Harry & Meghan #21 ”Finding Freedom” what a joke, such hypocrisy from two so “woke”

Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
I do not believe she gave birth to that child. I think she used a fake bump and a surrogate. Harry is probably the father, but to conceive naturally at 38 within a year of marriage is unusual, especially after a visit to Lake Como and the Clooneys, who miraculously had twins with an older mother/ secret transgender person. The baby looks like he has no idea who she is, children of that age are normally climbing all over you.
I know plenty of women who have had first and then further children in their 40s. I do believe she was pregnant, as I've said before she probably used those bumps as Hollywood celebs do just to garner attention, and I think the whole secrecy around birth and christening was her playing games to keep the media and world interested in her, any PR is good, it's capital.
Archie looked tired (tugging ear) and was bored with that book (and probably fed up of how many takes done for it too). Add that his mother wasn't interested in him and only the camera of course he wants to get away from her to play or go for his nap.

I'm intrigued that Harry didn't comment on VE day, he may not have Instagram account any more but he could have done something through invictus..
 
  • Like
Reactions: 14
Re Harry not mentioning VE day. He's in the US now, they didn't have a bank holiday yesterday so why would he acknowledge an important British date. Not like he served in the army or anything.

Just another thing which seems to show this whole situation is being controlled by MM et al.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 15
Re Harry not mentioning VE day. He's in the US now, they didn't have a bank holiday yesterday so why would he acknowledge an important British date. Not like he served in the army or anything.

Just another thing which seems to show this whole situation is being controlled by MM et al.
He’s in America, so we’ll give it three years then 😉
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: 8
Now we mention the birth again - I was thinking about this the other day. Perhaps the weirdness of the birth announcement and timings etc are because she didn’t give birth naturally, she had a c section. Maybe planned, maybe not? Hence delaying the ability to be seen in public or whatever, and not being able to word the announcement the same. I had an emergency one it was a bloody nightmare, but I suspect for vanity reasons she may have had a planned one a la VB in the very same hospital. A planned or not, you can’t stand or walk properly for a couple of days, it’s harder to exercise hence why she had more than is usual baby weight for a celeb (which was refreshing given I’m still a fat duck two years on) could I be on to something? 🧐 Might have been said before, but given the amount of threads I can’t remember so sorry if it has!
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: 8
I do not believe she gave birth to that child. I think she used a fake bump and a surrogate. Harry is probably the father, but to conceive naturally at 38 within a year of marriage is unusual, especially after a visit to Lake Como and the Clooneys, who miraculously had twins with an older mother/ secret transgender person. The baby looks like he has no idea who she is, children of that age are normally climbing all over you.
I know loads of mums, myself included who have had babies after 38. possibly takes a few months, but I’m sure Meghan would have had fertility help to make sure.
 
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 8
Has anyone seen Harry's video on the Invictus Games Facebook page? He look terrible
 
  • Like
Reactions: 7
I know loads of mums, myself included who have had babies after 38. possibly takes a few months, but I’m sure Meghan would have had fertility help to make sure.
This. Now, I dislike Meg has much as the rest of you but I genuinely believe she gave birth and carried Archie, if only because she knows Archie is her meal ticket for life. She hasn't defied medical science by giving birth at 37. Hell, my mum gave birth to me at 37 in the 80's and medical science has come a long way since then!
 
  • Like
Reactions: 16
Now we mention the birth again - I was thinking about this the other day. Perhaps the weirdness of the birth announcement and timings etc are because she didn’t give birth naturally, she had a c section. Maybe planned, maybe not? Hence delaying the ability to be seen in public or whatever, and not being able to word the announcement the same. I had an emergency one it was a bloody nightmare, but I suspect for vanity reasons she may have had a planned one a la VB in the very same hospital. A planned or not, you can’t stand or walk properly for a couple of days, it’s harder to exercise hence why she had more than is usual baby weight for a celeb (which was refreshing given I’m still a fat duck two years on) could I be on to something? 🧐 Might have been said before, but given the amount of threads I can’t remember so sorry if it has!
What struck me re the birth etc was that they refused to name the attending doctors.
The official notice posted at the gates of BP is usually signed by the doctors who attended.
The harkles had no doctors listed and call me batshit crazy but I suspect the the pregnancy was not achieved naturally via shaggy shaggy. I believe they (or more so her) were impatient to procreate and immediately went the route of fertility treatment rather than wait. Yes I know she's not ancient and getting pregnant might have come easy ... but it might also have been hard. At nearing 40 meggy knows her onions regarding her body and I think she knew that things might not happen naturally so she and ginger used fertility assistance of some kind. Ginger would agree purely to get a longed for baby like his brother had, and of course smeggy wanted a little hostage asap.
The point I'm making is that I think the refusal to name the doctors is because they were not the usual ones used by the royals. Well maybe some were, but I think she used others as well and didn't want the press delving into the situation.
Yes I know fertility specialists are not needed at the birth, but this is smeggy and she always over eggs the pudding in her quest to be princessy.

Has anyone seen Harry's video on the Invictus Games Facebook page? He look terrible
Slap it into him. He wanted his ickle smeggy in his beddy ... now he can lie with her to his hearts content and shag her till his bits drop off.

Not our problem anymore.
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: 15
It was posted today 9 March. Looks v unwell.

Quite shocking. He really doesn't look great, he's not even 40 but looks like he's aged 10 years in the last few months. Anybody looking at this thinking he is happy must need their heads feeling.
 
  • Like
  • Sad
Reactions: 14
So, who do we think Meghan/Harry is going to have an affair with? Who will stray first?
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: 9
The weirdness around the birth is probably because their embryo was created in a lab using her egg and his sperm so Archie is their biological child. I don't think she carried the baby, I believe now that they used a carrier. It might be for medical reasons or not but there was definitely a reason that we don't know about.

I do not believe she gave birth to that child. I think she used a fake bump and a surrogate. Harry is probably the father, but to conceive naturally at 38 within a year of marriage is unusual, especially after a visit to Lake Como and the Clooneys, who miraculously had twins with an older mother/ secret transgender person. The baby looks like he has no idea who she is, children of that age are normally climbing all over you.
I'm with you.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 10
A few people commenting on the book being black and white - black and white is recommended for babies up to a certain age. The content of the book looks like it doesn't correlate with the design. But it'll be very on-trend for the modern parents who like to keep all their baby stuff minimalist so it doesn't look out of place at home. I can't imagine this little boy having anything like a traditional royal rocking horse or whatever his Dad was used to. And probably no baby sized army gear like he had, either!
But that’s for babies under 3 months isn’t it? By 1 colour is good. Flap books are good as the baby can use its pincer grip & have a surprise.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2
It was posted today 9 March. Looks v unwell.

Good grief. That is a bit of a heart wrencher. As much of a wanker as he has been to them, I imagine that Kate and William will be upset by that, as will Brenda. Yes, he’s fair skinned and probably suffering with a bit of sunburn, and yes, the virus means it’s difficult to get to the barber (I say this as a woman who’s currently married to something which resembles Captain Caveman) but he looks thin, exhausted and an absolute shell of the Harry who left the UK, and not a member of the RF.

Who was it who mentioned that he was possibly suffering from depression? I think that may be your evidence :(
 
  • Like
  • Sad
Reactions: 15
It was posted today 9 March. Looks v unwell.

Oh dear! He really does not look well at all! Almost entering Chopinesque frailty...eventhough I'm disappointed in him (and his behaviour) I can't quell my feelings of wanting to help him somehow.
Then and again this was his own choice.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 13
Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.