I dont actually dislike either of them. They have had negative press right from the start. No wonder they have pissed off to do What they want.
Yes, they have indeed had bad press, but a lot of it was on point (eg their hypocrisy, the way they (M actually) treat staff, which led to a mass-exodus of nannies, assistants etc).
The press
is vile, so there's no excuse for the press when they do bully, but comparatively Meghan's had it easy. I didn't track all the stories and won't now (unless someone offers to pay me!), but to my memory it was calling them out on cost of their wardrobe, hypocrisy by lecturing plebs on travel whilst using private jets and having extravagant baby showers etc, stories on how they treat staff, gossip on family wars (H & Will not getting along), her attitude towards her role within the family and institution, the shyte-show in how they handled Archie's first few months (no release of godparents' names, no pic, utter secrecy around his birth) etc all of which has been pretty much true.
Now compare that to what Diana has gone through (yeah she also collaborated and called them, but just think of the abuse and hounding she was subjected to as teenager and in her early 20s when she was in no way capable of dealing with all that and didn't want the intrusion either), Fergie who was called "duchess of Pork" by the press when she gained weight (that is proper bullying, especially by today's standards, but even then absolutely appalling) and way more than just the name calling, what Camilla has gone through (she was even attacked by normal people in the street, called the worst names by press and public, I think she was even spat on) and what Kate and her family have also gone through.
I am not much of a fan of any of them tbh, but they've all been insulted by the press, hounded and had their private lives taken apart by the press and the public via a trial by the media, some deserved (not the degree of harshness, mind, but reporting on missteps for instance should be allowed), but much of it not ("duchess of Pork", "the Rottweiler", "Waity Katie", "Middle class Middletons".. I mean, really? was all that necessary?).
By comparison Meghan hasn't even had that level of intrusion and no name calling whatsoever. She claimed paps lined her street and were outside of her home in Toronto and that they even broke into her house and all of these allegations have been denied by 1) the paps and media involved 2) the neighbours who've been witness (to the hay bale rolling down their street!), and most importantly 3) the Toronto police, as they've never been even called out even though some pap broke into M's house and a swarm of those pesky paps hounded her outside (
not!).
Besides, where are the pictures if that were true? We have the pics of Diana outside her flat before marriage, of Kate being hounded outside her flat before she married (and the whole street she used to live on, she was followed up and down), pics of Camilla at her home when news of the affair broke, yet not one pic of M outside her home or on her street in Toronto?
Now I think that was the first nail she hit into her coffin, because the press did not take lightly to these lies and accusations of hers.
This lie was then followed with H's dumb as fck statement to leave her alone (even though no one bothered her, except the voices in her head telling her paps are chasing her), coincidentally H's statements had some Americanisms since M entered his life. Funny that.
Anyway, long story short, they pissed off because they are irate inane idiot divas, not because the big bad press and big bad William (& Kate) made their life miserable.
I guess M strives when she's able to speed dial the paps, who cares if the kid falls out of the carrier, amirite? She was just living before that. Girlfriend thought she'd have a pap walk every day as royal and be adored by the masses.
Their fall came about by their own making, nothing else.
Edit: The worst M had to endure was the press' digging into her past and background, but she was not insulted, not belittled, not personally bothered, and initial press was also positive.
I didn't follow their S Africa tour, but press people touted it as a success and a new leaf in the Ssucks story, only then did they slap the press with that lawsuit of theirs in the face and press people were furious. Rightly so.
She baited her own father via her friends and then when he fell into her trap she cried "traitor" and sued the press for publishing the letters she wrote with hopes of being leaked to begin with.
Just compare her handwriting from the letters and cards she wrote her father before (Harry) and the handwriting of that fateful letter she sued the press over. The letter was in her fugly "calligraphy", ie clearly intended for a wider audience, just like all those oh-so-personal-and-thoughtful thank-you cards she sends out.
Manufactured bullshyte meant to paint her in a positive light and be "lasting".
Oh and she sues the press because they "misrepresented her" by only publishing a part of that letter and not the whole letter, yet how dare they publish her letter even though it was written for publication! (yeah, my head hurts, in case anyone wonders). Her dad deliberately showed only parts of her letter, as he wanted to just defend himself and showed what was relevant, yet she was angry about the "leak" while at the same time she was angry the whole thing wasn't leaked. I mean wtf!!!
Sorry for this long rant, but these two (esp M) can really get me going....
www.dailymail.co.uk
They don’t live here, are not part of the working monarchy, they’re not part British life at all, so do be a patron is a complete farce.
