Harry & Meghan #58 From bump concealing to thunder stealing. Poor Eugenie how you feeling?

Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
In my suspcious mind I'm thinking Kim thinks she is doing Megs like a favour and that they can like catch up and commiserate together, do some like brainstorming, like in a like sisterhood and like become like best friends and she can like show her like the ropes on how to like spin bullshit into like gold. 🤮

Why does the media insist on calling them a "young couple"? She is knocking on the door of 40 and he is on the wrong side of 35, it's mind boggling. :rolleyes:
The ‘young couple’ and ‘young mother’ horseshit really boils my blood. Young? At nearly 40?!?

Also when Smegma refers to herself as a ‘young mum’. WTF?!

I had my daughter aged 33 and when I went to the various local mums n tots groups I felt like her grannie! All the other mums were 17-19, early 20s and there was me (only early 30s then, I have to say) feeling ancient. However, credit to the group I attended the most, no one treated me as an ‘old mum’ (cos I wasn’t!!!) and all the other young mums chatted to me the same as they did to their same age group.

It transpired to be a very, very lovely supportive, friendly group - lots of kind, chatty women and no bitching or judging others. It was so very refreshing. Although, I had to laugh when one young mum from the group asked me if I could go into the local shop to buy some tobacco for her. When I asked her why she couldn’t go in to buy it herself, she announced, “I got barred last week for punching the owner in the face.” Ahem. I went in and bought the tobacco quick smart in case she was going to punch me next!!!🤣🤣🤣
 
  • Haha
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 36
Just putting on my maths head for a mo. Don't know if anyone's discussed this yet but ... Poor lass miscarried at the end of July, and is now supposed to be at least five months expectant. So this once again is a fact that Meggomonia must have ignored medical advice to wait a while before trying again. She gave August the wait then in September caught on again. So this is likely to be a June baby, but knock me down with a feather, that photo of the bump looks bigger than five months.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 21
I love the headline on the Daily Fail today "HAVE THEY NO RESPECT?" They (and when I say they it is more likely her) just couldn't leave it alone, could they? I love that the palace insider said what they do is philanthropy, not public service.

So this is likely to be a June baby, but knock me down with a feather, that photo of the bump looks bigger than five months.
Yeah, I think that's where the speculation of twins comes from or maybe there wasn't a miscarriage. To quote the Thompson Twins "Lies, lies, lies yeah, they're gonna get you."
 
  • Like
Reactions: 27
Just putting on my maths head for a mo. Don't know if anyone's discussed this yet but ... Poor lass miscarried at the end of July, and is now supposed to be at least five months expectant. So this once again is a fact that Meggomonia must have ignored medical advice to wait a while before trying again. She gave August the wait then in September caught on again. So this is likely to be a June baby, but knock me down with a feather, that photo of the bump looks bigger than five months.
I thought in the photo she was pushing her bum from the ground to make her bump look bigger, it doesn't look quite right, but you can't see clearly because of the dress.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 16
From what I can figure out, Harry still wanted (hoped)
(spoiled, entitled much)
to keep some titles and patronages. Then the Oprah interview was leaked, Prince Philip entered the hospital and the Queen had to act quickly.
Wait and Philip might die :cry:
The Queen could not do it while she was in mourning.
Wait until after the interview, it might seem spiteful rather than well thought out.

According to Blind Gossip, Harry really did care about his military titles, Meghan only cared about the Duke and specifically the Duchess title. What Meghan wants, Meghan gets :sick:

I read Harry and the Queen were in talks and then the Oprah interview dropped. HM the Queen had to end this mess quickly for all reasons mentioned.

Short and simple, Harry wanted some titles kept. Thought his Grandmother would relent as they previously had a close relationship. THEN the Oprah interview = NO DEAL. (I think it was always going to end this way. The Queen puts duty first. Harry was delusional). (Harry was hoping for a Megxit in his favor, wanted it signed, sealed, delivered before the Oprah interview was mentioned; threw a new baby in the mix for sympathy). BUT, the Oprah interview was leaked early. bleep lost.

AND. I read in the Express, the Oprah interview is not the BIG one, that is being planned for Netflix, where Royal tea will be spilled.
Apparently there is more on the Oprah interview in the Sunday Times tomorrow....something about the timing of the interview but the journo wouldn't be drawn. )
I'll be off to the newsagents at the crack of dawn tomorrow :m
 
  • Like
  • Haha
  • Sick
Reactions: 26
What annoys me (of many things) is that they throw the York girls as an example of making their own income while still being in the family.

They have "proper" jobs, and are not working Royals. Their "job" is not promoting themselves and selling their speeches or anything else connected to their family to the highest bidder.

