Thats his problem; he's never had to function as a normal human being in a normal world. It might have come as a genuine shock to him that not everybody thinks he's the bee's knees. Being partnered up with a narcissist who is allergic to all and any criticism is just the perfect storm.
It’s clear he is talking about wanting censorship under the guise of wanting SM to be ‘kind’ and ‘nice’, but really it’s because their public image is a total disaster (for which they continue to stoke the fire with their obnoxious and loaded zoom calls and puff pieces) and they are concerned unpopular opinion expressed online will effect their pulling power. I would argue it is helping to keep them relevant.
Effectively, they want to ban free speech...
This is also my concern. Many people were celebrating when Trump was kicked off Twitter but any form of censorship can be dangerous.
. That must be gutting for Murky Meg and its obviously been done in a really nasty way by the sugar.Ah, I see, you want an emoji!
It's not OK. Censorship, cancel culture, no-platforming, I find it all very scary. I want to read what I want to read and I will make my own mind up about things. I read Trump's tweets and think he's a twit. I would much rather read his tweets and come to that decision myself, rather than not be given the opportunity at all. I don't need free-speech guardians to tell me what the 'correct' things to believe are. But that is the way things are going. What's that saying...'who will guard the gatekeepers'. The list of things we 'normal' people can talk about without risk of censure gets smaller by the day. We cannot publicly raise our objections to various social issues without be labelled as thick/racist/transphobic/xenophobic/sexist. And they wonder why polls are so unreliable these days...it's because people don't feel they have the freedom to say what they want anymore, or are too scared of the possible fallout of what they might say. A few years ago I used to enjoy a good friendly debate on FB, but debates don't exist anymore. Nowadays it's just not worth the hassle of falling out with people so I keep my mouth shut and sit there with my popcorn for the ones still willing to take the bait.This is also my concern. Many people were celebrating when Trump was kicked off Twitter but any form of censorship can be dangerous.
It's all very well if your thinking is in line with the censorship but what if you don't agree. The Spiked article I posted earlier in the thread outlines the problems with censorship well.
Murky Meg has been kicked off Instagram and a member of the Sussex squad had taken her ID and put up a sugary shrine to Meghan
Why is that OK?
Exactly; it is for us to draw our own conclusions not to be simply dictated to. However, I believe the way education is going children are not encouraged to research things themselves but simply cut-and-paste info from the web. I used to spend 2 hours at the library every Saturday from the age of 7 reading books and looking at stuff for homework.
These people are incredulous. That new fan page in Murky’s name bleats on and has a link for ‘Stop hate for profit’ but these windowlickers ignore the fact H&M pay lip service to woke causes in order to promote themselves... for profit. Their foundation (which if you remember that Russian hoax call last year with Hazza, they were being ‘guided’ towards doing, so y’know, NOT their long term passion project) they will profiteer from. To me that is hateful!This is also my concern. Many people were celebrating when Trump was kicked off Twitter but any form of censorship can be dangerous.
It's all very well if your thinking is in line with the censorship but what if you don't agree. The Spiked article I posted earlier in the thread outlines the problems with censorship well.
Murky Meg has been kicked off Instagram and a member of the Sussex squad had taken her ID and put up a sugary shrine to Meghan
Why is that OK?
This is also my concern. Many people were celebrating when Trump was kicked off Twitter but any form of censorship can be dangerous.
It's all very well if your thinking is in line with the censorship but what if you don't agree. The Spiked article I posted earlier in the thread outlines the problems with censorship well.
Murky Meg has been kicked off Instagram and a member of the Sussex squad had taken her ID and put up a sugary shrine to Meghan
Why is that OK?
Yes! And the emergence and overuse of Twitteraté buzzwords like ‘Karen’ ‘OK Boomer’ ‘White Privileged Male’ ‘Snowflake’ ‘Melt’ are all a means to shut conversation down. They all use them - like sheep.
I totally agree with you
Dear lord that's sad about your uncle being sucked in by the people who all think that we are being microchipped! Personally I couldn't care less as I don't believe Bill Gates et al have the time to be bothered about the likes of me wittering on about the Harkles
That’s the nail on the head. These two people are members of the British Royal Family!!! Rich, influential, privileged, and here they are -wannabe celebrity elite, money grubbing at every turn and using their PR propaganda (which is poisonous) to rally the troops and besmirch a whole nation and the positive work his family have done to help, promote and unite Commonwealth counties. It SHOULD be a scandal, but the media, especially TV media are not reporting that narrative. They’ve gone with the victim narrative, used by H&M to absolve themselves from their duty, which SHE vowed to do in return for titles. Still using those titles - liberally. Another thing the Sugars conveniently fail to acknowledge or question.I totally agree with you
I also stay away from debate on Facebook these days as it's not worth the hassle. Facebook is a complete yawn fest 🥱
The Harkles are in dangerous territory if they think its OK for an unelected elite to police us all like the 'Thought Police'.
Harry simply hasn't realised that by stepping away from the royal family his opinions are irrelevant and he is not a qualified expert on any of the areas in which he likes to pontificate.
www.newsweek.com
He might be but she never made the grade as she didn't do the time. She is absolutely nothing - just another actor who was never gonna get a major role in Hollywood and had to settle for Canadian mediocrity which cancelled her in the end. She is just Meghan Markle, Duchess of nowhere that wants to associate themselves with her - I live in Sussex btw - and never will be a Pwincess. A sad old bag.
C’mon- that’s a bit tight. She did get a word changed in a TV commercial when she was JUST 11 years old!!
Oh My GAWD this really grinds my gears. What a petty little tit. I cannot believe the judge allowed this. Really I can't. On and on and on and on with the victim narrative. and the bullshit about "my wife and I spent the whole of 2020"... yeah - your wife used your title to open the doors of all the bigwigs in silicon valley and Pacific Heights, and she went shopping for husband number 5. AFter she drops Harry, perhaps she will go for Larry (Ellison). He is "available" and she would be Wifey 5. and his daughter is called Megan.... what's not to like!Hazza using his wealth to get a legal statement read out in court even though a settlement was agreed at the end of last year (a narrow clarification of facts aka apology from the Mail and a donation to Invictus)
So more pointless legal costs and clogging up of the courts so that Hazza can grab some publicity. Can't he just get a hobby instead? Isn't Feb 1 when Sam Markle's book is published.....
Prince Harry's Lawyers to Make Court Statement on Royal Marines Libel Claim
Prince Harry's lawyers have been given a date for a court statement on allegations he turned his back on the Royal Marines, which he said left veterans "more susceptible to suicide."
A court filing reads: "A hearing is to be fixed before [Judge Matthew Nicklin] in the week commencing February 1, 2021, with a time estimate of up to two hours."
It adds that the newspaper's lawyers have not said whether they object to draft wording of the statement but that the two sides are expected to work together to resolve any issues.
It reads: "The above directions will either lead to an agreed [statement in open court] being read at the hearing that is to be fixed or any remaining dispute as to its terms being resolved."
Oh yeah - sorry - I love her reallyC’mon- that’s a bit tight. She did get a word changed in a TV commercial when she was JUST 11 years old!!
Ah but that would be when the monarchy would cease to exist. No-one would want him or his ****** wife having those roles.
As is this... is this really Netflix’s stance or a rogue employee - akin to the employee at Equity who called to get Laurence Fox blacklisted and was then shown the door for speaking out of turn.
