Just had a look at California's crime stats. Scary stuff. In 2017, there were 947,000 property crimes (Burglary, theft, motor vehicle theft), which works out at around 25 incidents per 1,000 persons. The Harkles haven't been a victim of a property crime as the bloke in their garden was initially booked on a misdemeanor trespassing charge and later released without further action, which is interesting in itself....
Harry and Meghan #86 Piers slams down his judgerly gavel, the Harkles' lies start to unravel
- Status
New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
Thanks, @Grannyapple68 , @Kittypops & @Rubythefirebat for the last thread. And @freda19 for her avatar, I chuckle everytime I see it.
This thread moves faster than I remember before my H &M break. Always on the ball.
The only ways for Meghan to "fight back" is to sue , release her own statements or release goodwill PR puff pieces. She and Harry are not good in the art of war. It's not about who is right but who has the best strategy. The palace haven't said much except how "well-loved" the Sussexes are and not saying anything else publicly. What happens is there will be a slow leakage of information that chips away undermines their credibility. Right now Piers is trolling her hard and I think is deliberately trying to piss her off. The general fan consensus is why allow people to "lie" and "you have to have your voice" and respond but they aren't business people and so-called humanitarians, they're randoms having wars on Twitter. Sometimes you have to know which battles to choose and what's worth the negativity because reputation is key. They seriously do not get it, sometimes the quiet approach is more powerful than the attack. I think I read an article saying they were surprised about the backlash, which is incredible and shows how out of tune they are. They created a media storm of negativity and a very pubic spat with their family and think they will look good and everyone will think, "oh, what a lovely, friendly couple". I imagine the Sussexes are on a high because they have a demographic of fans/media outlets who have politicsed her spat with the royal family so maybe they feel invincible but long term it doesn't help their reputation in the areas they want to work in.
They should take a leaf out of the Obamas books, a couple they want to emulate. Michelle Obama's comments were in my opinion, a subtle act of giving the Sussexes advice - public service is about the people, continue your charitable endeavours and stop fighting with your family because they are important. But they prove they listen to nobody. They have the Netflix and Spotify deals, all they had to do was go to LA ignore everybody and do what they say makes them happy and the media storm would have eventually calmed down but no, they have to have the last word. In the end, it really doesn't do them any favours, it makes them look spoiled, bitter and untrustworthy. There are other companies and big hitters that perhaps may be wary of doing business in the future with people who behave like this. Sure, there'll be the Oprahs who want the scoop, but that's the issue - she wouldn't have been interested if it weren't royal gossip they were delivering. They now need to prove they are more than royal gossip.
Re: Security at the mansion. I imagine all the celebrities in Hollywood have to deal with this kind of thing. I remember Sandra Bullock had a stalker who broke into her home and she hid in her wardrobe. It's awful. That doesn't mean the royal family should pay for the Sussexes security or UK tax payer, either when they're supposedly raking in the money now.
I have not even heard of it which speaks for itself!
Unfortunately there are many, many cases of children/young adults whose disappearance do not gain high levels of media interest and many cases are still unsilved, like Suzy Lamplugh for example. Madeline McCann is the one people refer to all the time because of the money spent and how long the investigation has gone on for. I can't think of any other cases that have gone on for the length of time the McCann case (please correct me if I am wrong!) so it's not a regular occurrence at all, but it is a case that everyone seems to compare others to.
This thread moves faster than I remember before my H &M break. Always on the ball.
