Since when was Jack concerned with “absolute transparency”?
Jackonomics 101Two for me, one for poors, two for me, one for poors.
It’s so weird, obvs this is a privileged stance but it’s wrt people who’ve got £44 to spend on a virtue signalling hoodie they’ll likely never wear - I know it’s a v MC pursuit to reject stuff and feel smug about it so forgive me but as the world’s environmental consciousness is growing the idea of buying stuff you don’t love/need feels really odd? Like creating an entire physical product to generate £7 for charity is such an inefficient process and not even one ppl are all for anymore???Urgh, I just cant.....can't....whatever.
Seriously if you have 20/40 quid to spunk on a pointless item of clothing then just donate the full amount to Trussell Trust.
Cat Bin Lady, if you're reading this, redeem yourself by putting Jack in the bin.
God, if you can hear me. Start the bleeping rapture.
Is that 5% fat or 10% fat mince or all mince is the same thick?She is as thick as mince (Asda smart price £2.65 /650g)
They add more fat into some mince. #neverforgetIs that 5% fat or 10% fat mince or all mince is the same thick?
Was just about to post this. I don't understand what I'm looking at.There are no words for how up her own arse she is
Isn’t charity supposed to be silent and all that?There are no words for how up her own arse she is