Click to read the full post
---
---
It's a silent H. So that it doesn't take attention away from the M.That is just an M isn’t it, is there supposed to be an H as well?
Omg!! Reminds me of this lovely ginger!!from FB Gender Flips ... they have held back on the female Harold though..
That crown weighs a ton. I’m sure the last thing anyone wearing wants to do is lift a 4 year old. Also wearing crown means official time, not family time. Even if the kids (exist) were there that’s not a photo that would happen.Apologies if already posted
didn't one of your kings die by hot poker in the arse?
Correct, allegedly Edward II at Berkeley Castle in Gloucestershire.Edward II according to MrDanDan (allegedly he says)
I asked.... I'm now getting a historical lecture. lol
so unsure if they got medieval on his arse.Correct, allegedly Edward II at Berkeley Castle in Gloucestershire.
"Accounts that he had been killed by the insertion of a red-hot iron or poker into his anus slowly began to circulate, possibly as a result of deliberate propaganda; chroniclers in the mid-1330s and 1340s spread this account further, supported in later years by Geoffrey le Baker's colourful account of the killing. It became incorporated into most later histories of Edward, typically being linked to his possible homosexuality.] Most historians now dismiss this account of Edward's death, querying the logic in his captors murdering him in such an easily detectable fashion."
![]()
Edward II of England - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
Baroness Bruck...
"The sight of Charles, in crown, holding up Harry and Meghan’s son, Archie, on coronation day would go a long way to reverse recent damage. It could also signal royal pride in their family’s diversity."
Is this a joke?
Surely to be a full Lion King he should be holding up William as his heir?as some one aptly commented on twitter :
Yes,he's buried at Gloucester Cathedralso unsure if they got medieval on his arse.
i'll see myself out.
this video is from 11 months ago. I vaguely remember watching this when Emily put it out originally and was a bit disheartened. Samantha refiled with a new lawyer in March last year so hopefully the case has been tidied up now. The original did seem to be a bit all over the shop. Fingers crossed because the Dutchass needs some KARMA stat.Re marklee v markle: Don't get to hopeful about this case, there is still a strong possiblity of dismissal, Emily Baker did a segment when it was filed and pointed out many problems. They chose to file in Florida because Florida's anti-SLAPP laws are two of only a handful of states that do not address whether a SLAPP defendant's motion will halt discovery proceedings. So discovery was allowed to continue, but the case could still be dismissed as the jurisdictional choice is sketchy. The judge did warn that the case may be 'ripe for dismissal' before the depositions take place. Many of Samantha's claims don't meet the critera for defamation. Emily Baker was spot on during her coverage of depp v heard.
Here is the link :
Markle case coverage starts at 44:45
That last photo, arrogant little
I know it ww re-filed, and is hopefully more concise, however the jurisdiction problems, and proving defamation which resulted in loss of income remain the same. In general defamation cases are really hard to win. Misheard should have won her case, but her lawyers were really bad, and Depp's lawyers were really good. Nonetheless, it was heard's behavior during the trial, and on the witness stand that ensured a victory for depp.this video is from 11 months ago. I vaguely remember watching this when Emily put it out originally and was a bit disheartened. Samantha refiled with a new lawyer in March last year so hopefully the case has been tidied up now. The original did seem to be a bit all over the shop. Fingers crossed because the Dutchass needs some KARMA stat.
an inability to understand that the British Monarchy bears no resemblance whatsoever to Celebrity Showbiz or Stardom - no blurring of lines despite what the media/Harkles would dearly like. The Coronation is a ceremony steeped in history, tradition and solemnity - not a movie/reality show.That crown weighs a ton. I’m sure the last thing anyone wearing wants to do is lift a 4 year old. Also wearing crown means official time, not family time. Even if the kids (exist) were there that’s not a photo that would happen.
American media either needs to do some research or stop commenting.
Allow me.....Too small for her gaping abyss she needs a giant pillar candle, preferably alight!!