The only ways for Meghan to "fight back" is to sue , release her own statements or release goodwill PR puff pieces. She and Harry are not good in the art of war. It's not about who is right but who has the best strategy. The palace haven't said much except how "well-loved" the Sussexes are and not saying anything else publicly. What happens is there will be a slow leakage of information that chips away undermines their credibility. Right now Piers is trolling her hard and I think is deliberately trying to piss her off. The general fan consensus is why allow people to "lie" and "you have to have your voice" and respond but they aren't business people and so-called humanitarians, they're randoms having wars on Twitter. Sometimes you have to know which battles to choose and what's worth the negativity because reputation is key. They seriously do not get it, sometimes the quiet approach is more powerful than the attack. I think I read an article saying they were surprised about the backlash, which is incredible and shows how out of tune they are. They created a media storm of negativity and a very pubic spat with their family and think they will look good and everyone will think, "oh, what a lovely, friendly couple". I imagine the Sussexes are on a high because they have a demographic of fans/media outlets who have politicsed her spat with the royal family so maybe they feel invincible but long term it doesn't help their reputation in the areas they want to work in.
They should take a leaf out of the Obamas books, a couple they want to emulate. Michelle Obama's comments were in my opinion, a subtle act of giving the Sussexes advice - public service is about the people, continue your charitable endeavours and stop fighting with your family because they are important. But they prove they listen to nobody. They have the Netflix and Spotify deals, all they had to do was go to LA ignore everybody and do what they say makes them happy and the media storm would have eventually calmed down but no, they have to have the last word. In the end, it really doesn't do them any favours, it makes them look spoiled, bitter and untrustworthy. There are other companies and big hitters that perhaps may be wary of doing business in the future with people who behave like this. Sure, there'll be the Oprahs who want the scoop, but that's the issue - she wouldn't have been interested if it weren't royal gossip they were delivering. They now need to prove they are more than royal gossip.
Re: Security at the mansion. I imagine all the celebrities in Hollywood have to deal with this kind of thing. I remember Sandra Bullock had a stalker who broke into her home and she hid in her wardrobe. It's awful. That doesn't mean the royal family should pay for the Sussexes security or UK tax payer, either when they're supposedly raking in the money now.
I have not even heard of it which speaks for itself!Unfortunately there are many, many cases of children/young adults whose disappearance do not gain high levels of media interest and many cases are still unsilved, like Suzy Lamplugh for example. Madeline McCann is the one people refer to all the time because of the money spent and how long the investigation has gone on for. I can't think of any other cases that have gone on for the length of time the McCann case (please correct me if I am wrong!) so it's not a regular occurrence at all, but it is a case that everyone seems to compare others to.
Last edited:
Nice little win for the day. No doubt I'm expecting a handwritten note explaining why this is unfair in the post.
Is it me or does their behaviour over the last few weeks seem even more desperate. Agree on the fake kidnap storytelling but what's the betting she just copies Princess Anne's real life drama.
Is it me or does their behaviour over the last few weeks seem even more desperate. Agree on the fake kidnap storytelling but what's the betting she just copies Princess Anne's real life drama.
The Royals should find a way of asking him to cease using that term "royal correspondent" what he spouts they won't want to be associated with...
With all the money and deals they have going on they could easily afford adequate and effective security. Millions of dollar deals have been signed allegedly, so this is well within their means. Unless, there isn't that much money knocking about, they must be haemorrhaging money with their payroll, PR, mortgages , face lifts, Dior dresses , Archies 5 man team of specialists and so on.
This must be about the cost of security and they can't afford it moving forward, I suspect the money is only going to last for so long, maybe another year?? hopefully less
ETA don't forget the law suits they are going to cost a small fortune..
This must be about the cost of security and they can't afford it moving forward, I suspect the money is only going to last for so long, maybe another year?? hopefully less
ETA don't forget the law suits they are going to cost a small fortune..
Last edited:
Nor I, but have just chased up.
Attachments
Harry knew full well that there'd be no security for him if he stopped being a working member of the RF. He can't have missed the huge fuss Andrew made when his daughters didn't get security. Now he has to pay for their security (although I bet its the Queen who actually pays for it).
Plus it would have been spelt out to both Harry and Megain before they left. Who the f**k do they think they are expecting British tax payers to pay for them? It's disgusting. We have better things to pay for especially at the moment with Covid.
And I'm still waiting for someone to point out that if you don't speak to your Dad and his family. Speak only to your mother whilst ignoring her family and have a long list of past friends that you no longer speak to, then at some point you have to ask yourself 'Is it me?'
