Harry & Meghan #352 I Fought The Law & The Law Won.

Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:

Thank you for this Cinny - you're a wonderful transcriber and I always look forward to reading Celt's thoughts ( can't be bothered listening to her though).

I think she's got everything spot on here, and I just can't wait for the media to be let loose regarding the kids. What they've done, why, what they hoped to get out of it, and of course what will happen next. It takes a very deranged mind to invent such nonsense, then continue running with it, using child actors and friends kids for photo ops. And an extremely sick mind to take it a step further by giving them (nobody) Prince and Princess titles. It also takes a very unhinged woman to marry into the most famous family in the world, then use moonbumps of various sizes and shapes to try to fool the public into thinking she carried Archie.

Today's Wordle explains Haz to a tee!
 
Reactions: 33
These AI chats are rigged and censoring, I watched a video recently of a centrist/right of centre American commentator chatting with C hat GPT and essentially it refused to slag off some of the more leftist lunacy politics (all the gender bollox, basically), but refused to write nice things about right leaning political figures. Whatever your political leanings aside, it’s been shown to be biased and refuses to produce bad content about certain key figures, which in society that is supposed to allow speech from all sides, is worrying that certain biases are allowed in the AI. It feels close to the wrongthink and thought police of the novel 1984. I think it depends on who is teaching the AI, who sets its parameters etc. I.e. the tech corps who are more likely to support people like Markle, Oprah etc.

I am not surprised the machine is attempting to make out certain people are doing good when most people with eyes and ears can see the massive grift the Harkles have going on.
 
Last edited:
Reactions: 41
I’m no expert on bumps as I’ve not been pregnant. However is it normal for it to change shape when you get in a squat position? Photos from Myra Twitter View attachment 2196282View attachment 2196284
To me in the top picture her legs look like they are very together at the front, not a wide stance.

When I was pregnant I was still doing cross fit - with adjustments! I had a tiny bump and tiny baby and the only squat I could do was a wide stance squat.

I do not believe MM carried either of her babies and I don't believe Lili was ever handed over to them.

In order to get that pregnancy face, I believe MM has used steroids. Allegedly.
 
Reactions: 47
Harry Plotter and the near catastrophic car chase
Omg, it’s just clicked for me. He’s Harry, the boy whose mum died tragically, and the Press are his Voldemort… it makes sense now. He’s trying to vanquish the Press.
 
Reactions: 40
I still can’t get over her wedding dress. The difference in care taken between hers and Kim K’s is unbelievable but shows who Givenchy recognise as the bigger star.

If you’re going to wear a simple dress it has to be tailored perfectly.

Their firework of stardom has never taken off and has spluttered and conked out. If she can’t recognise it by the low level of events she’s been invited to, the lack of phone calls from the big stars…

Who has been seen to be a friend? Ellen whose show has ended surrounded in controversy, who essentially took the mick out of her when she had her on the show? Gayle King? Who’s made her career out of being Orpah’s best friend?
 
Reactions: 37
I think that, regarding the kids (and if it's true they don't exist and/or were born via surrogate), its not up to the palace to embargo the news about it. To report on this without liability you have to navigate the heavily legislated water of children's privacy and medical privacy. In both Europe and the US if you violate any of this you need to be very, very well equipped with evidences/people on record to survive.

If this theories about the children are true - which I am not convinced, just because a very Narc and vain ILBW wouldn't gain wait just for the sake of it - to report them is a legal nightmare.

Even if the Palace has the kind of power to stop the British press - which I hope they don't, because Democracy - they couldn't stop it everywhere else: we have seen German, Australian and press from other countries publishing what the British press avoids.

So I wouldn't put my hopes too high for the whole thing to be revealed - even if true - anytime soon. However, I am ready to be proved wrong and I am all here for the huge scandal.
 
Reactions: 38
This picture of her is the money shot she wanted, lady in dress, on a podium infront of some microphones, smiling, Elle Woods style, during her victory speech. I’m pissed she got that moneyshot photo.
She knows all about moneyshots.
 
Reactions: 36
Song of the south is racist par excellence, it was made in the mid 40s, way before the civil rights movement, and in an era when black actors in film only had two role options: the Mammy and the Uncle Tom. it portrays the stereotypical wise savage character Uncle Remus, a recently freed slave, as being content to stay on with the slaving family who owned him (the famous-infamous hipy-dee-daah song), hence, by extension, no all slave owning families were bad - the disconnect with that sentence alone: you own other humans, you are inherently evil, periodt. no matter if you dress up the humans that are your chattel in silks. Nothing is mentioned of the unimaginable violence and discrimination the ex-slaves suffered which rendered it impossible for vast majority to actually move away from their former owners, transforming them from slaves to serfs.

let alone that the book is written by a white man, who collected the stories of the black slaves and appropriated and adapted them to suit the "sensibilities" of the white audience.

the cartoons might have been cute and the songs catchy, but the film is wrong in all ways possible. however, i believe it should not be censored, but should be shown as an example of not to do art.
 
Last edited:
Reactions: 30

I'm not sure about that. For instance, there have been many photos of "pregnant" Smeg shown in papers and magazines where the bump isn't right, has dropped, daft shape. When we've seen these on Tattle we immediately comment, but the press and mags don't - which makes me feel they can't, or shouldn't. Even comedians have never included this subject in any of their acts (that I'm aware of). So why not? In fact, when they're allowed to, Comedians will have an absolute field day - pop, drop, sway, square, grow, shrink, even disappear.
 
Reactions: 38
Happy new hair!
 
Reactions: 26
They would sue faster than they could say "bump". Then the journey/newspaper would have to prove that it was not optics/camera angle/whatever. One thing is to make a joke of it, another is put that in print as fact.
 
Reactions: 32
Great post. Thanks for explaining this so succinctly @Shushex

So interesting as I remember watching the film, and reading both the Brer Rabbit and Anansi stories as a child. Someone mentioned a retired Disney film on a previous thread but had no idea which one it was.
 
Reactions: 21
Well said, totally agree with you
 
Reactions: 64
They would sue faster than they could say "bump". Then the journey/newspaper would have to prove that it was not optics/camera angle/whatever. One thing is to make a joke of it, another is put that in print as fact.
Didn’t Sarah Vine put the moonbump in one of her columns?
 
Reactions: 26
Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.