If they decided they wanted to work in a more mundane job, they would have a lot less flak.

What they are trying to do is commercialised royalling in the US, and that is why they are getting grief and what no one in their right mind likes or even thinks they will be successful at. They've no intention of getting their hands dirty for longer than a photo op, and just expect the money to roll in.
All this. The York girls have salaried 9-5 jobs their job isn’t selling “themselves” to Netflix/Spotify.
I’m not saying the girls didn’t get those jobs because of who they are, but they are hardly cashing in the RF to the highest bidder by any means.
If these 2 pair of what Freda says got salaried jobs with 28 days Holiday a year (plus a request for non paid leave to do their patronage’s) I’m sure this may have been salvageable - but they didn’t . They wanted to sell out the RF and TQ bossed it and bossed them.
They got what they wanted...only they didn’t. They wanted to use the RF to make Monet, pure and simple and she had Meegains number from the oft. Yesterday’s news was great, happy weekend everyone. X
 
  • Like
Reactions: 37
I have read before that Meghan was ‘hired’ to cause turmoil in the RF. The rumoured backers are people linked with Epstein and Weinstein. What I don’t understand is WHY the backers wanted to cause turmoil in the RF in the first place. To what aim? Has someone in the RF pissed them off, eg Andrew? If any of this is true, ‘revenge’ must be at the heart of it, but revenge for what? I can’t seem to find an answer to this question.

I can believe that MM might be being paying paid by ‘someone’ for the role she has played so far. People have hinted that she is getting money from elsewhere in order to afford all her expensive PR and litigation battles. Could this be the reason for the moon bump, invisible baby? To con the RF into believing they have a grandchild and then sit back and watch the fall out when it all comes to light?

Despite these rumours of darker forces being at work and pulling MM’s strings, MM has most certainly caused turmoil in the RF whether she is being ‘encouraged’ or not. She has been an outright disaster.

Sorry for all the rambling. I am thinking out loud. As more comes to light with the grifters, anything could be possible!


Hey! Please stop apologising. You have nothing to apologise for. You have to do what’s right by you and, if that means just skimming through these threads and not commenting, so be it. You know people love your pics but not at the expense of you feeling overwhelmed, poorly, or under any obligation. So now, if ever you do comment or make a funny pic in future, it will be even more special!

People were just asking after you out of concern as they had not seen you around. I knew the reason as you mentioned it on the Lauren Goodger thread but I didn’t say anything as it wasn’t my place. People are really glad you came back on to say you were ok and just needed a break. You are a very much loved poster 🙂.

PS I have not been on the Big Lozza thread for over 24 hours so I know I will have a lot to catch up on and loads of laughter as usual! 🤣. The Lozza threads are a bit of welcome, light relief from the H&M threads at the moment. As you know, the antics of H&M are really stirring up anger and upset at the moment (and with good reason after all the bombshells dropped this last week or so!).

Take Care x

ETA to my last post about dark forces being at work in the form of rich people, allegedly, paying Smeg to cause turmoil in the RF. Could it be Al Fayed? He has a motive, the money, and the contacts to carry out revenge - the death of his son and the woman he loved, Diana. Could it be the Al Fayed family who want to see chaos in the RF to get their own back?

Just another of my thoughts for that particular conspiracy theory. Probably been done to death by now but it popped into my head and I had to write it down before I forgot 🥴🙄
Thank you for your lovely post 🥰💖🤗😘❤ xx.

I'm no longer a missing person/corgi 🤭 xx.

Resizer_16138103341720.jpg


How old are you Mrs? I am 47, soon to be 48.
I'm 46 ..47 in late April 🙂😘 xx
 
  • Heart
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: 22
First big post here and need to get a few things off my chest (ie. rant....)

What I don’t really understand is the reason for not officially removing the HRH. The BRF /journos quote that lessons learned from Diana (and removing her HRH) would make the BRF look churlish and spiteful. But the reasons are completely different. Diana never wanted to go into ‘business’. Diana never wanted to use her title to make money, become a billionaire etc. MM and JCMH do. They want/need their HRH/Duke/Duchess etc to fill their bank accounts. That is plain and simple. Why are the BRF refusing to acknowledge that?

Secondly, there has definitely been a media blackout on them both and parts of their lives, probably at the request of the BRF. Will the press continue to uphold that agreement? Would the BRF want them too? I imagine the press know everything about MM’s past - why agree to continue to conceal it?
 
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 33
I thought in the photo she was pushing her bum from the ground to make her bump look bigger, it doesn't look quite right, but you can't see clearly because of the dress.
She’s been to the Lauren goodger school of “how to make your bump look bigger so you can make it rain £££$$$”
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: 17
Harry is a fool and will be left standing with no support, no friends, no money, no dignity ... nothing.