Unless you're a malignant narcissist of course, then it's everyone elses fault.
Plus it would have been spelt out to both Harry and Megain before they left. Who the f**k do they think they are expecting British tax payers to pay for them? It's disgusting. We have better things to pay for especially at the moment with Covid.
And I'm still waiting for someone to point out that if you don't speak to your Dad and his family. Speak only to your mother whilst ignoring her family and have a long list of past friends that you no longer speak to, then at some point you have to ask yourself 'Is it me?'
Unless you're a malignant narcissist of course, then it's everyone elses fault.
The only way she could find work was to shag a producer, lick up to casting agents and milk her industry dad's contacts, in reality. That's not even that unusual; contacts, shagging the right people and nepotism are factors in quite a few people getting work.I mentioned that on the Piers Morgan thread and got lambasted for it!
Apparently the poor thing only did that because that's the only way she could find work
Nothing to do with her very light skinned mixed race ancestry, more to do with being an untrained, no-talent also-ran in a town utterly heaving with both incredible female character actors of all ages and races and traffic-stoppingly beautiful twenty-something actresses and models, some also with actual talent and training. Markle doesn't fit in either category.
She's never been good looking enough to make up for her lack of training, or had any training to make up for what are fairly average pretty girl looks in that town and got roles suited to 'pretty, and able to fart out lines' consistent with her untrained background and her industry contacts. She's been little but a hustler in that town by her own admission from the start, and a fame-seeking type rather than anyone invested in the craft of acting.
I love the way people go on, as if US media was utterly devoid of mixed race or actually black talent until Suitcase Girl appeared too. Quite an insult to the many working actors and actresses of various ethnicities who've made their mark over the years without pretending to be white.
Last edited:
Probably Piers doing a recce...
Absolutely - Richard Prior was one of my faves and Richard Roundtree as 'Shaft'. I had pics of him on my wall. That series was basically a totally black cast and everyone loved it.
One of my favourite moments of the wedding was the exchange between the brothers as Kate arrived, William looking straight ahead and Harry turning around to catch a glimpse before leaning towards his brother to whisper something with a little smile on his face. For me, it captured the strength of the relationship perfectly and it was a beautiful moment... Aw shucks, now I'm a blubbering mess too!!
Got an automatic reply from Harper's Bazaar.
Attachments
Don't be silly. Super Smeg Star, Empress of the World will beat them off with her superior martial arts skills whilst defending Harry, Kids, dogs and chickens at the same time. Then she'll get hold of the kidnappers and explain to them where their life has gone wrong and why they should 'be nice'. They will instantly fall in love with her and worship at her feet forever more.
Right at the end it say's W&K may be planning a tell all of their own. PLEASE DON'T DO IT.
www.newidea.com.au
Prince William and Kate Middleton to set record straight in tell-all interview
Harry and Meghan shocked the royal family and the world with their bombshell interview with American talk show queen Oprah Winfrey. And now, in the wake of the Sussexes’ sensational claims and allegations, it has been purported that Prince William and Kate Middleton are set to even the score...
www.newidea.com.au
What an empty gratuitous opportunistic comment for Scobie to make.
There are multiple unknown factors that have lead to Richard Okorogheye’s death, these are being investigated so premature comment is cheap.
My condolences are for his family & friends as they come to terms with their loss.
I doubt they would, the Queen wouldn't allow itRight at the end it say's W&K may be planning a tell all of their own. PLEASE DON'T DO IT.
Prince William and Kate Middleton to set record straight in tell-all interview
Harry and Meghan shocked the royal family and the world with their bombshell interview with American talk show queen Oprah Winfrey. And now, in the wake of the Sussexes’ sensational claims and allegations, it has been purported that Prince William and Kate Middleton are set to even the score...
Agreed. They need to maintain their dignity. Dignity is something the Markles know nothing about. (And will never learn either)
Kind. 'Be kind'. Let's use the current lexicon preferred by pseuds and shams.
