Thank youPom itโs good to see you here!
![Grinning face with big eyes :smiley: ๐](https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/gh/joypixels/emoji-assets@5.0/png/64/1f603.png)
![Hugging face :hugging: ๐ค](https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/gh/joypixels/emoji-assets@5.0/png/64/1f917.png)
![Face blowing a kiss :kissing_heart: ๐](https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/gh/joypixels/emoji-assets@5.0/png/64/1f618.png)
![Smiling face with 3 hearts :smiling_face_with_3_hearts: ๐ฅฐ](https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/gh/joypixels/emoji-assets@5.0/png/64/1f970.png)
I realise I can pop in and read abit daily but not like before it was going into hours so even though I might miss alot I will keep up to date
![Hugging face :hugging: ๐ค](https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/gh/joypixels/emoji-assets@5.0/png/64/1f917.png)
![Face blowing a kiss :kissing_heart: ๐](https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/gh/joypixels/emoji-assets@5.0/png/64/1f618.png)
Thank youPom itโs good to see you here!
This thread is a minefield without a doubt, I canโt keep up with it. Mainly because it annoys me too much! We all pretty much share the same views though so itโs easy enough to pop back inThank youxx.
I realise I can pop in and read abit daily but not like before it was going into hours so even though I might miss alot I will keep up to datexx
Very trueThis thread is a minefield without a doubt, I canโt keep up with it. Mainly because it annoys me too much! We all pretty much share the same views though so itโs easy enough to pop back in
I agreeI agree... Let's kind of keep it spitting image style piss take humour ( for us middle aged golden ones!!!) ...can you imagine this wks Friday episode if the original Fluck and Law spitting image series was on now!!!![]()
LooooooolOmg reagan!!!... J.Major and edwina!!!... Can u imagine grumpy politically incorrect phillip... Mรฉeeeeeghan ...harry noballs!!! Oh my imagination!!I need to stop!!!!!!!
It needs to be back with you in the puppet design team!!!!!
Itโs not that creepy she looks lovely
I have read before that Meghan was โhiredโ to cause turmoil in the RF. The rumoured backers are people linked with Epstein and Weinstein. What I donโt understand is WHY the backers wanted to cause turmoil in the RF in the first place. To what aim? Has someone in the RF pissed them off, eg Andrew? If any of this is true, โrevengeโ must be at the heart of it, but revenge for what? I canโt seem to find an answer to this question.Harry is a fool and will be left standing with no support, no friends, no money, no dignity ... nothing.
Remember the chat about Stretch Recipes on here back in thread #45? Nothing is a coincidence ... Meghan was hired to cause turmoil in the Royal Family and has succeeded. Everything is connected ... all the players are, well, 'playing' their parts.
![]()
Hey! Please stop apologising. You have nothing to apologise for. You have to do whatโs right by you and, if that means just skimming through these threads and not commenting, so be it. You know people love your pics but not at the expense of you feeling overwhelmed, poorly, or under any obligation. So now, if ever you do comment or make a funny pic in future, it will be even more special!Thank youxx.
I'm popping backI am getting withdrawal symptoms
xx
I admit I can't keep up with every post so I be flicking though and putting a reaction to the ones I like.
I think the court thing last week drove me mad I hate how her dad and the queen etc aren't been treated well by them.
I read every post before but it's a struggle, I'm not the fastest reader in the world lol.
I will still come on and will add a pic once in a while too but sadly can't read every post.
I won't leave completelyxx
I realise now it's exactly a year since I've joined
It's my favourite websitexx
Im confused though. If Harry pretty much knew TQ was gojng to wipe them of their titles, why was he so urgent in getting the answer early?Holy tit!Utter sly bastards.
All that crap from scoobie about how "it wasn't harry who wanted the review next month, it's all the palace's doing hahahaand hazza wasn't interested because he'd made his decision last year and was staying put no matter what the palace decided" bollox and him sneering at talk of hazzno fighting for his pretty uniforms etc. And all the while this was happening ---->>>>
The Mail has been told that it was Harry who pushed to restart talks over his and Meghanโs position early this year.
According to insiders, there was a โpuzzling sense of urgencyโ to his requests that perplexed palace officials. When news of Meghanโs deal for a โtell allโ interview with Oprah Winfrey broke earlier this week โall became clearโ.
Oh scoobie you two faced dirty little lying scumbag. All the time you were bare faced lying to cover their asses hazzno was crying to gangan and pleading his case, stomping his little trotters and trying to grind her down even while she was fretting about her husband potentially needing hospitalised.
You utter vindictive collection of cunts.
No wonder they want to gag the press. Had Chris Ship not uncovered the oprah scheme we'd still be up to our eyes in vomit inducing baby-bump congrats shite and be none the wiser of what the cunts were up to behind the carefully constructed facade of rainbows and unicorns and farting fairy dust in the Cali sunshine.
From what I can figure out, Harry still wanted (hoped)Im confused though. If Harry pretty much knew TQ was gojng to wipe them of their titles, why was he so urgent in getting the answer early?
I suspect TQ has been framed into their racist narrative so they could cry during thw oprah interview
Bravo!A bit of light relief - Anyone else see the resemblance?
if I remember correctly Worzel was pretty thick and Aunt Sally had ideas above her station and bossed him around.....a pretty good match on looks and character I think!
In my suspcious mind I'm thinking Kim thinks she is doing Megs like a favour and that they can like catch up and commiserate together, do some like brainstorming, like in a like sisterhood and like become like best friends and she can like show her like the ropes on how to like spin bullshit into like gold.I never thought that I'd love a Kardashian as much as I do right now! Thanks Kim
How old are you Mrs? I am 47, soon to be 48.I agreexx
That be funny lolxx.
I remember the first spitting image...I even had the drinking mugs back in the early 90s..I think to do with the 92 election.
They had cartoon Kinnock and John Major on them lolxx
Drinking tea I mean not alcoholxx
Hellsbells I looked on eBay selling them and they class it as "vintage pottery"damn I feel old
xx
HM has not changed her stance though that they can have their cake and eat it, also she's seen how badly the public have reacted to the last 11 months towards the Harkles antics.From what I can figure out, Harry still wanted (hoped)
(spoiled, entitled much)
to keep some titles and patronages. Then the Oprah interview was leaked, Prince Philip entered the hospital and the Queen had to act quickly.
Wait and Philip might die
The Queen could not do it while she was in mourning.
Wait until after the interview, it might seem spiteful rather than well thought out.
According to Blind Gossip, Harry really did care about his military titles, Meghan only cared about the Duke and specifically the Duchess title. What Meghan wants, Meghan gets
I read Harry and the Queen were in talks and then the Oprah interview dropped. HM the Queen had to end this mess quickly for all reasons mentioned.
Short and simple, Harry wanted some titles kept. Thought his Grandmother would relent as they previously had a close relationship. THEN the Oprah interview = NO DEAL. (I think it was always going to end this way. The Queen puts duty first. Harry was delusional). (Harry was hoping for a Megxit in his favor, wanted it signed, sealed, delivered before the Oprah interview was mentioned; threw a new baby in the mix for sympathy). BUT, the Oprah interview was leaked early. bleep lost.
AND. I read in the Express, the Oprah interview is not the BIG one, that is being planned for Netflix, where Royal tea will be spilled.
Is there a subliminal message in the top left 'Beaver Mayhem' teaser?I especially love that The Star is one of the few newspapers the Sussexes DIDN'T include in their 'zero engagement' policy.![]()