Exactly what I thought the damage she could have done pulling that over onto her self poor little girl.So Halle broke her camera that was on a tripod Shan left in the same room as Halle. She should have been more worried about Halle grabbing the tripod and the camera smacking her in the head
So true! Couldn’t believe it. Give the child some privacy for goodness sake.Came here to say the same thing, what the hell?! What kind of sick parents shows their child in nothing but their underwear for the world to see, it’s not even like a was a single second either (not that that would make it any better). The hiding of their faces is absolutely nothing to do with wanting to protect them, it’s purely because Ash put his foot down and said he didn’t want them being shown. I guess he doesn’t watch the vlogs.
Tbf, I don't put my partners washing away but only because his wardrobe and drawers are a bomb site and I don't know where to start and I'm not about to tidy themSo true! Couldn’t believe it. Give the child some privacy for goodness sake.
Yet another ramble about not having an identity outside of being a mum she’s not at work but actively choosing not to go back to work and therefore only being mum! Make your mind up woman, you can’t have it all ways.
I was surprised too (and I’m also calling BS) when she said that G didn’t do Go Ape because you had to be 1m tall and he isn’t. He would be quite small for his age (and he doesn’t appear to be) if he was under 1m. My eldest is particularly tall at 105cm already and I’ve said before her and G are almost birthday twins but I really, really don’t believe he’s that much smaller. I suspect she didn’t want to pay for it or couldn’t be bothered for him to do it.
Maybe this is just me, but I also find it so weird that she never puts A’s washing away. I’m all for sharing the load with your other half but surely it’d take two more minutes to do his? I presume she’s washing it already and she hasn’t left the kids’ clothes for him to put away, she did it.
George must be over 1m tall, my little boy is about the same as George a few weeks older and he actually is under 1m and he is very small for his age (I’m 4ft11 and his dad is 5ft7) and he’s almost 1m, so George must be taller.So true! Couldn’t believe it. Give the child some privacy for goodness sake.
Yet another ramble about not having an identity outside of being a mum she’s not at work but actively choosing not to go back to work and therefore only being mum! Make your mind up woman, you can’t have it all ways.
I was surprised too (and I’m also calling BS) when she said that G didn’t do Go Ape because you had to be 1m tall and he isn’t. He would be quite small for his age (and he doesn’t appear to be) if he was under 1m. My eldest is particularly tall at 105cm already and I’ve said before her and G are almost birthday twins but I really, really don’t believe he’s that much smaller. I suspect she didn’t want to pay for it or couldn’t be bothered for him to do it.
Maybe this is just me, but I also find it so weird that she never puts A’s washing away. I’m all for sharing the load with your other half but surely it’d take two more minutes to do his? I presume she’s washing it already and she hasn’t left the kids’ clothes for him to put away, she did it.
Then problem is the help she thinks he needs isn't what he probably actually needs. He just needs a mother who actually gives him some attention and compassion, neither of which she does.How Shan describes George’s behaviour is really concerning, he sounds completely out of control. I really hope he gets the help he needs.
why should she put his washing away? genuine questionSo true! Couldn’t believe it. Give the child some privacy for goodness sake.
Yet another ramble about not having an identity outside of being a mum she’s not at work but actively choosing not to go back to work and therefore only being mum! Make your mind up woman, you can’t have it all ways.
I was surprised too (and I’m also calling BS) when she said that G didn’t do Go Ape because you had to be 1m tall and he isn’t. He would be quite small for his age (and he doesn’t appear to be) if he was under 1m. My eldest is particularly tall at 105cm already and I’ve said before her and G are almost birthday twins but I really, really don’t believe he’s that much smaller. I suspect she didn’t want to pay for it or couldn’t be bothered for him to do it.
Maybe this is just me, but I also find it so weird that she never puts A’s washing away. I’m all for sharing the load with your other half but surely it’d take two more minutes to do his? I presume she’s washing it already and she hasn’t left the kids’ clothes for him to put away, she did it.
I know she’s said quite a few times that they put their own clothes away. My husband puts washing away, I put washing away and if we do it, we both just do the whole basket to have it sorted. She shouldn’t have to, it’s just an unusual concept to me!why should she put his washing away? genuine question
I don't put my husbands awaywhy should she put his washing away? genuine question
My girl has just turnt 3 and she is 99cm but her cousin is 4 in October (similar to george) and he is smaller then my girl..so he could quite possible be smallerGeorge must be over 1m tall, my little boy is about the same as George a few weeks older and he actually is under 1m and he is very small for his age (I’m 4ft11 and his dad is 5ft7) and he’s almost 1m, so George must be taller.
Idk, she's put yet at the end! I reckon she's having another 6 months off then going back
I was thinking more along the lines of how she's going to actually cope being an "official" sahm.Idk, she's put yet at the end! I reckon she's having another 6 months off then going back
Doesn't the new funding start in September for 9+ month oldsI was thinking more along the lines of how she's going to actually cope being an "official" sahm.I think she'll potentially try drag it out until Halle is nearly 2 if she is eligible for the free hours 2 years can get?!
I'm curious if George would still get 30 free hours of childcare but I guess her income from her social media "content" would cover that?!
I think its if both parents are working? I know the 2 year funding is for working parents. Unless churning out a tit vlog once a week counts as workingDoesn't the new funding start in September for 9+ month olds
She'll be classed as "self employed" so no doubt will get the funded hours..I think its if both parents are working? I know the 2 year funding is for working parents. Unless churning out a tit vlog once a week counts as working