Remember the chat about Stretch Recipes on here back in thread #45? Nothing is a coincidence ... Meghan was hired to cause turmoil in the Royal Family and has succeeded. Everything is connected ... all the players are, well, 'playing' their parts.



I've read this before and I'm not convinced. Who are the murky controllers who are plotting against the royal family? The Russians, the Chinese? I want someone to explain exactly who these people are and why the duck should they really give a stuff about the royal family because I don't believe that the global elite are all in some plot together.🙄 however I do believe that Soho House is very shady......

Meghan hatched a little conspiracy with her mates from Soho House to trap Harry. They crafted her image so that she was presented as perfect for him not the used hooker she really was. Marcus set her up with Harry and Scabies the rent boy was set up as 'royal reporter' purely to be her mouthpiece. Soho House is a sleazy organisation that panders to the elite, roast chickens, boys, girls, drugs whatever you want I'm sure it's provided to their top clients.
At some point in the future they will be exposed like Epstein.
 
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 35
Princess Anne to succeed Prince Harry as Captain General Royal Marines
24hrs since the announcement and the replacement is already in place; "Business as usual, nothing to see here". Its the perfect way to show that nobody is irreplaceable and that like in any job, you actually have to show up in order to keep your salary, titles and perks. The Harkles think they're above all this :rolleyes:
 
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 41
First big post here and need to get a few things off my chest (ie. rant....)

What I don’t really understand is the reason for not officially removing the HRH. The BRF /journos quote that lessons learned from Diana (and removing her HRH) would make the BRF look churlish and spiteful. But the reasons are completely different. Diana never wanted to go into ‘business’. Diana never wanted to use her title to make money, become a billionaire etc. MM and JCMH do. They want/need their HRH/Duke/Duchess etc to fill their bank accounts. That is plain and simple. Why are the BRF refusing to acknowledge that?

Secondly, there has definitely been a media blackout on them both and parts of their lives, probably at the request of the BRF. Will the press continue to uphold that agreement? Would the BRF want them too? I imagine the press know everything about MM’s past - why agree to continue to conceal it?
I know what you mean. Is this time for the RF to say....go for it! Why conceal any of Smeggy’s lies anymore? The press seem to slowly be letting rip since this Oprah thing was released. Beggy and Smeggy have not just pissed one newspaper off, they have fucked off the whole UK press. Never before have all political parties and rival papers been in solidarity. They have insulted them all collectively and called all the U.K. residents racist. There will be a media fight back now. All media sources are in agreement and the public too. Soz Smeggy and Hazzno...you’ve tit all over your chips now. We‘ll now enjoy our fish and chips with salt and vinegar.
 
  • Like
  • Haha
  • Heart
Reactions: 27
First big post here and need to get a few things off my chest (ie. rant....)

What I don’t really understand is the reason for not officially removing the HRH. The BRF /journos quote that lessons learned from Diana (and removing her HRH) would make the BRF look churlish and spiteful. But the reasons are completely different. Diana never wanted to go into ‘business’. Diana never wanted to use her title to make money, become a billionaire etc. MM and JCMH do. They want/need their HRH/Duke/Duchess etc to fill their bank accounts. That is plain and simple. Why are the BRF refusing to acknowledge that?

Secondly, there has definitely been a media blackout on them both and parts of their lives, probably at the request of the BRF. Will the press continue to uphold that agreement? Would the BRF want them too? I imagine the press know everything about MM’s past - why agree to continue to conceal it?
I am sure for the titles to be removed this would have to go through parliament?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 10
I think what grinds the gears of most sane people, of which I count myself as one, is the hypocrisy of it all. I really believe most fair-minded people regard Rachel and Harry as a couple desperate for attention and a greed for money. That's fine. But when they flaunt around in private jets and then lecture us proles about saving the planet. That's what winds us up.

Then there is the privacy elephant in the room. Pretty pathetic. Why on earth would anyone with an interest in privacy move to Hollywood? That's just taking the p1ss isn't it. They are making mugs out of us.

Personally I think Rachel is a psychopath. On the spectrum with Trump. Totally insane. As for Harry, I think he's just a 12 year boy trapped inside of a man. Meghan is mothering him, playing him. What do you think? Love to know your views. I genuinely do think Meghan has mental health issues. Am I wrong? Should we be criticizing her? Or helping her? I am conflicted.
 
  • Like
  • Sick
Reactions: 33
I am sure for the titles to be removed this would have to go through parliament?
Yes it would have to be through Parliament.

Hopefully they’ll do something so awful that’ll have to happen!
 
  • Like
Reactions: 14
Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.