OMG this is like watching a thriller, the protagonist is all relaxed, and then we see the baddie open the door. She’s infiltrated a literal day of disabilities! What the actual fuck. Someone who “lost the use of her hands” but managed to cross stick the effing BBC studios location. Lord have mercy, Keyser Soze is in the building.So the company have mentioned her - assume this is what the shoot is for. I hope I'm wrong but subtlety isn't her strong point
View attachment 333564
Me too!So is she actually modelling underwear? Much confused.
why did she even say she was a pescotarian bodybuilder? she looks great in that photo, but does not look massively toned and there is nothing with that. why the fuck would attach that label to yourself?
Honestly @Lanie you can’t see anything about Jack in that photo, it doesn’t tell us anything about Jacks physical or mental health because it’s basically not Jack. She’s edited the photo beyond recognition. She’s going for this look, the doe eyed, misunderstood, ailing, pixie victim. She wants everyone to believe she’s unwell, she isn’t, because if she actually showed a photo of her true self she wouldn’t get the attention.SPOILER**"
This is so true. People keep saying she looks great but she is looks ill, very drawn and washed out despite the face tuning.
I don't see a successful happy woman, but an ill, very mentally unwell woman.
If she tags them and it was gifted, isn't she meant to show that? Not sure of the exact rules, I know it's been mentioned by Fraus who do know. That was why I wondered if it was linked. I do hope I'm wrong!I do believe that a lot of her stuff will be gifted and sent by companies. Some of the very low key crap amateur bloggers or instagrammers that I follow get sent tonnes of free stuff, not even related to what they post about, so if you have cookbooks and newspaper inches I bet you get shitloads.
again, would be funny if it wasn't conning anyone.View attachment 333585
These people are so naive.
oh my lord. she does look like cliff richard.More like Cliff to me
Right this makes sense. So we are back to there was zero point in taking an underwear selfie apart from wanting the attention. She’s now saying how much she loves them and the company have replied, so she will get some free stuff out of itMe too!Surely the photoshoot was not for the underwear, why would she be wearing two and have mentioned putting a shirt on if that was the case? Make it make sense!
Edited to add:
On further investigation, someone asked her where the vest* was from and she tagged the company, who then retweeted her pic, so I think they're just trying to get publicity from a blue ticker wearing their stuff rather than it being a photoshoot actually for them.
*There's probably a fancier name for it, but it looks like a vest to me!
I can only hope that the more “suggestive” squiggles don’t take it upon themselves to buzz cut their hair and expect it to grow back into a perfectly styled pixie cut.Does she honestly want us to believe she hasn't had a haircut, and that's how her hair has grown out from a buzz cut? You can literally see the layers.
Fuck me. I just can't with her.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?