And likeabilityBut without Yoko's talent
- Status
New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
Probably more like a wizard's sleeve
I’m not sure he does , he’s just meeting the demands of the narcissist he’s married to
That’s very true. Another thing worth considering though - we’ve seen a very unpleasant side of PWB’s character over the last few years, but I doubt this has come as a total shock to the RF. They’ve known his character for a very long time, even if Smegma has exacerbated it. Perhaps the RF were praying hard that PW would produce heirs and then breathed a sigh of relief when Hazno moved away from any realistic chance of inheriting. As someone upthread suggested, perhaps the childhood favouritism was because Hazno was an unpleasant little brat and no one really liked him. I have a niece like that - she’s so thoroughly obnoxious no one wants to invite her anywhere.
Hello and welcome to the thread! That’s interesting, so Croatia doesn’t appear to have been an option then.Hi, a new poster, but a long time lurker.Still catching up from about 20 pages ago, so just quickly de-lurking to say Croatia doesn't allow sex selection or surrogates. And I hope those two what Freda says have never been here, yuck.
Or as someone said in an earlier thread - Heather Mills with two legs.But without Yoko's talent
I think with a wife like Catherine he would have made the transition quite well. The current wife i imagine has played upon his ridiculous immaturity and dripped poison regarding his family into his ear leading to the shitshow he now finds himself in the centre of. As I said earlier it could have been so different and given time they could have had all they desired. Fools
Ironically, he would have probably loved Gourdonston.
I hope, if nothing else, this tendency to shoehorn square pegs into round holes stops with the next generation.
“Big bad blue bandits” Fergie and Pam Stephenson - jeeps now that was worth paying a licence fee for - NotI was just jesting, I'm not expecting a call from the head of light entertainment at the BBC...but you never know, they did commission It's A Royal Knockout
You just got there before me!
Last edited:
Actually - and this is a memory so pulling it out from the back of the brain and dusting it off … wasn’t there a book by a Diana bodyguard (or similar) who said that as a child Harry was more popular with staff than William.
Am going to have to go on a google hunt … tbc
Maybe she should have invited Harry for tea on his own and given him "how to be a spare" lessons.
Imagine if Meghan had rocked up while the Queen Mother and Margaret had still been around!!!
I haven’t heard that one. I did read somewhere that Diana spoiled him and he never got punished for anything.
The Queen Mum wouldn’t have tolerated her tit. Iron fist in a velvet glove, that one.
Here we go
https://www.nzherald.co.nz/lifestyl...says-ex-bodyguard/WLTHPCLJ3HKPTQ272XANBJLXVU/
When Ken mentions Harry, his face softens. He was, it turns out, the favourite among Palace staff.
William tended to be sly, whereas Harry was much more open. You knew exactly where you stood with him.
"He was a very likeable individual who'd come and knock on the door, saying: 'Any chance of a fight? I'm bored. Can I play with one of your walkie-talkies?'
William wouldn't do that. He'd always stand back. That was his nature. He was a slightly difficult child.
"You know how in a group of children there's often the odd one who doesn't quite fit the bill?
"William was one of those. That wasn't to say he was bad. He was just not like his brother. He was prone to being a bit wet.
"Everybody liked Harry because he was funny. William wasn't. That was his character and, of course, he knew exactly who he was.
"Why wouldn't he? He's at a palace where there are chefs, nannies, cleaners, drivers, ladies-in-waiting, dressers and he was always being told he was something special.
Last edited:
No no no. You've got it all wrong! The current wife explained how things would be going forwards (phrase hate alert) and Hazzno trotted along like a good little princeling
Hmmmm, interesting.
Up to six weeks after the birth is the window to register a UK birth, so a certificate with a registration date of at least six weeks after the birth might imply that the child was born to a surrogate &/or be the subject of a Parental Order. That would be an incidental disclosure?
My info is only from The Tudors but I think Henry VIII was a spare too. He also married his brother's wife.
and it’s not like The Queen Mum and The Queen didn’t have first hand knowledge on just how hard being a woefully underprepared King actually was.
Off to check UrbanDic for ’walkie-talkie...
- Status