In reality, she could likely take the paint off walls screeching abuse at any assailant, like she did to the BP staff. Kind, my arse.
Well saidThanks, @Grannyapple68 , @Kittypops & @Rubythefirebat for the last thread. And @freda19 for her avatar, I chuckle everytime I see it.
This thread moves faster than I remember before my H &M break. Always on the ball.
The only ways for Meghan to "fight back" is to sue , release her own statements or release goodwill PR puff pieces. She and Harry are not good in the art of war. It's not about who is right but who has the best strategy. The palace haven't said much except how "well-loved" the Sussexes are and not saying anything else publicly. What happens is there will be a slow leakage of information that chips away undermines their credibility. Right now Piers is trolling her hard and I think is deliberately trying to piss her off. The general fan consensus is why allow people to "lie" and "you have to have your voice" and respond but they aren't business people and so-called humanitarians, they're randoms having wars on Twitter. Sometimes you have to know which battles to choose and what's worth the negativity because reputation is key. They seriously do not get it, sometimes the quiet approach is more powerful than the attack. I think I read an article saying they were surprised about the backlash, which is incredible and shows how out of tune they are. They created a media storm of negativity and a very pubic spat with their family and think they will look good and everyone will think, "oh, what a lovely, friendly couple". I imagine the Sussexes are on a high because they have a demographic of fans/media outlets who have politicsed her spat with the royal family so maybe they feel invincible but long term it doesn't help their reputation in the areas they want to work in.
They should take a leaf out of the Obamas books, a couple they want to emulate. Michelle Obama's comments were in my opinion, a subtle act of giving the Sussexes advice - public service is about the people, continue your charitable endeavours and stop fighting with your family because they are important. But they prove they listen to nobody. They have the Netflix and Spotify deals, all they had to do was go to LA ignore everybody and do what they say makes them happy and the media storm would have eventually calmed down but no, they have to have the last word. In the end, it really doesn't do them any favours, it makes them look spoiled, bitter and untrustworthy. There are other companies and big hitters that perhaps may be wary of doing business in the future with people who behave like this. Sure, there'll be the Oprahs who want the scoop, but that's the issue - she wouldn't have been interested if it weren't royal gossip they were delivering. They now need to prove they are more than royal gossip.
Re: Security at the mansion. I imagine all the celebrities in Hollywood have to deal with this kind of thing. I remember Sandra Bullock had a stalker who broke into her home and she hid in her wardrobe. It's awful. That doesn't mean the royal family should pay for the Sussexes security or UK tax payer, either when they're supposedly raking in the money now.
Unfortunately there are many, many cases of children/young adults whose disappearance do not gain high levels of media interest and many cases are still unsilved, like Suzy Lamplugh for example. Madeline McCann is the one people refer to all the time because of the money spent and how long the investigation has gone on for. I can't think of any other cases that have gone on for the length of time the McCann case (please correct me if I am wrong!) so it's not a regular occurrence at all, but it is a case that everyone seems to compare others to.
These people warring on Twatter mainly show themselves up as idiots. I'm constantly amazed at the level of vitriol and uninformed bollocks I've seen on there.
The royal family are doing the right thing by rising above the criticism and not responding to rubbish. Let them all drown in their cesspit of hate.
You are completely right about the Harkles lacking credibility with the people who count. Their fanbase shows them up and Scabies is going to get himself in trouble if he stirs the pot too far. The real elites will not want to work with litigious people who can't take any criticism and slag other people off. Its never a good look to be ungracious and critical of your former employers and your family.
Last edited:
They are too classy to do that!! the only way they can set the record straight is for the RF actually to actually action real things against the Harkles'. I hope things are being discussed behind the scenes I really do!! otherwise H and M are only going to get worse
Why would they bother when it is patently clear he has the ear of nobody whatsoever and is a paid Smegma creature? Returning fire is a pointless exercise as it lowers them to her pavement scraping level.
La-la land - a place where you don't need a passport just an STI or a porn video circulating...
- Status