Harry & Meghan #357 what do you mean I need proof, when you said that I thought it was just a spoof, WAAAGH!
“I don’t believe it, so it didn’t happen, unlike the stuff only I believe”.
great minds - just posted similar!“It’s a palindrome”
”The palindrome of Bolton is Notlob”
John Cleese did study Law.
Thread title #357Hard evidence of suspiciousness![]()
Waiting for him to say William shat in my bedI think he wanted his own Johnny Depp moment.
Unfortunately, it hasn't worked out that way.
IMO he'll probably win, but it'll be a Pyrrhic victory, like Smeg's with ANL. He may win on a technicality, but he's made an utter fool of himself in the process.But the really Sad thing is................... The Judge is liable to find in his favour!!!!! (Surely Not!)
Oh I say, ding dong, hello ...
What sort of bat tit crazy is this. It sounds like something the Monty Python gang would put together.
The joint plaintiffs in this case must be regretting hitching their wagon to H. The stupid donkey has been into the huch andand gone crazy.
I keep thinking I am going to wake up from some twilight zone nightmare.
live streaming from Sicknote's trial:This is becoming like a Monty Python sketch, we just need a dead parrot!![]()
Too big to be from a Corgi ...Waiting for him to say William shat in my bed![]()
4767474755335553653Thats really funny![]()
Hard evidence he's thick as eff. Oh dear look who's been Markled by AssociationThread title #357![]()
They would have to bring evidence attesting to the trail of information and the illegal means it was obtained by. They don't have many avenues via which they can prove this, one would be correspondence (email, text messages, voicemails - lol) where the illegal means are being alluded to or mentioned in connection to the articles written at the time about Harry. Witnesses would be another way, such as ex employees, whistleblowers who have personal knowledge of the dealings inside the publications at the time of the articles etc.After Mr Green has dealt with the 33 matters, demonstrating that the information could have been obtained by reading other papers or press releases or talking to people, what the hell is Mr Sherbourne going to do? Try to convince the judge that facts aren’t important, and that the important bit is that Prince twit had a hurty feelings boo-boo, that no amount of drink, drugs or todger cream could take away?
Is like American courts where the defendant's attorney gets to ask more questions after the plantiff's attorney?I was waiting for his side to pull out some gotcha moment.
FFS who thought this tit was evidence.
I bet she hangs him out to dry for this in the press again, like when she put out that statement when Spare came out, claiming that she personally wouldn’t have chosen to approach things the way he did, lol. I’m just waiting for her press release claiming she’d “cautioned Harry against suing,” or some nonsense.Does anyone else think that smeg is rubbing her hands in glee watching haz provide more evidence for the divorce? I do. She's been setting him up since the beginning. No decent spouse would have allowed him to do this.
And his motherJust like his wife and Backgrid
All those extra sausages have to go somewhere!Too big to be from a Corgi ...
So the articles that he never read nor was exposed to, made him feel he his privacy was intruded on since birth and made him play into the stereotypes that were being printed about him. But he only saw the articles a couple of years ago after he bumped into his lawyer in France in 2018 (by the way Sherborne was only brought on as their lawyer in Meggsy’s People case after their original lawyer was fired). When was that - 2020/21? More rubbish!So finally he has HARD EVIDENCE
Hard Evidence that points to...
*drumrolls*
SUSPICIOUSNESS!!!
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
View attachment 2223316
Oh, God. They are so stupid. I am so done.