As much as I love HMQ & Charles is ok! I can’t wait until William and Catherine are crowned! No amount of zoom calls, podcasts or crap tv shows by the Markles will overshadow that. It will be the biggest tv event in a long time and H&M will be even more irrelevant than they already are
- Status
New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
Oh it’s too juicy.The Express say there may be a new "self help" book on the way... Must be a mahoosive typo - surely she would write a Help Self book
Royal Family LIVE: Meghan and Harry privately congratulate Eugenie
MEGHAN MARKLE and Prince Harry have congratulated Princess Eugenie and Jack Brooksbank on the birth of their baby boy.www.express.co.uk
‘How To Lose Friends and Ostracise People’
*goes off to nerdily Google famous self help titles*
THE Express has Royal commentator Hugo Vickers claiming H&M are "difficult" to promote after stepping down as royals
"When Harry was a member of the Royal Family, on the balcony, in a fantastic uniform or going down the Mall in a carriage for Trooping the Colour - that you can market.
"But look at him now, he's a guy in an open shirt or he's a guy coming off a plane with a backpack and a woolly beard and marketing that, it's not going to work."
In the same article Royal expert Russell Myers has claimed the Duke and Duchess of Sussex "crossed a line" by including Archie in their first podcast.
Speaking on True Royalty TV, Mr Myers said: "It's entirely their decision how they choose to bring up their child or children.
They moved for the reasons they've given - to give them some privacy.
"But if you are entering a commercial world and in your first venture, you use your child or place your child in that arena that's all people are going to be talking about.
"That's all we've been talking about and then you've crossed a line."
Royal commentator Duncan Larcombe added: "Because there is money involved, it isn’t a charitable thing.
"What a surprise that more family silver is out for sale – let’s use Archie as clickbait.
"Maybe Harry is going to be the 'Billion heir royal'
www.express.co.uk
"When Harry was a member of the Royal Family, on the balcony, in a fantastic uniform or going down the Mall in a carriage for Trooping the Colour - that you can market.
"But look at him now, he's a guy in an open shirt or he's a guy coming off a plane with a backpack and a woolly beard and marketing that, it's not going to work."
In the same article Royal expert Russell Myers has claimed the Duke and Duchess of Sussex "crossed a line" by including Archie in their first podcast.
Speaking on True Royalty TV, Mr Myers said: "It's entirely their decision how they choose to bring up their child or children.
They moved for the reasons they've given - to give them some privacy.
"But if you are entering a commercial world and in your first venture, you use your child or place your child in that arena that's all people are going to be talking about.
"That's all we've been talking about and then you've crossed a line."
Royal commentator Duncan Larcombe added: "Because there is money involved, it isn’t a charitable thing.
"What a surprise that more family silver is out for sale – let’s use Archie as clickbait.
"Maybe Harry is going to be the 'Billion heir royal'
Meghan Markle and Prince Harry 'difficult' to promote
MEGHAN MARKLE and Prince Harry have been warned promoting themselves will be "difficult" after breaking away from the Royal Family.
Talking of podcasts, it is now almost six weeks since their last ‘offering’.
Do you think there will be any more or have Spotify binned them off for being shite?
The more I think of that fake ’child’ giggling at the end of their last ‘offering’, the more I cringe. How utterly desperate was that move? What will they do with the ‘child’ next...Happy...giggle...Easter...giggle giggle.... YAWN!
Do you think there will be any more or have Spotify binned them off for being shite?
The more I think of that fake ’child’ giggling at the end of their last ‘offering’, the more I cringe. How utterly desperate was that move? What will they do with the ‘child’ next...Happy...giggle...Easter...giggle giggle.... YAWN!
