Celt News also said that Harry was being rescued by William and her sources told her he was in Britain, when it was later announced he was actually doing the JP Morgan talk. So, as much as I like to watch those videos for a laugh, there's little merit to the 'facts' they claim to have.So celt news on YouTube ( I won't upload as Penny does that for us) surmises that the baby won't be shown, or brought back to the U.K. because he's been here all along, in the care and custody of the Queen.
Interesting...
I think I agree. Let’s face it, if we all know what little we know, you can bet your bottom dollar she knows everything. There’s no smoke without fire as they say. I agree, people are not always guilty by association, but when there is such a wave of opinion and doubt about an individual, keep clear!No I'm not buying what you're selling Smelly. The higher you get in showbiz the more you know about those around you and Oprah is as high as they go. Not a doubt in my mind she's heard rumours on her elite grapevine about most of the dodgy characters. These things are never totally kept under wraps. Those people look after themselves and as long as the tit doesn't happen to them personally they probably don't give a damn what goes on in the grubby underbelly so they waft along 'minding their own business' and leave the ponces etc to get on with it.
I'd bet next month's mortgage she heard stuff about those characters. I'm not saying she should ignore them, but hugging and kissing is tacit approval of the character as far as I'm concerned.
There's a pal of my partner I can't stand and have heard stuff about and I manage to dodge ever getting in photos with him at group events and I wouldn't dance with the bleep if you paid me. Oprah can't dodge photographs but she could keep them a bit less sloppy sucky-uppy.
Yup Smelly this stinks . I’m with freda19No I'm not buying what you're selling Smelly. The higher you get in showbiz the more you know about those around you and Oprah is as high as they go. Not a doubt in my mind she's heard rumours on her elite grapevine about most of the dodgy characters. These things are never totally kept under wraps. Those people look after themselves and as long as the tit doesn't happen to them personally they probably don't give a damn what goes on in the grubby underbelly so they waft along 'minding their own business' and leave the ponces etc to get on with it.
I'd bet next month's mortgage she heard stuff about those characters. I'm not saying she should ignore them, but hugging and kissing is tacit approval of the character as far as I'm concerned.
There's a pal of my partner I can't stand and have heard stuff about and I manage to dodge ever getting in photos with him at group events and I wouldn't dance with the bleep if you paid me. Oprah can't dodge photographs but she could keep them a bit less sloppy sucky-uppy.
They need to just duck off and stop trying to have an online presence
They don’t seem to be too bothered about “uplifting” their own families though...
The only thing these idiots want to uplift is the content of their wallet.
What family??? Poor Archie will never know what family is, his own mother will leave him with any fucker while H pimps her out to anyone & everyoneThey don’t seem to be too bothered about “uplifting” their own families though...
This is actually a gossip thread.Celt News also said that Harry was being rescued by William and her sources told her he was in Britain, when it was later announced he was actually doing the JP Morgan talk. So, as much as I like to watch those videos for a laugh, there's little merit to the 'facts' they claim to have.
Edit to clarify, I do realise you've said she surmises that Archie won't be shown and that she's not actually claiming to know this as fact; my comment is simply tangential because I remembered the earlier video when I read this.
I can't find the video on the channel anymore (I think it has been deleted), but it was posted on an earlier thread here. I'll edit it in if I can find it.
Edit: Found the post (#860) but the video is gone from there too!
Harry & Meghan #8 Ginge & Cringe: The Great British Break Off
No but just saw her latest post speculating that Pamela May be Andrew’s son 😳 What fresh hell is this! Because of his surname, there's many Anderson though but perhaps MM gave us a hint with Archificial Harry's Sontattle.life
Yes, I don't think she was ever pregnantI'm loving these threads!
A question for those who know more about this than me... Having looked at Danja Zone's and Murky Meg's videos, I am convinced that Meghan's verrry long pregnancy wasn't real but a moon-bump - or rather several moon-bumps whose sizes went up and down like yoyos - which points to a surrogacy.
But the apparent absence of a moving child has also caused lots of people to suppose that Archie doesn't even exist and is a silicone doll. I'm open to this idea because to be frank nothing about this pair of loons would surprise me.
