A boring one:
We had a ''visitor'' in the last thread.
They started a short conversation about books by a Diana murder (he believes it happened) writer.
The resident posters (some) gave response.
The books by the writer are based on the inquiries , so they sound incredibly plausible , but are actually easily refutable via the inquiries , and via the fact that the writer actually distorts the information from the inquiries by not only ''shaping a narrative '' but actually modifying dates, hours, timelines, statements to make the timelines ''logical .''
It follows the Andanson theory.
Today we get this:
DIANA, the late Princess of Wales had "fears" over being assassinated, following the tragic murder of her designer friend, Gianni Versace, a royal expert claimed.
www.express.co.uk
(Remember the names of individuals involved)
After reading the Express link , this is the essential read: (terribly long , but important to read )
"Narratives, padding ...'' all in two above combined .
Relevant because the Squad is using similar methods, and Harry and the media are doing exactly the same, in relation to Harry's digging and the resurfacing of Fayed related writers and ''narratives.''
Disclaimer for the above:
Of course anyone could use the above explanation to distract/manipulate the reader from the ''fact'' that she is actually ''murdered,'' yes even me.(so based on the above the conspiracy theory is true, the conspiracy is-to make the conspiracy theory-untrue)
Back to Harry , he's a ... as established .