Sadly I think you may be rightI still think Harry is going to win.
Sadly I think you may be rightI still think Harry is going to win.
It’s a civil case so there wouldn’t be any criminal convictions. The civil case will be for compen$ation.I'm totally against phone hacking of any sort to anybody, rich or poor.
But if the people in MGM are innocent, and so far, H has offered no evidence, I wonder how they feel to be accused of it and possibly facing a jail term. Does H think of that. The privileged prick
Someone else had mentioned that on twitter but they said it was Elton John- I think this barrister used harry to make himself look good. I mean imagine representing the first royal on the stand in 130 years.Tom Bower on gb news. Says H was just a vehicle for Hugh Grant etc al as a high profile figure to boost their case
I don't! Think he's in for a shock.Sadly I think you may be right
and not bothering to show up on the first day!I don't! Think he's in for a shock.
Or we are if he does win, after providing no evidence
If he wins this with zero evidence doesn’t that set a precedent for more claims for people to come forward because “the story was suspicious I must have been hacked” with no evidence? If he wins this my faith in the justice system is gone.I don't! Think he's in for a shock.
Or we are if he does win, after providing no evidence
Isn't it the case that on one of the cases (could have been against NOTW - can't remember exactly as Hazno has so many) that he sued at the same time as William but while William settled Hazno refused toIn 2020 William received a previously-undisclosed (£1M?) from The Sun and News Of The World to settle his phone-hacking case. So he must have had evidence that his phone had been hacked, and sued successfully.
Quite apart from his jealousy at William receiving a large sum and it being kept a secret from him, surely it's likely that Harold's phone was hacked too? We don't know the years that William was hacked, but hacked he was. So why not Harold? Lack of evidence years later doesn't mean it didn't happen, and the evidence could have been removed. Yet Harold's team have launched a case with no seeming hard evidence, unlike William who must have had evidence?
Harold's waffling and forgetfulness from drugs and alcohol is making this look like a circus with no base for legal action, but this could be misleading and it's led us down a rabbit-hole of Harold never having a case at all when he has?
Even if to a far lesser extent, a few times compared to William's 100+?
They held their hands up for the ones that they were admitting to being guilty of and agreed out of court settlements but it doesn’t mean they’re guilty of the others. They may well be guilty, but the ginger one hasn’t helped his case by being unable to give ANY proof other than he suspected or believed it was happening. Not good enough for a court.Because the Mirror have admitted phone hacking in other cases.
And then he’ll finally be at peace with the world.Sadly I think you may be right
Sorry to be leaping ahead, catching up after a long day!He has just admitted that he gave the injury quotes.
Duke agrees he gave injury quotes
Mr Green points out that the article quotes Harry talking about his injury and his disappointment that he couldn’t march.
“This gave detailed information about the condition of your knee, didn’t it…and it also included quotes from you, didn’t it?” Mr Green asks.
Prince Harry agrees to both points.
“That’s in reference to while I was at Sandhurst and the distrust I ended up having with the medical staff as a result of this,” Harry adds.
I agree. I’ve heard nothing to indicate proof. If a 50% probability means he is allowed to consider his ‘hurt feelings’ and ‘hard suspiciousness’ then maybe but if that happens then the law courts are not fit for purpose!I don't! Think he's in for a shock.
Or we are if he does win, after providing no evidence
You can also see a square piece of tape sticking the wire to his sideburnYou can clearly see the wire
So if they've admitted hacking in other cases, why wouldn't they have just admitted hacking him at the same time, if they'd hacked him?Because the Mirror have admitted phone hacking in other cases.
If he was wearing a wire it must have run out of charge cos it didn’t look like it did him much goodYou can also see a square piece of tape sticking the wire to his sideburn
They do say that you can't cheat an honest man . . .Some people are feeling that way. As if other people are egging him on to do this.
I saw a tweet about it, let me look for it really quickly.
Not to mention that it really doesn’t take an enormous leap to imagine the girlfriend of a high profile prince might be pretty pissed off that he’d been caught going to a strip club.And that angry conversations held over the phone can be easily overhead by people in the other room, staff working nearby - none of whom may like you and might also be happy to make a call for £££