Is she going to announce the reason for wanting C names or was she just wanting to people to talk at her.
we all know you can talk to her, unless it's solely about her.
we all know you can talk to her, unless it's solely about her.
The sheer pretentiousness. Goes well with the povvo aesthetic.
I hate to go on about it but Flowers in the Attic has heavy 1978 energy.Also has she ever read flowers in the attic by Virginia Andrews
Those books were creepyI hate to go on about it but Flowers in the Attic has heavy 1978 energy.
LJC I totally agree. I mean i could run around in my work place flashing my tits at people (I'm knocking on a bit but to be fair to them they are still perky). But im not still hot and it would be at a funeral so may not be appropriate unless asked for. What is all this "empowerment " bollocks, the end result is still "tits ooooot for the lads" (Viz)I don't get tit pics from women over a certain age who arent in the industry of tit pic. It's all very readers wives and a bit desperate. Like you need to try and prove that your still hot or something. I just find it odd, but apart from when I was a baby I've never been much of an exhibitionist.
I find that it's usually a case of this:Is she going to announce the reason for wanting C names or was she just wanting to people to talk at her.
Why is this labelled with her name in the most basic witch of all the labels?Can anyone tell me what this actually IS? I don't think I'm thick by any means but I just don't get it? And why is it of note?
She’s heteronormative round the edgesSorry, still catching up, did anyone else think this was a curious thing for someone who has identified as non binary to say? Surely all names are suitable for all genders... Not trying to police anyone's thoughts, just found it interesting in working out how Jack's brain ticks!
View attachment 868486