However I'm struggling to understand how it could work. Surely the Queen and DofE would have spotted it when they saw him, as would all the people at the christening. I know these dolls are realistic but not that close up surely? Not to mention the Royal Protection Officers who are with them 24/7 - for now anyway! Given that the RPOs work for the Met and ultimately the Crown wouldn't they be bound to report back?
To those who subscribe to the idea of Archie not existing at all, how are those things explained? Is it thought that a child is borrowed for special occasions, or what? Thank you!
'Rent-a-baby'I'm loving these threads!
A question for those who know more about this than me... Having looked at Danja Zone's and Murky Meg's videos, I am convinced that Meghan's verrry long pregnancy wasn't real but a moon-bump - or rather several moon-bumps whose sizes went up and down like yoyos - which points to a surrogacy.
But the apparent absence of a moving child has also caused lots of people to suppose that Archie doesn't even exist and is a silicone doll. I'm open to this idea because to be frank nothing about this pair of loons would surprise me.
However I'm struggling to understand how it could work. Surely the Queen and DofE would have spotted it when they saw him, as would all the people at the christening. I know these dolls are realistic but not that close up surely? Not to mention the Royal Protection Officers who are with them 24/7 - for now anyway! Given that the RPOs work for the Met and ultimately the Crown wouldn't they be bound to report back?
To those who subscribe to the idea of Archie not existing at all, how are those things explained? Is it thought that a child is borrowed for special occasions, or what? Thank you!
You know where I said my comment wasn't directly about your post but was a tangential point because the new video reminded me of the 'William rescues Harry' video? Check my post history. I'm here for the tea, just as you are.This is actually a gossip thread.
Light hearted and actually rather fun for us all.
If you wish to ascertain the validity of every comment containing snippets, videos or outrageous opinions, you're probably in the wrong place....
Surely she could never have got away with a fake pregnancy. I mean I know a lot of people think it and I’m probably just being naive but how could she have pulled it off?Yes, I don't think she was ever pregnant
Calling itThey need to just duck off and stop trying to have an online presence
I think the same and I really don’t think Harry would go along with it.Surely she could never have got away with a fake pregnancy. I mean I know a lot of people think it and I’m probably just being naive but how could she have pulled it off?
Leaving aside, wobbly bumps, disappearing bumps etc. I just can't get to grips with the sinking gracefully to the floor, knees together, wearing 4 inch heels, and then effortlessly rising up, at 7 months pregnant?Surely she could never have got away with a fake pregnancy. I mean I know a lot of people think it and I’m probably just being naive but how could she have pulled it off?
There are people who are absolutely rabid and convinced that Kate faked all 3 of her pregnancies, that none of the 3 kids are genetically Will's (or hers), that Will only married Kate because the Middletons pulled strings and have dirt on William, that all 3 were mixed in a lab and Kate/the surrogate impregnanted without Will's consent (to trap him), that Meghan only managed to marry Harry because she forced him to through blackmail (I mean, as if the Windsors couldn't deal with blackmailers and as if Meghan and the Midds are more powerful than the Windsors and the establishment?!!? wtf??!)I'm loving these threads!
A question for those who know more about this than me... Having looked at Danja Zone's and Murky Meg's videos, I am convinced that Meghan's verrry long pregnancy wasn't real but a moon-bump - or rather several moon-bumps whose sizes went up and down like yoyos - which points to a surrogacy.
But the apparent absence of a moving child has also caused lots of people to suppose that Archie doesn't even exist and is a silicone doll. I'm open to this idea because to be frank nothing about this pair of loons would surprise me.
However I'm struggling to understand how it could work. Surely the Queen and DofE would have spotted it when they saw him, as would all the people at the christening. I know these dolls are realistic but not that close up surely? Not to mention the Royal Protection Officers who are with them 24/7 - for now anyway! Given that the RPOs work for the Met and ultimately the Crown wouldn't they be bound to report back?
To those who subscribe to the idea of Archie not existing at all, how are those things explained? Is it thought that a child is borrowed for special occasions, or what? Thank you!
Exactly.Surely she could never have got away with a fake pregnancy. I mean I know a lot of people think it and I’m probably just being naive but how could she have pulled it off?