x.
Oooh, so this writer usually goes full throttle when it comes to criticising the Snarkles? It’s the first time I have read one of her articles, I think, so I had nothing to compare it to. You’re right though, she does veer towards sometimes praising the vile pair for their ‘good intentions’ etc. I suppose the article has an air of ‘they might be behaving like complete pains in the arse but their hearts are in the right place…bless’.Nah, not keen on that write up. Not her usual scathing self.
"This situation goes to the very heart of their post-royal lives; lives which now seem driven by both a very genuine desire to help blah blah blah."
No it doesn't Daniela. It's fake. They can't virtue signal how wonderful they are without receipts. So they rub the feckin receipts in our faces.
"Harry and Meghan and their Archewell Foundation are unequivocally doing a lot of good things ..."
No they aren't Daniela.The foundation only has to donate 5% of donations to good causes and can claim the other95% toward admin and staff costs (H&M). Their outlay is minimal and we never get proper figures, just vague but very public announcements of "helped with a new roof....helped with a kitchen ... arranged disposable nappies from Proctor & Gamble for women's groups(at no personal cost to themselves at all) etc etc.
I'd bet next months wages that judged by percentage of our wealth in charity donations most of us on here have out done the snarkles by a country mile in aiding charities. But because it's 'bits' here and 'bobs' there and done with a good heart and forgotten about it doesn't get totted up.
I'll go further, I'd say that what we on tattle as a community have donated to various charities in the past week is more than the snarkles one off toward a kitchen overseas where work is cheap, or the "contribution toward ..." the new roof in Texas(?). Especially the freakin' cat people on here.A cat only has to give them sad eyes and they are scampering off to the shelter to help out or hand over their life savings.
Seriously though, from donating online to telly emergency aid appeals, local gofundme's, sponsoring our school kids fund raisers and charity walkers, using and supplying local charity shops and giving the gift of time and hands-on effort (which you can't put a price on) ... we as a community leave their "genuine desire to help" where it belongs, in the shitter with the rest of their crap.
Just caught up! I think we may be missing the obvious here.
She would also get a lot of hate and possible doxing from the sugars.
One thing is for certain though.Woman on gb news just said Tussauds dont melt the waxworks of people who have become less popular in case they become popular again.
She says they store them somewhere but they remove the wigs and use them on other waxworks - and she said, "the worst case scenario is, they move the waxworks to Blackpool."
Ironically, the ends of her hair do look like they need a neat trim.Co-host David Campbell mocked the hairdresser stance, saying: "Okay so what we're going to do is just put some highlights to the back here, and I think if we push it forward, it really does bring out your eyes, and you're good to go, you're good to bring down the monarchy."
Meghan Markle and Harry have Aussie hosts burst out laughing 'Looks like a hairdresser!' | Royal | News | Express.co.uk
View attachment 767099
Its because they are ‘compassionate’, obviouslyThis is outrageous. If they have a spare 1.5mil why waste it on ridiculous photos of themselves when there are starving children in the world
Immediately I have Beetlejuice in my head. Although that shrunkenheaded explorer is still more pleasing on the eye than the ginger marmoset.If Times Magazine were to shrink Harry's head to his actual brain size, they would need to call in a witch doctor to perform a shrunken head ritual.
Xx
Interestingly Salesforce is also part of the global alliance connected to Williams Earthshot Prize. Seems Benioff has his fingers in many pots!
Green was always a great colour on us gingersHarry's turn now..as a woman in another advert
View attachment 767055
I've just noticed the size of those pants the woman on the left is holding up looool
