Perfectly put. This is the crux of everything she does.More and more with her tweets and I don't see poor ( once was poor) urchin. I see a person who has issues with the fact that she has to either work or grift in order to live the life she thinks she's owed.
Her voting card could be a shopping listShe could have stood as an Independent
It's all just more layers of the made-up narrative for her poverty grift. Her mate who came on here ages ago (forgot the name) confirmed the obvious - that she is and always has been just very, very lazy.Just like she didn’t apply for benefits because she didn’t want to “be on benefits” and “mummy works”
The squigs wouldn't even notice. Jack deactivated her account for two days and not one of them noticed. Not one.The really sad thing is she claims she is needed but if she did indeed close her twitter down tomorrow her squigs would move on.
Ah yes, she’s better than the burger munching, daytime tv viewing underclass, as she sees ‘the poor’. True colours shining through right there. Her adoring fans sure have short memories. Either that or they secretly harbour similar views that are the opposite of what they put on Twitter.Just like she didn’t apply for benefits because she didn’t want to “be on benefits” and “mummy works”
'..taking to her bed ennui-positive.'As Jack is snarling on Twitter at people questioning her motives can we assume that the promised index (that is so last week now) will not appear? Because she is struggling because of horrible nasty people who are questioning her motives for all the hard work she does to help The Poor. Because her puppy-brain is scampering at all the ideas she has to help The Poor. Jack will be taking to her bed ennui-positive until people start to get distressed at her absence on SM and send in the virtual police for a welfare check. (By then, she will have got her excuses ready for the things that didn't happen to help The Poor.
Oxygen-thief.
They just had one less thing to retweet and feel righteous about.The squigs wouldn't even notice. Jack deactivated her account for two days and not one of them noticed. Not one.
I always get confused, cause I thought Jack DID claim benefits? After leaving the fire service?Just like she didn’t apply for benefits because she didn’t want to “be on benefits” and “mummy works”
Great, more autism stereotypes.Roughly translated by Google:
'She left school at 16 but her Asperger syndrome makes her a numbers whiz. Jack Monroe, girl-boy, heroine of poor consumers, changed the indicator of British inflation.'
She did, and wrote about how the delays in payment and withholding of benefits when she started to get a press profile buggered her up.I always get confused, cause I thought Jack DID claim benefits? After leaving the fire service?
Does this mean when she was in The Poverty, she didn’t even claim the help that was available to her?
Her backstory is 98% lies built on a momentary (self inflicted) hardship so there are a few grains of truth. But in her own words in one of her earlier articles she refused to claim benefits because she’s not a tracksuit wearing scrounger or some such nasty stereotype so she told her then toddler age son that ‘mummy works’.I always get confused, cause I thought Jack DID claim benefits? After leaving the fire service?
You don't get paid out straight away if you MAKE YOURSELF UNEMPLOYED.I always get confused, cause I thought Jack DID claim benefits? After leaving the fire service?
Does this mean when she was in The Poverty, she didn’t even claim the help that was available to her?
4 March 2022I guess being told off as a child would be a bitter experience - oh to have heard it
And also they will be expecting this money more so than all those promised donations from the newspaper\tv slots. The newspaper and TV were earnings so her promise was just a lie whereas the merch was fully on the expectation TT will get this time
For her to be transparent she will need to show the full payment made, the costs to the tee company, and with the donations, the breakdown of the charities - anything less it's not transparent
Frank crossed with Uncle Albert, what a combo.I can just imagine her stood next to the bargain fridge droning on about herself to all and sundry.
She’s like Frank off Vicar of Dibley.
The mistake you're making here is to approach this in the entirely reasonable belief that there are a set of established facts. Jack's story has no beginning, middle or end. Schrodinger's floofs abound. Often external opportunities can change the narrative quite dramatically, one day she's the Mummy Works Martyr bringing up her son alone, then I, Daniel Blake comes out and a stint on benefits being mistreated by the DWP becomes a better story. One day SB's dad is the best and most supportive co-parent anyone could want, the next she's flogging lightbulbs and toys to survive.I always get confused, cause I thought Jack DID claim benefits? After leaving the fire service?
Does this mean when she was in The Poverty, she didn’t even claim the help that was available to her?
The funniest thing was, the mate knew her very well post-fame but said she was always feeding her!It's all just more layers of the made-up narrative for her poverty grift. Her mate who came on here ages ago (forgot the name) confirmed the obvious - that she is and always has been just very, very lazy.
The more I think about it and the more I read here, the more I wonder why bother. It will never make sense.The mistake you're making here is to approach this in the entirely reasonable belief that there are a set of established facts. Jack's story has no beginning, middle or end. Schrodinger's floofs abound. Often external opportunities can change the narrative quite dramatically, one day she's the Mummy Works Martyr bringing up her son alone, then I, Daniel Blake comes out and a stint on benefits being mistreated by the DWP becomes a better story. One day SB's dad is the best and most supportive co-parent anyone could want, the next she's flogging lightbulbs and toys to survive.
View attachment 1037314
The guff is still there. I suggested earlier that it had been removed, but I was looking on the wrong page. Soz.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?