?! Just because a person is verified on twitter it doesn’t mean you should happily throw money at them. I agree no one is entitled to know the details of Jack’s personal finances (obviously the charity money is different and people who donated are entitled to know where it went) but when she tweets regularly about her financial info people are going to question it.
There really is no helping some people
![Slightly smiling face :slight_smile: 🙂](https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/gh/joypixels/emoji-assets@5.0/png/64/1f642.png)
you know when we were told “ don’t take sweets from strangers “ and “ don’t get in the van to pet the puppies“ as kids ? “ don’t trust strangers on the internet implicitly” is just the adult version of that
I would not get in a van with Jack even if she promised me the van was full of the cutest puppies EVER! And you know those puppies would be cute, because Jack actually can’t lie due to being autistic. She said it so it must be true