- Status
New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
The 30th is when the special coronation special of The Windsors is on, so Sunday is going to be an enjoyable evening of Markle bashing, I hope
I wasn't on about his politics, he could've been anyone. My point was the tragedies he suffered at a young age and hasn't bleated on about aka poor me, like H has
Just watched a programme about Edward and Sophie.
They wanted their wedding at Windsor because they wanted it as low key as possible for a royal wedding and to make it a family occasion.
They wanted their wedding at Windsor because they wanted it as low key as possible for a royal wedding and to make it a family occasion.
---
Thanks for the recommendation HL xxIt was meeee
I've not opened my gin yet either. I'm waiting for the Coronation itself. Tea in the morning, gin during the afternoon and evening. Hic!
Hilarious! Present-day Harry and future Meg if she keeps bleeping about with her face
The whole of London will be watched and scrutinised for next week-end. MoD, Police, MI5 , SAS , marksmen , you name it. Tighter than a drum-yet I bet, everyone has a fabulous time.
We won't have the bbc on at all - it'll be turned over between sky and itv all day.......
While I hear you, to a child who had nothing to do with the how or why, it's irrelevant. The pain is the same
So. When you leave/retire a force such as police/fire/army you are asked if you’ll stay on for ‘waves’ and within a certain time frame you are required for a wave.
waves are being invoked.
waves are being invoked.
It all balances out. I've knitted everything from baby sets to Aran and Fair Isle sweaters but crochet leaves me completely baffled!
Why are the Guardian doing this. Its am old story. And I can't stand that historian woman. She's pro harkles
GBNews next - discussing the upcoming Markle expose..
Followed by is he rich or how rich is he I daresay.
With Lady c and Phil dampnier! Should be good.
It doesn't even look like the same person as so many things are different to the Cut Magazine Meghan and the Meghan introducing Misan Harriman.
1. The eyebrows are different.
2. The cheeks are different.
3. The chin is different.
4. The lips are different.
5. The nose is different.
6. The eyes also look different.
So IMO the Meghan introducing Misan Harriman is not the real Meghan as there are too many inconsistencies.
She hasn’t got the legs for shorts! Or suits or anything really!
OMG @Shushex is this for real? Are you saying the birds are stuffed or motorised spies?? Are they Sussex Squaddies? I just had a look at your link:Sweet @Cinnamon.girl of mine,
i'll spoiler this due to sensitive subject.
I have closely monitored your past dozen or so posts, and i am saddened that you can't seem to see the most blatantly obvious conspiracy of all. That is: Birds Aren't Real. You seem to be taken in, maybe even bamboozled, by Neil Sean's drone pigeon army, when the unquestionable truth is that since the 70's all the birds have been substituted by high end CIA surveillance drones. if you don't believe me, please check the detailed research of the following truth seeking websites:
Reddit - Dive into anything
www.reddit.com
there's even scripture, according to Wikipedia, on the subject:
Birds Aren't Real - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
please be mindful of the truth i'm sharing with you in your future Neil Sean video recaps.
always remember: the truth is out there.
P.S. this is satire. or is it?
"Actual drone aircraft made from taxidermied birds, similar to those alleged by the theory, were constructed by a New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology team in 2023.[18]"
Wow. While watching my Neil some time back I saw one stuffed drone getting amorous with another stuffed drone, but this now takes on a new sinister meaning and these two could have got their drone signals mixed causing one to jump on top of the other by mistake. Or one could be a Chinese spy and got found out, and what I thought was pigeon luuurrve was a cold-blooded assasination in broad daylight? OMG.
I don't know where to turn for the truth, but your concern is really touching and appreciated x
.................
This thread is fascinating, you never know what's going to come up and we stray far from our topic but always come back. If you made a list of the subjects we've covered it would stretch to pages. This is a lovely thread full of lovely people, and good job on the copyright @Chita, it couldn't be clearer.
It's the guardian . A no-hoper paper dying on its arse
I'm beginning to wonder if her recorded introduction of Missi Harriman (or whatever his name is) has actually been shown as an example of what he can do to alter looks etc on video. After all he alters most, if not all, of his pictures by photoshopping them so why not this? It was mentioned that her spoken words and her lips were out of sync. so could be because the vid has been 'tampered' with.
The whole thing could be another of her childish pranks, laughing at the public ..... make everyone believe she has had work done on her face and when everyone is talking about it then disclose that it is all the work of her wonderful friend Missi.(don't think he's called that but can't be arsed to go back to find his correct name).
- Status