Wasn't shouty's great grandfather or something a king and on a list of slave traders and that is where the family money comes from.
Shouty attacks or shuts down anyone that points this out. Attack is the best form of defence it seems.
Wasn't shouty's great grandfather or something a king and on a list of slave traders and that is where the family money comes from.God, she is really going after Camilla isn't she ?
Any one else think Smegol is trying to release her hounds?
View attachment 1761911
I have an asshole of a brother too who my dad welcomed back into the family and let him and his family live rent free in the back of the family home for the last 10 years of my Dad’s life. It stank and we were pissed but it was what my Dad wanted so we tolerated him at Christmas, Father’s Day etc.Meghan did attend the State Banquet. 3 days prior. (Never gets old)
I know what happens regarding Duchess title if they get divorced. And what happens if remarry. But what happens to herGag… Princess Henry title
i think..IF… Hairs did contact KC3 about coming back. And he was divorcing her. A father couldn’t say no. That it would be ok to be back in the family. But exiled like Randy Andy. No public appearances. Live off your wealth in a small Royal owned apartment. And the rest of the family tolerates his appearance at Christmas functions
( I have a wayward asshole brother mom welcomed back after he told her to fuck off and ignored her for years)
he could fulfill his book and Netflix with stories of his evil narcissist wife and the horrible things she did (I would be more likely to read and watch that )
There was another one trending earlier in the week that whoever loses between USA and England get Harry and Megan. That was fun and had a lot of funny replies. I guess since a draw, it stays the same, sorry USA Tattlers, you get to keep them.Makes me think he said shady stuff about her in the book if it has had to be revised. It would be a real pity if the stuff that was edited ended up being leaked.....saying that the idiots that defend them would still make excuses for them.
They could split the difference and send him to stay with Harry & Meg in their mansion as the nanny. We never see the kids anyone so he will disappear as well and make everyone happy.
Hope you're getting through the horror of losing your beloved Zippy.i just logged on to post this lol Hello everyone hope you are all well sorry not posting a lot am in a good headspace at the moment and I am getting things done, I am thinking about getting Gyles book as it looks a good read and He is a decent bloke won't pull any crap
So sorry about losing your dad.When my Dad was heading towards the end of his life I knew he was going downhill but as I saw him every day I did not notice the change.
It wasn’t until after he died and I saw some photos taken a few weeks apart that I realised how frail he had become in a few weeks. I was shocked!
I knew in my heart I had done everything I could to look after him but I still wondered if I could have done more.
Harry had not seen his grandmother for a while, but he did see her in his quick stopover to the Invictus games. He must have noticed a big difference.
He must have realised that she did not have much time left
So why didn’t he make more of an effort to see her again, bring his children?
Bastard!
Actually I hope Spotify do a second series but not until after they break up and she can spew all the hate and lies she wants about stupid Hazza. You know she will and I will be laughing my head off at Hazza getting what he deserves. Wait for it, all his anger, drugs, drunkedness, domestic violence will be out there for all the world to hear about. True or not, she won’t care and neither will I.I wonder who the last guest of her podcast will be seeing as Tuesday is supposedly the last episode of Archetypes and I hope that Spotify don't consider a second series as this podcast has been a disaster from start to finish.
I agree. If she did a ton of events she’d be criticised for not being there for her kids and having the nanny raise them. So many people compare her to Princess Anne, the ‘hardest working royal’ but Anne’s children are adults, it’s a big difference.To be fair, I wouldn't be able to cope with the rigidity and pressure of an RF role and would probably bolt. Meghan seemed quite funny and likeable the first clip I saw of her, a quiz on Britishness on YouTube. Ironically enough it was Harry's statement about the media afterwards which first made me feel a bit wary. Neo nazis will be neo nazis and the press will be the press.
I don't understand criticism of Catherine though as she has 3 children under 10, and balances her own close family with RF and public duties. This doesn't make her lazy! If you want to be a SAHM be one (though she's not exactly, she does a lot of charity work not on court circular). I like her stability.
Ok first Charles simply wasn't going to grant the title at all, and now he's going to give to to Charlotte. Either this is all pure speculation and we're being played, or we're in the middle of some kind of grand master scheme of lies meant to expose... I don't know what, exactly, but this scene comes to mind. Perhaps it's Meghan who mustn't know!To the DailyMail:
It smells to me like made up crap. Belongs to the realm of science fiction. The daily mail gets views and has the added bonus of inciting negative feelings towards the king from people who think it's unfair and it's another nail in his coffin for people who already dislike him. It also makes him look foolish because things simply don't work like that. Rinse and repeat ad nauseam. Next we know it the daily mail is going to say the next duke is going to be the king's favourite bed of flowers or his favourite office worker.Ok first Charles simply wasn't going to grant the title at all, and now he's going to give to to Charlotte. Either this is all pure speculation and we're being played, or we're in the middle of some kind of grand master scheme of lies meant to expose... I don't know what, exactly, but this scene comes to mind. Perhaps it's Meghan who mustn't know!
Video is a Game of Thrones clip and has foul language, NSFW.
I can't see Charlotte getting the D of E title, although it would be lovely, surely she would be in line for the Princess Royal title?
Jesus Christ can you believe they actually put this on twitter
View attachment 1763464
BetterUp is a total fraud.Jesus Christ can you believe they actually put this on twitter
View attachment 1763464
That's how butternup get their clients, making people demented with the utter crap they spout.I can't see Charlotte getting the D of E title, although it would be lovely, surely she would be in line for the Princess Royal title?
Jesus Christ can you believe they actually put this on twitter
View attachment 1763464
That's how butternup get their clients, making people demented with the utter crap they spout.
Are they putting women in danger by saying this?
Does that mean to male clients that if a woman says no enough times to their advances it turns into a yes.
Do they charge people for this fecken shit?
Fecken woke brain dead amoebas. And I think I have even insulted the said organism.
Yes. She'd be fuck-all with out it.Wasn't shouty's great grandfather or something a king and on a list of slave traders and that is where the family money comes from.
No.Are they putting women in danger by saying this?
Does that mean to male clients that if a woman says no enough times to their advances it turns into a yes.
Camilla needs to be very careful about this.QUEENS companions for Queen CamillaBuckingham Palace announces Camilla's Queen's companions - not the traditional ladies-in-waiting
Some of the six ladies will appear publicly with Camilla for the first time at a Violence Against Women and Girls reception on Tuesday.news.sky.com
What every woman LOVES to hear! FFS. Shall we guess a man wrote this?? I’m quite sure many women have said fucking no, and it most certainly doesn‘t offer a step towards yes. Fucking IdiotsJesus Christ can you believe they actually put this on twitter
View attachment 1763464
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?