The line of succession is protected by legislation,
I think the answer's yes to more Spotify podcasts at some point and for the same reasons as before:
- In last week's Spotify quarterly update, the CEO Daniel Ek mentioned them by name, said he was looking forward to more in 2021 (in a vague sort of way) and included a clip of the CringeCast in the Spotify 'sizzle reel'
of hot releases.- So there's more coming - but no timetable. Quarterly updates are normally strong on data for the analysts, so I'd have expected at a minimum an indication on timing. He didn't even commit to a season. That's not good. So there's 'more' but not 'à 10 part series launching in Q1'....
Also, these are being made by Spotify's Gimlet production team, so most of the work is being done by professionals. The Harkles and child genius 'Archie' just have to read a script...
'İ'm OK - You're OK - Are You OK'
Shocking sneak clip from the remote hearing in Megz v ANL*
*not really. And the Judge in this hearing allowed this clip to be shared
*not really. And the Judge in this hearing allowed this clip to be shared
She looks like an old bird gurning on a bit of lettuce.i know why smeggy did the tongue thing in her latest zoom picture. she is trying to look young and natural....
There’s a secret way your TONGUE can make you look better in photos
USING your TONGUE could make you look more “photogenic”. Posing for a photo can sometimes prove awkward – you smile, say cheese and wait for whoever’s snapping the shot to say it’s OK to move again…www.thesun.co.uk
Not surprising that the locals couldn't be bothered, they were probably too busy surviving (not thriving) and avoiding being beaten and robbed. But people, are you OK? Nobody's asked me me me if I'm OK ...
nah it still says maiden name Markle a couple of boxes below, unless Lady C has missed that that box changed too.
But we've only seen this portion of the second certificate...
I keep wondering why no-one has shown the complete second certificate, and whether any of the other details changed (like place of birth, time of birth, maiden name...)
i completely agree, it’s annoying. I’m just assuming that someone would defo have found out and mentioned it by now if the word Markle had been erased as well.But we've only seen this portion of the second certificate...
I keep wondering why no-one has shown the complete second certificate, and whether any of the other details changed (like place of birth, time of birth, maiden name...)
I am sure I have seen the full amended certificate somewhere and the name MARKLE is indeed left in the surname box. Wonder why?
Brilliant that made me laugh! I've not got any "people" either
But they don't know that!I am now Hamster!
the more we learn about Smeggy, the LESS we know!!
I don't understand why getting rid of her first names would change anything, legally. This is an official document.
They have said that Megz is the mother of a child born at the Portland on a specific date. She is the only Duchess of Sussex ( to have ever been)
Unless JCMH secretly divorced Smug and sneakily married the surrogate! ( in which case the surrogate would be the new Duchess of Sussex) I can't see how removing her first names would make one jot of difference. It's not like she is Mrs Smith, is it?
There has been a Duke of Sussex before though, interestingly . He was married twice - but neither marriage was "accepted as being suitable" by the RF and they weren't recognised....and his children were deemed illegitimate.
The Dukedom "died" in 1843 as it never had a legitimate heir. Strange, huh? I don't believe Brenda does anything by accident, though.
They have said that Megz is the mother of a child born at the Portland on a specific date. She is the only Duchess of Sussex ( to have ever been)
Unless JCMH secretly divorced Smug and sneakily married the surrogate! ( in which case the surrogate would be the new Duchess of Sussex) I can't see how removing her first names would make one jot of difference. It's not like she is Mrs Smith, is it?
There has been a Duke of Sussex before though, interestingly . He was married twice - but neither marriage was "accepted as being suitable" by the RF and they weren't recognised....and his children were deemed illegitimate.
The Dukedom "died" in 1843 as it never had a legitimate heir. Strange, huh? I don't believe Brenda does anything by accident, though.
I was thinking more along the lines of responding to it in the form of categorically denying all knowledge of it in the event of someone accusing them or staff of colluding with Hazzno and Megzy to hide a surrogacy.
For Pete's sake will someone in the know about the birth just throw her under the bus now. Obviously not whilst Friar Tuck is on it, lol. But why oh why are these two being so protected. Surely lying on an official public document trumps any other concerns?
Who knew it was everything but the nose that had changed, inc her colour ?!
- Status