I think smashing Piers Morgan around the face with a cricket bat might solve some of his issues. It'd certainly solve some of mine.
I think smashing Piers Morgan around the face with a cricket bat might solve some of his issues. It'd certainly solve some of mine.The only evidence that Harry has presented is his need for proper, preferable inpatient, therapy for his paranoid disorder and the need to stop self medicating with drink, drugs, and Meghan/Doria's "woo"
Thats really funny
Brian is Harry's dealer.Brian Harvey has arrived on the scene, heckling outside…
Did he just say that there is no evidence?He doesn't even have any evidence to back up his claim of phone hacking. This is just ridiculous.
I may have been hacked every day over 15 years
Harry tells the court he filed his claims against MGN and News Group “at around the same time”.
He adds that he believes there was “industrial scale destruction of evidence” of unlawful information gathering in relation to him to which Mr Green asks where he gets this idea from.
“My legal team,” Harry replies.
Mr Green asks whether he thinks his phone was “consistently hacked” throughout the 15-year period between 1996 and 2011, the time period that makes up his claim against MGN.
“It could have been happening on a daily basis, I simply don’t know,” Harry responds.
Asked if he was aware of any evidence to show this, Harry says: “No, that’s part of the reason I’m here, my lord”.
Absolutely.I believe the whole relationship he has told her little bits of things/events/feelings etc that she has then blown up into massive dramas convincing him he has been hard done by and punished as the spare and he now needs to fight back (while she sits safely at home away from all the hassle providing no support).
And if that's not how it's happened at the very least she hasn't helped him or supported him to get over or work past all his humiliations and insecurities. He has soo much in his life now why isn't he just moving forward. She won't let him. Everything I read in SPARE sounded to me like it was written by a woman, he provided facts and she embellished them.
I'm sure for the Wales it does matter more to have have their grandpa calling/coming for a small party rather than a post on the social media. Meanwhile the flatpacks don't even know what their grandfather looks like (they might have a picture of theThere were definitely more social media birthday messages all round in previous years, from Charles and the wales. Is it possible this year they agreed KC wouldn’t send any at all to avoid accusations of favouritism? Or so it wouldn’t look suspicious when A&L didn’t get one? To be honest wishing children a happy birthday is all political anyway (whichever family you’re in!) as the kids won’t know or care either way. It’s more about not upsetting the parents, and I doubt W&C care about stuff like that
BIBHe doesn't even have any evidence to back up his claim of phone hacking. This is just ridiculous.
I may have been hacked every day over 15 years
Harry tells the court he filed his claims against MGN and News Group “at around the same time”.
He adds that he believes there was “industrial scale destruction of evidence” of unlawful information gathering in relation to him to which Mr Green asks where he gets this idea from.
“My legal team,” Harry replies.
Mr Green asks whether he thinks his phone was “consistently hacked” throughout the 15-year period between 1996 and 2011, the time period that makes up his claim against MGN.
“It could have been happening on a daily basis, I simply don’t know,” Harry responds.
Asked if he was aware of any evidence to show this, Harry says: “No, that’s part of the reason I’m here, my lord”.
So sadly Harold didn't realise that he was supposed to bring proof into the courtroom.He doesn't even have any evidence to back up his claim of phone hacking. This is just ridiculous.
I may have been hacked every day over 15 years
Harry tells the court he filed his claims against MGN and News Group “at around the same time”.
He adds that he believes there was “industrial scale destruction of evidence” of unlawful information gathering in relation to him to which Mr Green asks where he gets this idea from.
“My legal team,” Harry replies.
Mr Green asks whether he thinks his phone was “consistently hacked” throughout the 15-year period between 1996 and 2011, the time period that makes up his claim against MGN.
“It could have been happening on a daily basis, I simply don’t know,” Harry responds.
Asked if he was aware of any evidence to show this, Harry says: “No, that’s part of the reason I’m here, my lord”.
And some SPAMThis is becoming like a Monty Python sketch, we just need a dead parrot!
Mr Green asks whether he thinks his phone was “consistently hacked” throughout the 15-year period between 1996 and 2011, the time period that makes up his claim against MGN.
“It could have been happening on a daily basis, I simply don’t know,” Harry responds.
Asked if he was aware of any evidence to show this, Harry says: “No, that’s part of the reason I’m here, my lord”.
Did he just say that there is no evidence?
OMG…is he really saying…he was on vacation and ran into this lawyer, whose income derives from lawsuits…and his lawyer convinced him to file suit?So finally he has HARD EVIDENCE
Hard Evidence that points to...
*drumrolls*
SUSPICIOUSNESS!!!
View attachment 2223316
Oh, God. They are so stupid. I am so done.
BIB - I am kinda speechlessHe doesn't even have any evidence to back up his claim of phone hacking. This is just ridiculous.
I may have been hacked every day over 15 years
Harry tells the court he filed his claims against MGN and News Group “at around the same time”.
He adds that he believes there was “industrial scale destruction of evidence” of unlawful information gathering in relation to him to which Mr Green asks where he gets this idea from.
“My legal team,” Harry replies.
Mr Green asks whether he thinks his phone was “consistently hacked” throughout the 15-year period between 1996 and 2011, the time period that makes up his claim against MGN.
“It could have been happening on a daily basis, I simply don’t know,” Harry responds.
Asked if he was aware of any evidence to show this, Harry says: “No, that’s part of the reason I’m here, my lord”.
Both sets of grandparents too Theyre very lucky and they know it .I'm sure for the Wales it does matter more to have have their grandpa calling/coming for a small party rather than a post on the social media. Meanwhile the flatpacks don't even know what their grandfather looks like (they might have a picture of theinstead of KC)
This is becoming like a Monty Python sketch, we just need a dead parrot!"Prince Harry says there is "hard evidence of suspiciousness," can you have hard evidence of a suspicion, wouldn't that then be called proof.
Ooh yes, I forgot about the SpamAnd some SPAM
Bloody hell. I've been watching the repeats of Crown Court from the 70s and the judges and Barristers always warn witnesses not to speculate and hard evidence only. H is making a complete idiot of himselfThank you for all the updates you lovely people. I'm trying to get caught up on my lunch break.
Still no actual proof I see. Watching him go into court, he doesn't seem that bothered by all the press.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?