Oh here we go again with the 'taxpayers need to pay for our security' blackmail PR...
Since Meghan Markle and Prince Harry moved in to their Montecito home with Archie in July last year, the Santa Barbara County Sheriff's Office has responded to calls listed as phone requests, alarm activations and property crimes
www.mirror.co.uk
Police have been called to Meghan Markle and Prince Harry's Southern California mansion nine times in as many months, official figures reveal.
Since Harry and Meghan moved in to their Montecito home with one-year-old son Archie in July last year, the Santa Barbara County Sheriff's Office has responded to calls listed as phone requests, alarm activations and property crimes.
The data, obtained under Freedom of Information laws by the PA news agency, was released after the couple shared their security fears in their bombshell interview with Oprah Winfrey.
Officers were called four times in July last year after Harry and Meghan moved to Montecito from Los Angeles, where they had been temporarily living since leaving Canada at the start of the pandemic.
So if you decode this, their alarm was triggered by something (e.g. wildlife) a few time which didn't result in a callout or visit. Not unusual with burglar alarms if you have a cat. The police seem to have visited the property twice, which were the Christmas day incident when someone was wandering around the garden. They've already put out PR for that one.
In the real world, there were
402,000 burglaries in England and Wales last year. Actual break-ins, not someone wandering through the garden. Good luck even getting the police to turn out for them. So why exactly are the Harkles supposed to be uniquely at risk? All this PR actually says is that they have been living in Montecito for nearly a year, no-one's broken into their house (if they live there) and their service from the local police is far, far better than any UK citizen would get.
OOh I was just about to post this with a rant.
So here's just the rant:
In the same bloody article it says that ' The couple now pay their significant security bill themselves. The cost is so high it is thought to have been the main reason for their decision to seek lucrative business deals with companies such as Netflix and Spotify. '.
So they do have security ?
And talk about rinsing it - we didn't want to work with Spotify, Netflix etc we HAD TO because our security was pulled.
Correct me if I am wrong here Tattlers - they engaged with Spotify, Netflix, anyone that looked at them funny looooooooooooooong before they knew they would not be covered for their security once they were not working Royals.
Ffs - there are working Royals who don't have security !
But no - they are so special its utterly reasonable for them to assume they should be an excepiton to all the established rules and ways of working that have been established for DECADES.
Here's some more rinsing from the same article:
'The Duchess, 39, revealed she had written letters pleading with the Royal family not to take away her husband’s personal protection officers, warning he was facing death threats.
She complained that depriving their son, Archie, of a title had put his safety and risk and said there had been “no explanation” for the decision.'.
What evidence does she have of threats ?
And the title thing has been explained a million times even though it does not need explaining.
The pair of them are window licking loony cunts.
) & my property had been trespassed four times in as many week, I’d get better fences, better alarm system or move house.